Skip to main content

Classifying Frog Calls Using Gaussian Mixture Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Visual Computing (ISVC 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9475))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We focus on the automatic classification of frog calls using shape features of spectrogram images. Monitoring frog populations is a means for tracking the health of natural habitats. This monitoring task is usually done by well-trained experts who listen and classify frog calls, which are tasks that are both time consuming and error prone. To automate this classification process, our method treats the sound signal of a frog call as a texture image, which is modeled as Gaussian mixture model. The method is simple but it has shown promising results. Tests performed on a dataset of frog calls of 15 different species produced an average classification rate of 80 %, which approximates human performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hsu, A., Emerson, J., Levy, M., de Sherbinin, A., Johnson, L., Malik, O., Schwartz, J., Jaiteh, M.: The 2014 environmental performance index. Technical report,Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, CT (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agency, U.E.P.: America’s wetlands : our vital link between land and water. Technical report, Office of Water, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Knutson, M., Sauer, J., Olsen, D., Mossman, M., Hemesath, L., Lannoo, M.: Landscape associations of frog and toad species in iowa and wisconsin, USA. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Papadimitriou, E., Loumbourdis, N.: Copper kinetics and hepatic metallothionein levels in the frog rana ridibunda, after exposure to cucl2. Biometals 16, 271–277 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stolyar, O., Loumbourdis, N., Falfushinska, H., Romanchuk, L.: Comparison of metal bioavailability in frogs from urban and rural sites of western ukraine. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 54, 107–113 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carey, C., Bryant, C.J.: Possible interrelations among environmental toxicants, amphibian development, and decline of amphibian populations. Environ. Health Perspect. 103, 13–17 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Searle, C.L., Biga, L.M., Spatafora, J.W., Blaustein, A.R.: A dilution effect in the emerging amphibian pathogen batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 108, 16322–16326 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Relyea, R.A.: Trait-mediated indirect effects in larval anurans: reversing competition with the threat of predation. Ecology 81, 2278–2289 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mossman, M.J., Hartman, L.M., Hay, R., Sauer, J.R., Dhuey, B.J.: Monitoring long-term trends in wisconsin frog and toad populations. In: Status and Conservation of Midwestern Amphibians, pp. 169–198 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grigg, G., Taylor, A., Mc Callum, H., Watson, G.: Monitoring frog communities: an application of machine learning. In: Proceedings of Eighth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, Portland Oregon, pp. 1564–1569 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Acevedo, M.A., Corrada-Bravo, C.J., Corrada-Bravo, H., Villanueva-Rivera, L.J., Aide, T.M.: Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: A comparison of methods. Ecol. Inform. 4, 206–214 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Han, N.C., Muniandy, S.V., Dayou, J.: Acoustic classification of australian anurans based on hybrid spectral-entropy approach. Appl. Acoust. 72, 639–645 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Graciarena, M., Delplanche, M., Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., Ferrer, L.: Acoustic front-end optimization for bird species recognition. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 293–296 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Belyaeva, N.A., Yash-yee, K.L., Smartc, K.M., Ribeirod, E.: Whatfrog: A comparison of classification algorithms for automated anuran recognition

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, W.P., Chen, S.S., Lin, C.C., Chen, Y.Z., Lin, W.C.: Automatic recognition of frog calls using a multi-stage average spectrum. Comput. Math. Appl. 64, 1270–1281 (2012). Advanced Technologies in Computer, Consumer and Control

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xie, J., Towsey, M., Yasumiba, K., Zhang, J., Roe, P.: Detection of anuran calling activity in long field recordings for bio-acoustic monitoring. In: 2015 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Visual Geometry Group: Department of Engineering Science, U.o.O. Texture classification (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from National Science Foundation (NSF) grants No. 1263011 and No. 1152306. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalwinderjeet Kular .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kular, D., Hollowood, K., Ommojaro, O., Smart, K., Bush, M., Ribeiro, E. (2015). Classifying Frog Calls Using Gaussian Mixture Models. In: Bebis, G., et al. Advances in Visual Computing. ISVC 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9475. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27863-6_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27863-6_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27862-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27863-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics