Abstract
It is clear that within the field of archaeological computational modeling, the detection and reduction of uncertainty have played far too marginal a role. To highlight why it is important to grapple with such uncertainty, this concept is here treated from a broader conceptual perspective.
Perhaps most central to this endeavor is that researchers aiming to reconstruct any system, be it past or present, must confront the fact that uncertainty can never be avoided completely, as the world constitutes a place of nearly limitless possibilities. Moreover, in transforming the natural systems in which we live, we affect infinitely more dimensions of the system than we know, leading to numerous unanticipated consequences. This renders the task of analytically reconstructing the past nearly impossible. This paper discusses uncertainty in relation to traditional, reductionist science as well as with respect to complex systems science. Complex systems meet head on the issue of expanding possibilities, seeking to investigate the breadth and depth of these phenomena. In view of all this, it is argued that, rather than attempt the unattainable by reconstructing models of human reality, archaeological modelers would do well to utilize modeling as a “tool for thought” to enhance interpretations of past socio-natural processes and transform theoretical and methodological approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atlan, H. (1992). Self-organising networks: Weak, strong and intentional. The role of their underdetermination. La Nuova Critica Nuova Seria, 19–20, 51–70.
Barraclough, G. (1955). History in a changing world. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Carlson, T. (1982). Time resources, society and ecology: On the capacity for human interaction in space and time (Vol. 2). London: Unwin Hyman.
Carr, E. H. (1967). What is history? London: Vintage Books.
Collingwood, R. G. (2014). The idea of history. London: Martino Fine Books (Original Published 1946).
Mitchell, M. (2011). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Olivier, L. (2011). The dark abyss of time. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
Read, D. W., & van der Leeuw, S. E. (2009). Biology is only part of the story…. In A. C. Renfrew & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Sapient mind (pp. 33–49). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Read, D. W., & van der Leeuw, S. E. (2015). The extension of social relations in time and space during the Palaeolithic. In F. Coward, R. Hosfield, M. Pope, & F. Wenban-Smith (Eds.), Settlement, society and cognition in human evolution (pp. 31–53). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
van der Leeuw, S. E. (2004). Why model? Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 35, 117–128.
van der Leeuw, S. E. (2012). Global systems dynamics and policy: Lessons from the distant past. Complexity Economics, 1(2012), 33–60.
van der Leeuw, S. E. (2014). Transforming lessons from the past into lessons for the future. In A. F. Chase & V. Scarborough (Eds.), The resilience and vulnerability of ancient landscapes: Transforming Maya archaeology through IHOPE (Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Vol. 24, pp. 215–231). New York: Wiley.
van der Leeuw, S. E., & McGlade, J. (1997). Archaeology: Time, process and structural transformations. London: Routledge.
Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S., & Redman, C. L. (1971). Explanation in archaeology: An explicitly scientific approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). Calculus of fuzzy restrictions. In L. A. Zadeh, K. S. Fu, K. Tanaka, & M. Shimura (Eds.), Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes (pp. 1–39). New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Leeuw, S. (2016). Uncertainties. In: Brouwer Burg, M., Peeters, H., Lovis, W. (eds) Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Archaeological Computational Modeling. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27833-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27833-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27831-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27833-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)