Skip to main content

Abstract

Formal training in medicine suggests that partnerships among specialties to improve the patient’s global condition are essential. This concept is inherent to the growth of medicine and its complexity (Horst et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(10):869–75, 2015), creating the need for specialty management to keep pace. Patients need to have a visible and definable pathway to get efficient and efficacious care, with easily navigable involvement with general practitioners and subspecialties. These relationships among providers define this pathway and serve many functions, both in the clinical and business realms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Horst PK, Choo K, Bharucha N, et al. Graduates of orthopaedic residency training are increasingly subspecialized: a review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(10):869–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pope JE, Ryan N, Carlson J, et al. Pain practice development and marketing in the digital age: a case study in an office-based interventional pain practice. International Neuromodulation Society Meeting, Poster Presentation, Montreal, Canada; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quintner JL, Cohen ML, Buchanan D, et al. Pain medicine and its models: helping or hurting. Pain Med. 2008;9(7):824–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pope JE, Deer TR, McRoberts WP. Intrathecal therapy: the burden of being positioned as a salvage therapy. Pain Med. 2015;16(10):2036–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deer T, Caraway D, Wallace M. A definition of refractory pain to help determine suitability for device implantation. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(8):711–5. doi:10.1111/ner.12263.Noabstractavailable.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Healthcare Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT); Office of Inspector General; Comparison of the Anti-kickback statute and Stark Law.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Office of Inspector General, HHS. Medicare and state health care programs: fraud and abuse; electronic health records safe harbor under the anti-kickback statute. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2013;78(249):79201–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taormina M. The Stark truth: what your physician clients should know about Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute. J Health Care Finance. 2013;39(3):85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason E. Pope M.D., D.A.B.P.M., F.I.P.P. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pope, J.E. (2016). Referral Networks. In: Falowski, S., Pope, J. (eds) Integrating Pain Treatment into Your Spine Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27796-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27796-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27794-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27796-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics