Skip to main content

Revision Surgery and Alternative Treatment Options for Recurrent Pain Following Spinal Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Pain Treatment into Your Spine Practice

Abstract

Chronic low back pain represents a complex problem affecting a large percentage of the global population, with excessive costs to the health care system. While a large portion of these patients undergo surgical interventions for the treatment of degenerative spine disease, many patients still experience severe back pain and radicular symptoms following their surgery. Some of these cases merit revision surgery, yet for the remaining patients treatment can be difficult. This chapter reviews the role of revision surgery as well as alternative treatment options such as physical therapy, pain management, and neuromodulation, including spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and intrathecal pain pumps (ITP), to produce effective back and neuropathic pain relief in patients who have already undergone prior spinal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amirdelfan K, McRoberts P, Deer TR. The differential diagnosis of low back pain: a primer on the evolving paradigm. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface [Internet]. 2014;17:11–7. doi:10.1111/ner.12173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303:1259–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Hanscom B, Skinner JS, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2441–50.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Blood EA, Tosteson ANA, et al. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2015 May 23];91:1295–304. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2686131&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

  5. Elgafy H, Vaccaro AR, Chapman JR, Dvorak MF. Rationale of revision lumbar spine surgery. Glob Spine J [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2015 May 23];2:7–14. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3864481&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

  6. McAnany SJ, Baird EO, Overley SC, Kim JS, Qureshi SA, Anderson PA. A meta-analysis of the clinical and fusion results following treatment of symptomatic cervical pseudarthrosis. Glob Spine J [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 May 23];5:148–55. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4369200&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

  7. Kostuik JP. Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty. Spine J [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2015 May 23];4:289S–291S. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943004005868.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koerner JD, Kepler CK, Albert TJ. Revision surgery for failed cervical spine reconstruction: review article. HSS J [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 May 23];11:2–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25737662.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Almeida DB, Prandini MN, Awamura Y, Vitola ML, Simião MP, Milano JB, et al. Outcome following lumbar disc surgery: the role of fibrosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2015 Mar 26];150:1167–76. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18936878.

  10. Segal R, Stacey BR, Rudy TE, Baser S, Markham J. Spinal cord stimulation revisited. Neurol Res. 1998;20(5):391–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT, Piantadosi S. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: superiority of “multi-channel” devices. Pain. 1991;44:119–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Buyten JP, Linderoth B. “The failed back surgery syndrome”: definition and therapeutic algorithms—an update. Eur J Pain Suppl [Internet]. European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters; 2010;4:273–86. doi:10.1016/j.eujps.2010.09.006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. North RB, Campbell JN, James CS, Conover-Walker MK, Wang H, Piantadosi S, et al. Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation. Neurosurgery [Internet]. 1991 [cited 2015 Mar 26];28:685–90; discussion 690–1. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1831546.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fritsch EW, Heisel J, Rupp S. The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21:626–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaccaro AR, Silber JS. Post-traumatic spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:111–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Onesti ST. Failed back syndrome. Neurologist [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2015 Mar 26];10:259–64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15335443.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chan C, Peng P. Failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med. 2011;12:577–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodrigues FF, Dozza DC, De Oliveira CR, De Castro RG. Failed back surgery syndrome: casuistic and etiology. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006;64:757–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Skaf G, Bouclaous C, Alaraj A, Chamoun R. Clinical outcome of surgical treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Surg Neurol. 2005;64:483–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Veizi E, Hayek S. Interventional therapies for chronic low back pain. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface [Internet]. 2014;17:31–45. doi:10.1111/ner.12250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Long DM. Chronic adhesive spinal arachnoiditis: pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment. Neurosurg Q [Internet]. 1992;2. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery-quarterly/Fulltext/1992/12000/Chronic_Adhesive_Spinal_Arachnoiditis_.4.aspx.

  22. Ohnmeiss DD, Rashbaum RF. Patient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation for predominant complaints of chronic, intractable low back pain. Spine J. 2001;1:358–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Buyten J-P, Al-Kaisy A, Smet I, Palmisani S, Smith T. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: results of a prospective multicenter European clinical study. Neuromodulation [Internet]. 2012;16:59–65; discussion 65–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23199157.

  24. Wellington J. Noninvasive and alternative management of chronic low back pain (efficacy and outcomes). Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface [Internet]. 2014;17:24–30. doi:10.1111/ner.12078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Furlan AD, van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Tsukayama H, Lao L, Koes BW, et al. Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD001351.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Manheimer E, White A, Berman B, Forys K, Ernst E. Meta-analysis: acupuncture for low back pain. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2015 Feb 21];142:651–63. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15838072.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150:971–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg. 1967;46:489–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Deer TR, Thomson S, Pope JE, Russo M, Luscombe F, Levy R. International neuromodulation society critical assessment: guideline review of implantable neurostimulation devices. Neuromodulation [Internet]. 2014;2014:678–85. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24802237.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deer T, Skaribas I, Nelson C, Tracy J, Meloy S, Darnule A, et al. Interim results from the partnership for advancement in neuromodulation pain registry. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface [Internet]. 2013;17:656–64. doi:10.1111/ner.12154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Pampati V, Smith HS, Hirsch JA. Analysis of growth of interventional techniques in managing chronic pain in the Medicare population: a 10-year evaluation from 1997 to 2006. Pain Physician. 2009;12:9–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Deer T, Pope J, Hayek S, Narouze S, Patil P, Foreman R, et al. Neurostimulation for the treatment of axial back pain: a review of mechanisms, techniques, outcomes, and future advances. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface [Internet]. 2014;17:52–68. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00530.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Brown FD, Fessler RG, Friedman WA, Pelofsky S, et al. Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relierf of chronic back and extremity pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(23):2786–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ohnmeiss DD, Rashbaum RF, Bogdanffy GM. Prospective outcome evaluation of spinal cord stimulation in patients with intractable leg pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(11):1344–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. North RB, Kidd DH, Zahurak M, James CS, Long DM, Burchiel KJ, et al. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: experience over two decades. Neurosurgery [Internet]. 1993;32:384–95. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006123-199303000-00008&D=ovft&PDF=y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. De la Porte C, Siegfried J. Lumbosacral spinal fibrosis (spinal arachnoiditis). Its diagnosis and treatment by spinal cord stimulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8:593–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT, Kidd DH, Piantadosi S. Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up after spinal cord stimulator implantation. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:692–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar K, North R, Taylor R, Sculpher M, Van den Abeele C, Gehring M, et al. Spinal cord stimulation vs. conventional medical management: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS study). Neuromodulation [Internet]. 2005;8:213–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151547.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain. 2007;132:179–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:762–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kumar K, Toth C. The role of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain postlaminectomy. Curr Rev Pain. 1998;2:85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Buyten JP, Van Zundert J, Milbouw G. Treatment of failed back surgery syndrome patients with low back and leg pain: a pilot study of a new dual lead spinal cord stimulation system. Neuromodulation [Internet]. 1999;2:258–65. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151259.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Barolat G, Oakley JC, Law JD, North RB, Ketcik B, Sharan A. Epidural spinal cord stimulation with a multiple electrode paddle lead is effective in treating intractable low back pain. Neuromodulation. 2001;4:59–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Leveque J-C, Villavicencio AT, Bulsara KR, Rubin L, et al. Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome [Internet]. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2001 [cited 2015 Mar 26]. p. 1–9. Available from: http://journals.ohiolink.edu/ejc/article.cgi?issn=10947159&issue=v04i0001&article=1_scsffbss.

  45. Kumar K, Wilson JR, Taylor RS, Gupta S. Complications of spinal cord stimulation, suggestions to improve outcome, and financial impact. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5:191–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Derby R, Schultz DM, Benyamin RM, Prager JP, et al. Reassessment of evidence synthesis of occupational medicine practice guidelines for interventional pain management. Pain Physician [Internet]. 2008;11:393–482. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18690276.

  47. Collett B, Collins D, Eldridge P, et al. Spinal Cord Stimulation for the management of pain: recommendations for best clinical practice. In: Simpson KR, Stannard C, Raphael J, editors. A consensus document prepared on behalf of the British Pain Society in consultation with the Society of British Neurological Surgeons. London: The British Pain Society; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mailis A, Taenzer P. Evidence-based guideline for neuropathic pain interventional treatments: spinal cord stimulation, intravenous infusions, epidural injections and nerve blocks. Pain Res Manag [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2015 Feb 25];17:150–8. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3401085&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

  49. Frey ME, Manchikanti L, Benyamin RM, Schultz DM, Smith HS, Cohen SP. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review. Pain Physician [Internet]. 2009;12:379–97. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19305486.

  50. Airaksinen O, Herno A, Turunen V, Saari T, Suomlainen O. Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2015 Mar 26];22:2278–82. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9346149.

  51. Eldabe S, Kumar K, Buchser E, Taylor RS. An analysis of the components of pain, function, and health-related quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome treated with spinal cord stimulation or conventional medical management. Neuromodulation. 2010;13:201–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Leong M, et al. The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the neuromodulation appropriateness consensus committee. Neuromodulation. 2014;17:515–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. North R, Shipley J, Prager J, Barolat G, Barulich M, Bedder M, et al. Practice parameters for the use of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. Pain Med [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2015 May 17];8 Suppl 4:S200–75. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17995571.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Williams KA, Gonzalez-Fernandez M, Hamzehzadeh S, Wilkinson I, Erdek MA, Plunkett A, et al. A multi-center analysis evaluating factors associated with spinal cord stimulation outcome in chronic pain patients. Pain Med. 2011;12:1142–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bennett G, Burchiel K, Buchser E, Classen A, Deer T, Du Pen S, et al. Clinical guidelines for intraspinal infusion: report of an expert panel. PolyAnalgesic Consensus Conference 2000. J Pain Symptom Manage [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2015 May 23];20:S37–43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10989256.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, Schultz DM, Hansen HC, Abdi S, et al. Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2007;10:7–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer A. Sweet M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scoco, A., Miller, J.P., Sweet, J.A. (2016). Revision Surgery and Alternative Treatment Options for Recurrent Pain Following Spinal Surgery. In: Falowski, S., Pope, J. (eds) Integrating Pain Treatment into Your Spine Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27796-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27796-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27794-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27796-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics