Skip to main content

Microbiology of Infective Endocarditis and Microbiologic Diagnosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Endocarditis

Abstract

The microbiology of infective endocarditis (IE) has evolved significantly over the last century. Previously a community-acquired disease affecting predominantly patients with rheumatic heart disease, IE is now being seen in new populations including IV drug users, patients with prosthetic valves, and patients infected through healthcare associated bacteremia. Improved blood culture technologies and non-culture laboratory methods have also resulted in a lower rate of culture-negative cases. Because of differing proportions of particular risk groups, the etiologic agents responsible for causing infective endocarditis vary significantly among continents, countries, regions within countries and even between different years in an individual hospital.

Blood culture remains the single most important investigation in a patient suspected of having infective endocarditis. If appropriately collected prior to antibiotic administration, blood cultures can be expected to yield growth of the causative organism in over 90 % of cases of infective endocarditis. Serologic testing can be useful in determining the cause of IE in true culture-negative cases, which are usually caused by organisms that are difficult to culture including Coxiella burnetti, Bartonella spp., Chlamydia spp. and Legionella species. In spite of limitations including the potential presence of PCR inhibitors in clinical samples and the possibility of sample to sample contamination, molecular amplification methods can be useful in establishing the cause of IE. To date, PCR methods have been applied with most success to surgically excised valve tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cabell CH, Abrutyn E. Progress toward a global understanding of infective endocarditis. Early lessons from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis investigation. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2002;16(2):255–72, vii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Murdoch DR, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(5):463–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mylonakis E, Calderwood SB. Infective endocarditis in adults. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(18):1318–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moreillon P, Que YA. Infective endocarditis. Lancet. 2004;363(9403):139–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Slipczuk L, et al. Infective endocarditis epidemiology over five decades: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82665. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082665.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tleyjeh IM, et al. Temporal trends in infective endocarditis: a population-based study in Olmsted County Minnesota. JAMA. 2005;293(24):3022–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tleyjeh IM, et al. A systematic review of population-based studies of infective endocarditis. Chest. 2007;132:1025–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miro JM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus native valve infective endocarditis: report of 566 episodes from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(4):507–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fowler Jr VG, et al. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress. JAMA. 2005;293(24):3012–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Federspiel JJ, et al. Increasing US rates of endocarditis with Staphylococcus aureus: 1999–2008. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(4):363–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hill EE, et al. Methicillin-resistant versus methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27:445–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bor DH, et al. Infective endocarditis in the U.S., 1998–2009: a nationwide study. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60033. doi:10.1271/journal.pone.0060033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chu VH, et al. Native valve endocarditis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci: report of 99 episodes from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(10):1527–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chu VH, et al. Emergence of coagulase-negative staphylococci as a cause of native valve endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:232–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chu VH, et al. Coagulase-negative staphyloccal prosthetic valve endocarditis – a contemporary update based on the International Collaboration on Endocarditis: prospective cohort study. Heart. 2009;95:570–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seenivasan MH, Yu VL. Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditis – the hidden peril of coagulase-negative staphylococcus in blood cultures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;22(8):489–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baddour LM, et al. Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association – executive summary: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Circulation. 2005;111(23):3167–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoen B, et al. Emergence of endocarditis due to group D streptococci: findings derived from the merged database of the International Collaboration on Endocarditis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;24(1):12–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindberg J, et al. Incidence of pneumococcal endocarditis: a regional health register-based study in Denmark 1981–1996. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37(6–7):417–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernandez-Guerrero ML, et al. Nosocomial enterococcal endocarditis: a serious hazard for hospitalized patients with enterococcal bacteraemia. J Intern Med. 2002;252(6):510–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mandell GL. Enterococcal endocarditis: an analysis of 38 patients observed at the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center. Arch Intern Med. 1970;125(2):258–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McDonald JR, et al. Enterococcal endocarditis: 107 cases from the international collaboration on endocarditis merged database. Am J Med. 2005;118(7):759–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chirouze C, et al. Enterococcal endocarditis in the beginning of the 21st century: analysis from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis – prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:1140–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chamber ST, et al. HACEK infective endocarditis: characteristics and outcomes from a large, multi-national cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63181. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Karchmer AW, Longworth DL. Infections of intracardiac devices. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2002;16(2):477–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang A, et al. Contemporary clinical profile and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA. 2007;297(12):1354–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rivas P, et al. The impact of hospital-acquired infections on the microbial etiology and prognosis of late-onset prosthetic valve endocarditis. Chest. 2005;128(2):764–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown PD, Levine DP. Infective endocarditis in the injection drug user. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2002;16(3):645–65, viii-ix.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mathew J, et al. Value of echocardiographic findings in predicting cardiovascular complications in infective endocarditis. Angiology. 2001;52(12):801–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miro JM, et al. Infective endocarditis in intravenous drug abusers and HIV-1 infected patients. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 1997;16(2):273–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saydain GM, et al. Outcome of patients with injection drug use-associated endocarditis admitted to an intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2010;25:248–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Komshian SV, et al. Characteristics of left-sided endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Detroit Medical Center. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12(4):693–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mills J, Drew D. Serratia marcescens endocarditis: a regional illness associated with intravenous drug abuse. Ann Intern Med. 1976;84(1):29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Scoy RE. Culture-negative endocarditis. Mayo Clin Proc. 1982;57(3):149–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bouza E, et al. Infective endocarditis – a prospective study at the end of the twentieth century: new predisposing conditions, new etiologic agents, and still a high mortality. Medicine (Baltimore). 2001;80(5):298–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Werner M, et al. A clinical study of culture-negative endocarditis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003;82(4):263–73.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zamorano J, et al. Differences between endocarditis with true negative blood cultures and those with previous antibiotic treatment. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003;12(2):256–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Madico GE, Rice PA. 16s-Ribosomal DNA to diagnose culture-negative endocarditis. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2008;10:280–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Houpikian P, Raoult D. Blood culture-negative endocarditis in a reference center: etiologic diagnosis of 348 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2005;84(3):162–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brouqui P, Raoult D. Endocarditis due to rare and fastidious bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14(1):177–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Casalta JP, et al. Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii and Bartonella species as cases of infective endocarditis in Marseilles (1994–2007). Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;15 Suppl 2:152–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fournier PE, et al. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of Bartonella quintana and Bartonella henselae endocarditis: a study of 48 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2001;80(4):245–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fenollar F, Lepidi H, Raoult D. Whipple’s endocarditis: review of the literature and comparisons with Q fever, Bartonella infection, and blood culture-positive endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(8):1309–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Geissdörfer W, et al. High frequency of Tropheryma whipplei in culture-negative endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(2):216–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rognon R, Kehtari R, Francioli P. Individual value of each of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1999;5(7):396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li J, Plorde JJ, Carlson LG. Effects of volume and periodicity on blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32(11):2829–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Towns ML, Reller LB. Diagnostic methods current best practices and guidelines for isolation of bacteria and fungi in infective endocarditis. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2002;16(2):363–76, ix-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Houpikian P, Raoult D. Diagnostic methods current best practices and guidelines for identification of difficult-to-culture pathogens in infective endocarditis. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2002;16(2):377–92, x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gauduchon V, et al. Molecular diagnosis of infective endocarditis by PCR amplification and direct sequencing of DNA from valve tissue. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(2):763–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen E. Sanche MD, FRCPC .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skinner, S., Wudel, B., Sanche, S.E. (2016). Microbiology of Infective Endocarditis and Microbiologic Diagnosis. In: Chan, KL., Embil, J. (eds) Endocarditis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27784-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27784-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27782-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27784-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics