Abstract
Vegetation within stormwater ponds varies seasonly and its presence affects the flow field, which in turn affects the pond’s Residence Time Distribution and its effectiveness at pollutant removal. Vegetated flows are complex and, as a result, few suitable tools exist for evaluating realistic stormwater pond designs. Recent research has suggested using a porous zone to represent vegetation within a CFD model, and this paper investigates the feasibility of this approach using ANSYS Fluent. One of the main benefits of using a porous zone is the ability to derive the relevant parameters from the known physical characteristics of stem diameter and porosity using the Ergun equation. A sensitivity analysis on the viscous resistance factor \(1/\alpha\) and the inertial resistance factor \(C_{2}\) has been undertaken by comparing model results to data collected from an experimental vegetated channel. Best fit values of \(C_{2}\) were obtained for a range of flow conditions including emergent and submerged vegetation. Results show the CFD model to be insensitive to \(1/\alpha\) but very sensitive to values of \(C_{2}\). For submerged vegetation, values of \(C_{2}\) derived from the Ergun equation are under-predictions of best-fit \(C_{2}\) values as only the turbulence due to the shear layer is represented. The porous zone approach does not take into account turbulence generated from stem wakes such that no meaningful predictions for emergent vegetation were obtained. \(C_{2}\) values calculated using a force balance show better agreement with best-fit \(C_{2}\) values than those derived from the Ergun equation. Manually fixing values of \(k\) and \(\varepsilon\) within the porous zone of the model shows initial promise as a means of taking stem wakes into account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvarado A, Vesvikar M, Cisneros JF, Maere T, Goethals P, Nopens I (2013) CFD study to determine the optimal configuration of aerators in a full-scale waste stabilization pond. Water Res 47(13):4528–4537
ANSYS Inc (2012) ANSYS Fluent 14.5. Cecil Township, PA
Ergun S (1952) Fluid flow through packed columns. Chem Eng Prog 48:89–94
Hoffmann MR (2004) Application of a simple space-time averaged porous media model to flow in densely vegetated channels. J Porous Media 7(3)
Holland JF, Martin JF, Granata T, Bouchard V, Quigley M, Brown L (2004) Effects of wetland depth and flow rate on residence time distribution characteristics. Ecol Eng 23(3):189–203
Huang YH, Saiers JE, Harvey JW, Noe GB, Mylon S (2008) Advection, dispersion, and filtration of fine particles within emergent vegetation of the florida everglades. Water Resour Res 44(4)
Fluent Inc (1998) FLUENT 5 user’s guide, vol I. Lebanon, NH
Jadhav RS, Buchberger SG (1995) Effects of vegetation on flow through free water surface wetlands. Ecol Eng 5(4):481–496
Kadlec RH (1990) Overland flow in wetlands: vegetation resistance. J Hydraul Eng 116(5):691–706
Khan S, Melville BW, Shamseldin AY, Fischer C (2012) Investigation of flow patterns in storm water retention ponds using CFD. J Environ Eng 139(1):61–69
King A, Tinoco R, Cowen E (2012) A k–ε turbulencemodel based on the scales of vertical shear and stem wakes valid for emergent and submerged vegetated flows. J Fluid Mech 701:1–39
Kjellin J, Wörman A, Johansson H, Lindahl A (2007) Controlling factors for water residence time and flow patterns in Ekeby treatment wetland Sweden. Adv Water Resour 30(4):838–850
Levenspiel O (1972) Chemical reaction engineering. Wiley
Li Q (2014) Effects of vegetation on pond residence time distributions using CFD modelling Master’s thesis, University of Sheffield
Lightbody AF, Nepf HM (2006) Prediction of velocity profiles and longitudinal dispersion in emergent salt marsh vegetation. Limnol Oceanogr 51(1):218–228
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290
Nepf H (1999) Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 35(2):479–489
Patil S, Singh V (2011) Dispersion model for varying vertical shear in vegetated channels. J Hydraul Eng 137(10):1293–1297
Persson J (2000) The hydraulic performance of ponds of various layouts. Urban Water 2(3):243–250
Persson J (2005) The use of design elements in wetlands. Nord Hydrol 36(2):113–120
Peterson EL, Harris JA, Wadhwa LC (2000) CFD modelling pond dynamic processes. Aquacult Eng 23(1):61–93
Saggiori S (2010) CFD modelling of solute transport in vegetated flow. Master’s thesis, University of Sheffield
Shilton A (2000) Potential application of computational fluid dynamics to pond design. Water Sci Technol 42(10):327–334
Shilton A, Kreegher S, Grigg N (2008) Comparison of computation fluid dynamics simulation against tracer data from a scale model and full-sized waste stabilization pond. J Environ Eng 134(10):845–850
Shucksmith J, Boxall J, Guymer I (2010) Effects of emergent and submerged natural vegetation on longitudinal mixing in open channel flow. Water Resour Res 46(4)
Souliotis D, Prinos P (2011) Effect of a vegetation patch on turbulent channel flow. J Hydraul Res 49(2):157–167
Stoesser T, Kim S, Diplas P (2010) Turbulent flow through idealized emergent vegetation. J Hydraul Eng 136(12):1003–1017
Stovin VR, Grimm JP, Lau STD (2008) Solute transport modeling for urban drainage structures. J Environ Eng 134(8):640–650
Tanino Y, Nepf HM (2008) Lateral dispersion in random cylinder arrays at high reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 600:339–371
Tsavdaris A, Mitchell S, Williams B (2013) Use of CFD to model emergent vegetation in detention ponds. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 8(7):495–503
Tsavdaris A, Mitchell S, Williams JB (2014) Computational fluid dynamics modelling of different detention pond configurations in the interest of sustainable flow regimes and gravity sedimentation potential. Water Environ J
Wu W, He Z (2009) Effects of vegetation on flow conveyance and sediment transport capacity. Int J Sedim Res 24(3):247–259
Zinke P (2010) Flow resistance parameters for natural emergent vegetation derived from a porous media model. In: Proceedings of RiverFlow 2010
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by EPSRC grants EP/K024442/1 and EP/K025589/1. The authors are grateful to Dr. James Shucksmith for access to the experimental data used in this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sonnenwald, F., Stovin, V., Guymer, I. (2016). Feasibility of the Porous Zone Approach to Modelling Vegetation in CFD. In: Rowiński, P., Marion, A. (eds) Hydrodynamic and Mass Transport at Freshwater Aquatic Interfaces. GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27750-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27750-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27749-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27750-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)