Abstract
Let \(S =\varGamma \setminus \mathcal{H}\) be a compact hyperbolic surface (or more generally, of finite area). In this last chapter we shall study the following conjecture.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The appearance of the word “quantum” here is explained in the first subsection.
- 2.
I.e., the corresponding set of gradient vectors is linearly independent at almost every point of \(\mathcal{H}\).
- 3.
The coordinates w and \(\overline{w}\) are natural here since we then have \(H = \frac{1} {2}w\overline{w}\).
- 4.
This paragraph is not needed for what comes after it. We shall freely use the ergodicity of the geodesic flow as well as the L 2 Birkhoff theorem, see [50].
- 5.
Note that this is the first time we are invoking the ergodicity of the geodesic flow.
- 6.
This type of property rigidifies the situation.
- 7.
We use here the term ergodic without entering into the details. See later sections or [50] for a definition.
- 8.
The fixed points of matrices in \(\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbf{Z}\left [1/p\right ])\) form a countable set.
- 9.
Thus, even a precise control on the geodesic flow over an interval [0, T] cannot lead to an estimation on ρ(γ 1(2T), γ 2(2T)) (other than that implied by the triangle inequality). The future is independent of the past; this is a very simple manifestation of deterministic chaos.
References
Nalini Anantharaman, Entropy and the localization of eigenfunctions, Ann. of Math. (2) 168 (2008), no. 2, 435–475.
V. I. Arnol′d, Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 60, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989, Translated from the 1974 Russian original by K. Vogtmann and A. Weinstein.
Tim Bedford, Michael Keane, and Caroline Series (eds.), Ergodic theory, symbolic dynamics, and hyperbolic spaces (Trieste, April 17–28, 1989), Oxford Science Publications, New York, The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, 1991.
Jean Bourgain and Elon Lindenstrauss, Entropy of quantum limits, Comm. Math. Phys. 233 (2003), no. 1, 153–171.
Yves Colin de Verdière, Ergodicité et fonctions propres du laplacien, Comm. Math. Phys. 102 (1985), no. 3, 497–502.
Harry Furstenberg, Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximation, Math. Systems Theory 1 (1967), 1–49.
Paul R. Halmos, Measure Theory, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1950.
Boris Hasselblatt and Anatole Katok, A first course in dynamics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.
Bernard Host, Nombres normaux, entropie, translations, Israel J. Math. 91 (1995), no. 1–3, 419–428.
Elon Lindenstrauss, Invariant measures and arithmetic quantum unique ergodicity, Ann. of Math. (2) 163 (2006), no. 1, 165–219.
André Martinez, An introduction to semiclassical and microlocal analysis, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
Didier Robert, Autour de l’approximation semi-classique, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 68, Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1987.
Zeév Rudnick and Peter Sarnak, The behaviour of eigenstates of arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds, Comm. Math. Phys. 161 (1994), no. 1, 195–213.
Daniel J. Rudolph, × 2 and × 3 invariant measures and entropy, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 10 (1990), no. 2, 395–406.
Jean-Pierre Serre, Arbres, amalgames, SL2, Astérisque, vol. 46, Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 1977.
Lior Silberman and Akshay Venkatesh, On quantum unique ergodicity for locally symmetric spaces, Geom. Funct. Anal. 17 (2007), no. 3, 960–998.
A. I. Šnirel′man, Ergodic properties of eigenfunctions, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 29 (1974), no. 6(180), 181–182.
Kannan Soundararajan, Quantum unique ergodicity for \(\mathrm{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z})\setminus \mathbb{H}\), Ann. of Math. (2) 172 (2010), no. 2, 1529–1538.
E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, Semiclassical limits for the hyperbolic plane, Duke Math. J. 108 (2001), no. 3, 449–509.
Steven Zelditch, Uniform distribution of eigenfunctions on compact hyperbolic surfaces, Duke Math. J. 55 (1987), no. 4, 919–941.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bergeron, N. (2016). Arithmetic Quantum Unique Ergodicity. In: The Spectrum of Hyperbolic Surfaces. Universitext. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27666-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27666-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27664-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27666-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)