Skip to main content

Lumbar Disk Herniation: Endoscopic and Microsurgical Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgery of the Spine and Spinal Cord

Abstract

Lumbar disc herniation is one of the most common conditions encountered by spine surgeons in clinical practice. Patients with lumbar disc herniations usually present with back pain and radicular pain due to compression/inflammation of the exiting nerve root by the protruded disc material. They present with a specific low back pain; besides the low back pain, there is a neurological symptom. The kind of pain is mostly a combination of axial nociceptive/neuropathic pain in combination with radicular pain, sometimes neuropathic. As such, since in most cases medical imaging offers a clear indication of the nature and the cause of the pain, a firm diagnosis can usually be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE (2009) Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 27:E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Castro I, Santos DP, Christoph Dde H, Landeiro JA (2005) The history of spinal surgery for disc disease: an illustrated timeline. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 63:701–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parisien RC, Ball PA (1998) William Jason Mixter (1880–1958). Ushering in the “dynasty of the disc”. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:2363–2366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maroon JC (2002) Current concepts in minimally invasive discectomy. Neurosurgery 51:S137–S145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Faubert C, Caspar W (1991) Lumbar percutaneous discectomy. Initial experience in 28 cases. Neuroradiology 33:407–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Foley KT, Smith MM (1997) Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3:301–307

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wong AP, Shih P, Smith TR, Slimack NP, Dahdaleh NS, Aoun SG, El Ahmadieh TY, Smith ZA, Scheer JK, Koski TR, Liu JC, Fessler RG (2014) Comparison of symptomatic cerebral spinal fluid leak between patients undergoing minimally invasive versus open lumbar foraminotomy, discectomy, or laminectomy. World Neurosurg 81:634–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J (2008) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2789–2800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T, Deyo RA (2006) Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA 296:2451–2459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Zhao W, Morgan TS, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Weinstein JN (2014) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8:131–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamper SJ, Ostelo RW, Rubinstein SM, Nellensteijn JM, Peul WC, Arts MP, van Tulder MW (2014) Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 23:1021–1043

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee P, Liu JC, Fessler RG (2011) Perioperative results following open and minimally invasive single-level lumbar discectomy. J Clin Neurosci: Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 18:1667–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA (1999) Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med 340:418–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofstee DJ, Gijtenbeek JM, Hoogland PH, van Houwelingen HC, Kloet A, Lotters F, Tans JT (2002) Westeinde sciatica trial: randomized controlled study of bed rest and physiotherapy for acute sciatica. J Neurosurg 96:45–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Awad JN, Moskovich R (2006) Lumbar disc herniations: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:183–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Osterman H, Seitsalo S, Karppinen J, Malmivaara A (2006) Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2409–2414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT, Thomeer RT, Koes BW (2007) Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med 356:2245–2256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peul WC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Thomeer RT, Koes BW, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study G (2008) Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 336:1355–1358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Hanscom B, Skinner JS, Abdu WA, Hilibrand AS, Boden SD, Deyo RA (2006) Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA 296:2441–2450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Henriksen L, Schmidt K, Eskesen V, Jantzen E (1996) A controlled study of microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy. Br J Neurosurg 10:289–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lagarrigue J, Chaynes P (1994) Comparative study of disk surgery with or without microscopy. A prospective study of 80 cases. Neurochirurgie 40:116–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Katayama Y, Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, Sakai Y, Nakamura H, Nakashima S, Ito Z, Ishiguro N (2006) Comparison of surgical outcomes between macro discectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:344–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tullberg T, Isacson J, Weidenhielm L (1993) Does microscopic removal of lumbar disc herniation lead to better results than the standard procedure? Results of a one-year randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:24–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van den Hout WB, Peul WC, Koes BW, Brand R, Kievit J, Thomeer RT, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study G (2008) Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 336:1351–1354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Arts MP, Brand R, van den Akker ME, Koes BW, Bartels RH, Peul WC, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study G (2009) Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302:149–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Righesso O, Falavigna A, Avanzi O (2007) Comparison of open discectomy with microendoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniations: results of a randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery 61:545–549; discussion 549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryang YM, Oertel MF, Mayfrank L, Gilsbach JM, Rohde V (2008) Standard open microdiscectomy versus minimal access trocar microdiscectomy: results of a prospective randomized study. Neurosurgery 62:174–181; discussion 181–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chatterjee S, Foy PM, Findlay GF (1995) Report of a controlled clinical trial comparing automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy in the treatment of contained lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:734–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mayer HM, Brock M (1993) Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. J Neurosurg 78:216–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard G. Fessler MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Video 28.1

N, kan je dit checken (WMV 239767 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tan, L.A., Gerard, C.S., Snyder, L.A., Fessler, R.G. (2016). Lumbar Disk Herniation: Endoscopic and Microsurgical Treatment. In: van de Kelft, E. (eds) Surgery of the Spine and Spinal Cord. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27613-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27613-7_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27611-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27613-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics