Skip to main content

Re-searching Methods in Educational Research: A Transdisciplinary Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complex Dynamical Systems in Education

Abstract

Educational research has arrived at a critical juncture in its ability to address the most intractable problems of public education. While critics point to the lack of impact educational research has had on policy and practice as evidence that the problem lies in a commitment of educational researchers to make a difference in the real context of schools, there is a more fundamental flaw with our ability to conduct meaningful educational research that requires a shift in our thinking about the goals of educational research. The flaw is in a logical system that attempts to reduce complexity, eliminates outliers, assumes that students fall along a normal curve, and infers causality as relationships unfold. To address the problems of education, our research needs to “step out” of our current consciousness and approach the challenges from a different kind of understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, H. H. (1994). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Robust designs for scalability. In L. Moller, J. B. Huett, & D. M. Harvey (Eds.), Learning and instructional technologies for the 21st century (pp. 27–48). New York, USA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doll, W. E. (2005). The culture of method. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Truett, & J. St. Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture: A conversation (pp. 21–75). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleener, M. J. (1995). A survey of mathematics teachers’ attitudes about the calculator: The impact of philosophical orientation. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 14(4), 481–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleener, M. J. (2002). Curriculum dynamics: Recreating heart. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleener, M. J. (2004). Why mathematics?: Poststructural topologies and negative spaces. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleener, M. J., Carter, A., & Reeder, S. (2004). Language games in the mathematics classroom: Teaching a way of life. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(4), 445–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, C. (2005). To journey into creativity. Dissertation, University of Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Corn, J., Bryant, L., & Faber, M. (2015). Applying a scale research framework to an NSF math science partnership grant. Paper presented at the Conference on Using Continuous Improvement to Integrate Design, Implementation and Scale-Up, National Center on Scaling Up Effective Schools, Retrieved October 7–9, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, T. (1998). The differences in theory that matter in the practice of school improvement. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewett, L. (2005). Minding culture. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Truett, & J. St. Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture: A conversation (pp. 277–297). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jörg, T. (2011). New thinking in complexity for the social sciences and humanities: A transdisciplinary approach. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. (2011). Making transitions: A multiple case study of mathematics classroom teaching reform in China. Dissertation, Louisiana State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. (1980). Introduction. In H. Maturana and F. Varela, Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living.Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCammon, L. (2011). Why I flipped my classroom. (video, found at http://www.fi.ncsu.edu/selected-resources/why-i-flipped-my-classroom/).

  • Montuori, A. (2005). Gregory Bateson and the challenge of transdisciplinarity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 12(1–2), 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (2008). Foreword: Edgar Morin’s path of complexity. In E. Morin (Ed.), On complexity (pp. vii–xliv). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.. Robin Postel, Trans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2008). On complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.. Robin Postel, Trans.

    Google Scholar 

  • P21. (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved September 14, 2015 from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.

  • Truett, D. (2005). Watercourses: From poetic to poietic. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Truett, & J. St. Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture: A conversation (pp. 77–99). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umpleby, S. A., & Dent, E. B. (1999). The origins and purposes of several traditions in systems theory and cybernetics. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 30, 79–103. Retrieved September 14, 2015 from http://www.gwu.edu/~umpleby/recent_papers/1998_origins_purposes_several_traditions_systems_theory_cybernetic_1.htm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikimedia Commons. (2015). Image of Sierpinski triangle. Retrieved September 14, 2015 from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sierpinski1.png.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: MacMillan. G.E.M. Anscombe (Trans.).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Jayne Fleener .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fleener, M.J. (2016). Re-searching Methods in Educational Research: A Transdisciplinary Approach. In: Koopmans, M., Stamovlasis, D. (eds) Complex Dynamical Systems in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27575-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27577-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics