Abstract
Educational research has arrived at a critical juncture in its ability to address the most intractable problems of public education. While critics point to the lack of impact educational research has had on policy and practice as evidence that the problem lies in a commitment of educational researchers to make a difference in the real context of schools, there is a more fundamental flaw with our ability to conduct meaningful educational research that requires a shift in our thinking about the goals of educational research. The flaw is in a logical system that attempts to reduce complexity, eliminates outliers, assumes that students fall along a normal curve, and infers causality as relationships unfold. To address the problems of education, our research needs to “step out” of our current consciousness and approach the challenges from a different kind of understanding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Dutton.
Bauer, H. H. (1994). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Robust designs for scalability. In L. Moller, J. B. Huett, & D. M. Harvey (Eds.), Learning and instructional technologies for the 21st century (pp. 27–48). New York, USA: Springer.
Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.
Doll, W. E. (2005). The culture of method. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Truett, & J. St. Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture: A conversation (pp. 21–75). New York: Peter Lang.
Fleener, M. J. (1995). A survey of mathematics teachers’ attitudes about the calculator: The impact of philosophical orientation. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 14(4), 481–498.
Fleener, M. J. (2002). Curriculum dynamics: Recreating heart. New York: Peter Lang.
Fleener, M. J. (2004). Why mathematics?: Poststructural topologies and negative spaces. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Fleener, M. J., Carter, A., & Reeder, S. (2004). Language games in the mathematics classroom: Teaching a way of life. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(4), 445–468.
Forehand, C. (2005). To journey into creativity. Dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Freeman, S., Corn, J., Bryant, L., & Faber, M. (2015). Applying a scale research framework to an NSF math science partnership grant. Paper presented at the Conference on Using Continuous Improvement to Integrate Design, Implementation and Scale-Up, National Center on Scaling Up Effective Schools, Retrieved October 7–9, 2015.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking.
Hatch, T. (1998). The differences in theory that matter in the practice of school improvement. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 3–31.
Jewett, L. (2005). Minding culture. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Truett, & J. St. Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture: A conversation (pp. 277–297). New York: Peter Lang.
Jörg, T. (2011). New thinking in complexity for the social sciences and humanities: A transdisciplinary approach. Berlin: Springer.
Lu, L. (2011). Making transitions: A multiple case study of mathematics classroom teaching reform in China. Dissertation, Louisiana State University.
Maturana, H. (1980). Introduction. In H. Maturana and F. Varela, Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: Reidel.
Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living.Boston: Reidel.
McCammon, L. (2011). Why I flipped my classroom. (video, found at http://www.fi.ncsu.edu/selected-resources/why-i-flipped-my-classroom/).
Montuori, A. (2005). Gregory Bateson and the challenge of transdisciplinarity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 12(1–2), 147–158.
Montuori, A. (2008). Foreword: Edgar Morin’s path of complexity. In E. Morin (Ed.), On complexity (pp. vii–xliv). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.. Robin Postel, Trans.
Morin, E. (2008). On complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.. Robin Postel, Trans.
P21. (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved September 14, 2015 from http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.
Truett, D. (2005). Watercourses: From poetic to poietic. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Truett, & J. St. Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum and culture: A conversation (pp. 77–99). New York: Peter Lang.
Umpleby, S. A., & Dent, E. B. (1999). The origins and purposes of several traditions in systems theory and cybernetics. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 30, 79–103. Retrieved September 14, 2015 from http://www.gwu.edu/~umpleby/recent_papers/1998_origins_purposes_several_traditions_systems_theory_cybernetic_1.htm.
Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wikimedia Commons. (2015). Image of Sierpinski triangle. Retrieved September 14, 2015 from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sierpinski1.png.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: MacMillan. G.E.M. Anscombe (Trans.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fleener, M.J. (2016). Re-searching Methods in Educational Research: A Transdisciplinary Approach. In: Koopmans, M., Stamovlasis, D. (eds) Complex Dynamical Systems in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27575-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27577-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)