Skip to main content

Project Orientation in Institutions of the Public Sector: Key Methodological Assumptions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics - Vol. 2

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 3/2))

  • 976 Accesses

Abstract

Project Management Method (PM) is a holistic approach, defining contextual, procedural and behavioral aspects of project performance. Its genesis could be associated with the Manhattan Project (construction of the atomic bomb), and thus the time of World War II. In the 1960s PM was spreading in business ventures, especially in the developed countries of Western Europe and the USA. In today’s world, the following approaches are popular—linear: IPMA, PMI and PRINCE2 and light, based on the AGILE manifesto (e.g., Scrum). The aim of this paper is, to present chosen methodological assumptions of the implementation of project orientation in institutions of public administration. It focuses on the model of the project life cycle, confronting the assumptions of the method (mainly the requirements for the techniques of initiation, planning and controlling) with the conditions of the implementation, in terms of the Polish public administration. In the article a case study method of research was employed, referring to certain aspects of the implementation of the pilot project orientation, in one of the localities in southern Poland. Acceptance of the project orientation of public administration institutions should be treated as an innovation process, which is a response to the current challenges of the environment. It means often introducing a specific solution in many areas of the organization. In local government, this type of solution allows for the implementation of effective planning and controlling, at both the strategic and operational levels. Additionally, it promotes financial management through the judicious use of so-called task budgeting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The author was the project manager on the contractor site. He was responsible, among others, for the preparation and implementation of the objectives of project orientation, including the models of both the program and project phases.

References

  • Aderibigbe, A. M., & Olla, J. O. (2014). Towards a theoretical definition of public administration. Journal of Business and Management, 16(3), 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. S., & Jessen, S. A. (2003). Project maturity in organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 457–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bober, J., Hausner, J., Izdebski, H., Lachiewicz, W., Mazur, S., Nelicki, A., Nowotarski, B., Puzyna, W., Surówka, K., Zachariasz, I., & Zawicki, M. (2013). Narastające dysfunkcje, zasadnicze dylematy, konieczne działania. Raport o stanie samorządności terytorialnej w Polsce [The growing dysfunction, the fundamental dilemmas, necessary actionsThe report on the state of local government in Poland. Krakow: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes N., & Clark R. (2009). Using maturity models to improve project management practice (online). Accessed March 2, 2015, from http://pomsmeetings.org/ConfProceedings/011/FullPapers/011-0288.pdf

  • District Act. (1998). Warsaw: Parliment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuessinger, E. (2006). Maturities of project-oriented companies of about 15 project-oriented nations (online). Accessed July 26, 2015, from http://www.icoste.org/Slovenia2006Papers/icecFinal00100.pdf

  • Gareis, R. (2005). Happy projects! Vienna: Manz.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Project Management Association (IPMA). (2013). IPMA organizational competence baseline—The standard for moving organizations forward. Zurich: IPMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jugdev, K., & Muller, R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evoluting understanding of project success. Project Management Journal, 36(4), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner, H. R. (2011). Using the project management maturity model: Strategic planning for project management. New York, OH: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling (11th ed.). New York, OH: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, Y. H. (2003). A brief history of project management. In G. Carayannis, Y. H. Kwak, & F. T. Anbari (Eds.), The story of managing projects. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lianyinga, L., Jinga, H., & Xinxinga, Z. (2012). The project management maturity model and application based on PRINCE2. Procedia Engineering, 29, 3691–3697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misiag, J., Misiag, W., & Tomalak, M. (2013). Ocena efektywności wykorzystania pomocy finansowej Unii Europejskiej jako instrumentu polityki spójności społeczno-gospodarczej oraz poprawy warunków życia [The assessment of efficiency of use of the European Union financial assistance, as an instrument of policy, socio-economic cohesion and improvement of living conditions]. Rzeszow: Wyższa Szkoła Informatyki i Zarządzania w Rzeszowie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Municipality Act. (1990). Warsaw: Parliment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns, A. K., & Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2009). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2 . London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K., & Prescott, J. E. (1990). Planning and tactical factors in project implementation success. Journal of Management Studies, 27(3), 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute (PMI). (2003). Organizational project management maturity model (OPM3 ® ) (3rd ed.). Newtown Square, PI: PMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute (PMI). (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK ® Guide) (5th ed.). Newtown Square, PI: PMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pūlmanis, E. (2014). Public sector project management efficiency problems, case of Latvia. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 3(11), 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raza Abbas Shah, S., Zahid Khan, A., & Shahid Khail, M. (2011). Project management practices in e-government projects: A case study of electronic government directorate (EDG) in Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodney, T. J., & Muller, R. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, T., & Hussein, S. (2014). The history of project management. International Journal of Management & Information Systems, 18(4), 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of the project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strojny J. (2011). Podręcznik planowania i zarządzania zadaniami [The manual of the tasks planning and managing] (online). Accessed March 04, 2015, from http://nowotarski.pl/projekty-fundusze-europejskie/dokumenty/dokumenty-i-opracowania-157.html

  • Strojny, J. (2012). Innowacyjne zarządzanie regionem, powiatem i gmin [The innovative management of the region, district an municipality]. Rzeszow: Politechnika Rzeszowska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surówka, K. (2014). Samorząd terytorialny w Polsce w dobie spowolnienia gospodarczego [Local government in Poland in times of the economic slowdown]. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 37(1/2014), 366–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szewczuk, A., Kogut-Jaworska, M., & Zioło, M. (2011). Rozwój lokalny i regionalny [Regional and local development]. Warsaw: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2006). Definition of basic concepts and terminologies in governance and public administration. Economic and Social Council, E/C.16/2006/4, New York, United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voivodship Act. (1998). Warsaw: Parliment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the team of the District Office in Nowy Targ for their participation in this study. I am particularly grateful to the Project Manager of the Implementation Project in this institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Strojny .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Strojny, J. (2016). Project Orientation in Institutions of the Public Sector: Key Methodological Assumptions. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H. (eds) Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics - Vol. 2. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 3/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27573-4_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics