Advertisement

Pulpectomy and Root Canal Treatment (RCT) in Primary Teeth: Techniques and Materials

  • Moti MoskovitzEmail author
  • Nili Tickotsky
Chapter

Abstract

When confronted with an infected and/or necrotic pulp in primary teeth, dentists have two options: the first is to extract the tooth and provide a space maintainer (when needed) to preserve space for the erupting permanent successor, and the other option includes removal of pulp remnants and root canal obturation followed by crown reconstruction. The lack of treatment is not an option as it can cause damage to the succedaneous tooth (e.g., enamel hypo-mineralization or hypoplasia) [1] and negatively impact the child’s oral health-related quality of life (e.g., pain, eating preferences, quantity of food eaten, and sleep habits) [2].

Keywords

Root Canal Primary Tooth Primary Molar Root Canal Treatment Root Canal Filling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18(1):57–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Low W, Tan S, Schwartz S. The effect of severe caries on the quality of life in young children. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21(6):325–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: guideline on pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Revised 1998, 2001, 2004, 2009, 2014. Pediatr Dent. 242–50.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmed HMA. Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. Int Endod J. 2013;46(11):1011–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goerig AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary teeth: a review. Pediatr Dent. 1983;5(1):33–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cleghorn BM, Boorberg NB, Christie WH. Primary human teeth and their root canal systems. Endod Top. 2010;23(1):6–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zoremchhingi, Joseph T, Varma B, Mungara J. A study of root canal morphology of human primary molars using computerised tomography: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2005;23(1):7–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aminabadi NA, Farahani RMZ, Gajan EB. Study of root canal accessibility in human primary molars. J Oral Sci. 2008;50(1):69–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salama FS, Anderson RW, McKnight-Hanes C, Barenie JT, Myers DR. Anatomy of primary incisor and molar root canals. Pediatr Dent. 1992;14(2):117–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kramer PF, Faraco Júnior IM, Meira R. A SEM investigation of accessory foramina in the furcation areas of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003;27(2):157–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gordon MPJ, Chandler NP. Electronic apex locators. Int Endod J. 2004;37(7):425–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah GE, Coll JA. In vitro inhibition of bacteria from root canals of primary teeth by various dental materials. Pediatr Dent. 1995;17(5):351–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dummett Jr CO, Kopel H. Pediatric endodontics. In: Ingle J, editor. Endodontics. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 2002. p. 861–902.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fuks AB, Eidelman E, Pauker N. Root fillings with Endoflas in primary teeth: a retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2002;27(1):41–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Allen KR. Endodontic treatment of primary teeth. Aust Dent J. 1979;24(5):347–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coll JA, Josell S, Casper JS. Evaluation of a one-appointment formocresol pulpectomy technique for primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 1985;7(2):123–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mesbahi M, Talei S, Mollaverdi F, Kadkhodaza M. Comparison of root canal system configuration in primary teeth. Res J Biol Sci. 2010;5(7):488–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lugliè PF, Grabesu V, Spano G, Lumbau A. Accessory foramina in the furcation area of primary molars. A SEM investigation. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012;13(4):329–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fuks AB, Guelmann M, Kupietzky A. Current developments in pulp therapy for primary teeth. Endod Top. 2010;23(1):50–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Paiva SSM, Guimarães-Pinto T, Magalhães KM, Lima KC. Bacteriologic investigation of the effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine during the endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104(1):122–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ercan E, Ozekinci T, Atakul F, Gül K. Antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal: in vivo study. J Endod. 2004;30(2):84–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2006;32(5):389–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, Fayle SA, Moffat MA. Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16 Suppl 1:15–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mehdipour O, Kleier DJ, Averbach RE. Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007;28(10):544–6, 548, 550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goswami M, Chhabra N, Kumar G, Verma M, Chhabra A. Sodium hypochlorite dental accidents. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2014;34(1):66–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klein U, Kleier DJ. Sodium hypochlorite accident in a pediatric patient. Pediatr Dent. 2013;35(7):534–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhu W, Gyamfi J, Niu L, et al. Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents involving facial ecchymosis – a review. J Dent. 2013;41(11):935–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Sequeira-Byron P, de Souza RF, Carter B, Heft M. Irrigants for non-surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(9):CD008948.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fuks AB, Eidelman E. Pulp therapy in the primary dentition. Curr Opin Dent. 1991;1(5):556–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2004;14(6):417–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ozalp N, Saroğlu I, Sönmez H. Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: an in vivo study. Am J Dent. 2005;18(6):347–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Siqueira JF, Lopes HP. Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. Int Endod J. 1999;32(5):361–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barja-Fidalgo F, Moutinho-Ribeiro M, Oliveira MAA, de Oliveira BH. A systematic review of root canal filling materials for deciduous teeth: is there an alternative for zinc oxide-eugenol? ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:367318.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reddy S, Ramakrishna Y. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials used in primary teeth: a microbiological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007;31(3):193–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Subramaniam P, Gilhotra K. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars--a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(4):365–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah GE, Coll JA. Inhibition of pure cultures of oral bacteria by root canal filling materials. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18(7):444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kubota K, Golden BE, Penugonda B. Root canal filling materials for primary teeth: a review of the literature. ASDC J Dent Child. 1992;59(3):225–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen J-W, Jorden M. Materials for primary tooth pulp treatment: the present and the future. Endod Top. 2010;23(1):41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rifkin A. The root canal treatment of abscessed primary teeth--a three to four year follow-up. ASDC J Dent Child. 1982;49(6):428–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of an iodoform paste in root canal therapy for infected primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 1987;54(1):30–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rifkin A. A simple, effective, safe technique for the root canal treatment of abscessed primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 1980;47(6):435–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sadrian R, Coll JA. A long-term followup on the retention rate of zinc oxide eugenol filler after primary tooth pulpectomy. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15(4):249–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barker BC, Lockett BC. Endodontic experiments with resorbable paste. Aust Dent J. 1971;16(6):364–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Primosch RE, Glomb TA, Jerrell RG. Primary tooth pulp therapy as taught in predoctoral pediatric dental programs in the United States. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19(2):118–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dunston B, Coll JA. A survey of primary tooth pulp therapy as taught in US dental schools and practiced by diplomates of the American Board Of Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(1):42–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Barcelos R, Santos MPA, Primo LG, Luiz RR, Maia LC. ZOE paste pulpectomies outcome in primary teeth: a systematic review. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(3):241–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nurko C, Ranly DM, García-Godoy F, Lakshmyya KN. Resorption of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth: a case report. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(6):517–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hegde S, Lala PK, Dinesh RB, Shubha AB. An in vitro evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of primary root canal filling materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;37(1):59–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mass E, Zilberman UL. Endodontic treatment of infected primary teeth, using Maisto’s paste. ASDC J Dent Child. 1989;56(2):117–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Reddy VV, Fernandes. Clinical and radiological evaluation of zinc oxide-eugenol and Maisto’s paste as obturating materials in infected primary teeth--nine months study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1996;14(2):39–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Holan G, Fuks AB. A comparison of pulpectomies using ZOE and KRI paste in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15(6):403–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wright KJ, Barbosa SV, Araki K, Spångberg LS. In vitro antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of Kri 1 paste and zinc oxide-eugenol used in primary tooth pulpectomies. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16(2):102–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mente J, Seidel J, Buchalla W, Koch MJ. Electronic determination of root canal length in primary teeth with and without root resorption. Int Endod J. 2002;35(5):447–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kielbassa AM, Muller U, Munz I, Monting JS. Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;95(1):94–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Beltrame APCA, Triches TC, Sartori N, Bolan M. Electronic determination of root canal working length in primary molar teeth: an in vivo and ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2011;44(5):402–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Silva LAB, Leonardo MR, Nelson-Filho P, Tanomaru JMG. Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child (Chic). 2004;71(1):45–7.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Canoglu H, Tekcicek MU, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28(6):518–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(4):295–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pinheiro SL, Araujo G, Bincelli I, Cunha R, Bueno C. Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars. Int Endod J. 2012;45(4):379–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Seraj B, Ramezani G, Ghadimi S, Mosharrafian SH, Motahhary P, Safari M. In-vitro comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning capacity between endodontic handpiece and manual preparation techniques in primary molar teeth. Minerva Stomatol. 2013;62(1 – 2):17–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ochoa-Romero T, Mendez-Gonzalez V, Flores-Reyes H, Pozos-Guillen AJ. Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(4):359–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Miles JJ, Bulek AM, Cole DK, et al. Genetic and structural basis for selection of a ubiquitous T cell receptor deployed in Epstein-Barr virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(11):1–15.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(1):77–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Soares F, Varella CH, Pileggi R, Adewumi A, Guelmann M. Impact of Er, Cr:YSGG laser therapy on the cleanliness of the root canal walls of primary teeth. J Endod. 2008;34(4):474–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Katz A, Mass E, Kaufman AY. Electronic apex locator: a useful tool for root canal treatment in the primary dentition. ASDC J Dent Child. 1996;63(6):414–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Oznurhan F, Ünal M, Kapdan A, Ozturk C, Aksoy S. Clinical evaluation of apex locator and radiography in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015;25(3):199–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Topaloglu-Ak A, Aykut Yetkiner A, Güniz Baksi B, Eronat C. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(2):149–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ahmad IA, Pani SC. Accuracy of electronic apex locators in primary teeth: a meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2015;48(3):298–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Damle SG, Nadkarni UM. Calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary molars: a comparative study. Aust Endod J. 2005;31(3):114–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mani SA, Chawla HS, Tewari A, Goyal A. Evaluation of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 2000;67(2):142–7, 83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Trairatvorakul C, Chunlasikaiwan S. Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars: a clinical study. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(4):303–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Jokinen MA, Kotilainen R, Poikkeus P, Poikkeus R, Sarkki L. Clinical and radiographic study of pulpectomy and root canal therapy. Scand J Dent Res. 1978;86(5):366–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Flaitz CM, Barr ES, Hicks MJ. Radiographic evaluation of pulpal therapy for primary anterior teeth. ASDC J Dent Child. 1989;56(3):182–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Barr ES, Flatiz CM, Hicks MJ. A retrospective radiographic evaluation of primary molar pulpectomies. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13(1):4–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Yacobi R, Kenny DJ, Judd PL, Johnston DH. Evolving primary pulp therapy techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122(2):83–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Payne RG, Kenny DJ, Johnston DH, Judd PL. Two-year outcome study of zinc oxide-eugenol root canal treatment for vital primary teeth. J Can Dent Assoc. 1993;59(6):528–30, 533–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Primosch RE, Ahmadi A, Setzer B, Guelmann M. A retrospective assessment of zinc oxide-eugenol pulpectomies in vital maxillary primary incisors successfully restored with composite resin crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(6):470–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Moskovitz M, Sammara E, Holan G. Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars. J Dent. 2005;33(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Coll JA, Josell S, Nassof S, Shelton P, Richards MA. An evaluation of pulpal therapy in primary incisors. Pediatr Dent. 1988;10(3):178–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Reyes AD, Reina ES. Root canal treatment in necrotic primary molars. J Pedod. 1989;14(1):36–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Thomas AM, Chandra S, Pandey RK. Elimination of infection in pulpectomized deciduous teeth: a short-term study using iodoform paste. J Endod. 1994;20(5):233–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Smaïl-Faugeron V, Courson F, Durieux P, Muller-Bolla M, Glenny A-M, Fron Chabouis H. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD003220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Rewal N, Thakur AS, Sachdev V, Mahajan N. Comparison of endoflas and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary dentition. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(4):317–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Cope A, Francis N, Wood F, Mann MK, Chestnutt IG. Systemic antibiotics for symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;6:CD010136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nagle D, Reader A, Beck M, Weaver J. Effect of systemic penicillin on pain in untreated irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90(5):636–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Fouad AF, Rivera EM, Walton RE. Penicillin as a supplement in resolving the localized acute apical abscess. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;81(5):590–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Colgan R, Powers JH. Appropriate antimicrobial prescribing: approaches that limit antibiotic resistance. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64(6):999–1004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Moskovitz M, Tickotsky N, Ashkar H, Holan G. Degree of root resorption after root canal treatment with iodoform-containing filling material in primary molars. Quintessence Int. 2012;43(5):361–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Haralabakis NB, Yiagtzis SC, Toutountzakis NM. Premature or delayed exfoliation of deciduous teeth and root resorption and formation. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(2):151–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Jerrell RG, Ronk SL. Developmental arrest of a succedaneous tooth following pulpectomy in a primary tooth. J Pedod. 1982;6(4):337–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Tannure PN, Fidalgo TK, Barcelos R, Gleiser R, Primo LG. Ectopic eruption of permanent incisors after predecessor pulpectomy: five cases. Gen Dent. 2011;59(4):e162–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Moskovitz M, Yahav D, Tickotsky N, Holan G. Long-term follow up of root canal treated primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20(3):207–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Petel R, Moskovitz M, Tickotsky N, Halabi A, Goldstein J, Houri-Haddad Y. Cytotoxicity and proliferative effects of Iodoform-containing root canal-filling material on RAW 264.7 macrophage and RKO epithelial cell lines. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58:75–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Rimondini L, Baroni C. Morphologic criteria for root canal treatment of primary molars undergoing resorption. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1995;11(3):136–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Weiss EI, Shalhav M, Fuss Z. Assessment of antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by a direct contact test. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;12(4):179–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Nurko C, Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999;23(4):289–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Geetha Priya PR, John JB, Elango I. Turner’s hypoplasia and non-vitality: a case report of sequelae in permanent tooth. Contemp Clin Dent. 2010;1(4):251–4.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Ramar K, Mungara J. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials: an in-vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28(1):25–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatric DentistryHadassah Faculty of Dental Medicine, The Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.The Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Nanotechnology BuildingBar Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations