Advertisement

The Primary Pulp: Developmental and Biomedical Background

  • Anna B. FuksEmail author
  • Josimeri Hebling
  • Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa
Chapter

Abstract

Maintaining the integrity and health of the oral tissues is the primary objective of pulp treatment. Premature loss of primary teeth can lead to malocclusion and/or to esthetic, phonetic, or functional problems. It is important to attempt to preserve pulp vitality whenever possible; however, when this is not feasible, the pulp can be entirely extirpated without significantly compromising the function of the tooth [1, 2].

Keywords

Dental Pulp Dentinal Tubule Pulp Tissue Pulp Chamber Enamel Organ 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fuks AB. Pulp therapy in the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am. 2000;44:571–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: Pinkham JR, editor. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Massara MLA, Toledo OA. Terapia endodontica em deciduos. In: Toledo OA, editor. Odontopediatria, fundamentos para a pratica clinica. 3rd ed. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Editorial Premier; 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tziafas D. Dentinogenic potential of the dental pulp: facts and hypotheses. Endod Top. 2010;17:42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costa CAS, Figueiredo JAP, Hebling J, Estrela C. Pulp biology. In: Estrela C, editors. Endodontic science, vol 1. Artes Medicas, Sao Paulo, Brazil; 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D’Souza R. Development of the pulp–dentin complex. In: Hargreaves KM, Goodies HE, editors. Seltzer and Bender’s dental pulp. Chicago: Quintessence Int; 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith AJ. Dentin formation and repair. In: Hargreaves KM, Goodies HE, editors. Seltzer and Bender’s dental pulp. Chicago: Quintessence Int; 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Scheffel DL, Soares DG, Basso FG, Ribeiro AP. Methods to evaluate and strategies to improve the biocompatibility of dental materials and operative techniques. Dent Mater. 2014;30(7):769–84. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sardella TN, de Castro FL, Sanabe ME, Hebling J. Shortening of primary dentin etching time and its implication on bond strength. J Dent. 2005;33(5):355–62. Epub 2004 Dec 13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scheffel DL, Tenuta LM, Cury JA, Hebling J. Effect of acid etching time on demineralization of primary and permanent coronal dentin. Am J Dent. 2012;25(4):235–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Di Nicolo R, Guedes-Pinto AC, Carvalho YR. Histopathology of the pulp of primary molars with active and arrested dentinal caries. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000;25:47–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klinge RF. Further observations on tertiary dentin in human deciduous teeth. Adv Dent Res. 2001;15:76–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effect of surgical exposures of dental pulp in germ free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965;20:340–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E, Bergenholtz G. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murray PE, About I, Tranquil JC, Recusant M, Smith AJ. Restorative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001;132:482–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    About I, Murray PE, Franquin JC, Remusat MAJ. Pulpal inflammatory responses following non carious class V restorations. Oper Dent. 2001;26:336–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Qvist V. Correlation between marginal adaption of composite resin restorations and bacterial growth in cavities. Scand J Dent Res. 1980;88:296–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Qvist V, Staltze K, Qvist J. Human pulp reactions to resin restorations performed with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scand. 1989;47:253–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Costa CAS, Giro EM, do Nascimento AB, Teixeira HM, Hebling J. Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities. Dent Mater. 2003;19(8):739–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Souza Costa CA, Teixeira HM, Lopes do Nascimento AB, Hebling J. Biocompatibility of resin-based dental materials applied as liners in deep cavities prepared in human teeth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;81(1):175–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Modena KC, Casas-Apayco LC, Atta MT, Costa CAS, Hebling J, Sipert CR, Navarro MF, Santos CF. Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of direct and indirect pulp capping materials. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(6):544–54.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Costa CAS, Ribeiro AP, Giro EM, Randall RC, Hebling J. Pulp response after application of two resin modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) in deep cavities of prepared human teeth. Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):e158–70. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    About I, Murray PE, Franquin JC, Remusat M, Smith AJ. The effect of cavity restoration variables on odontoblast cell numbers and dental repair. J Dent. 2001;29:109–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Camps J, Dejou J, Remusat M, About I. Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations. Dent Mater. 2000;16:432–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Randall RC. Human pulp response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations. Dent Mater. 2006;22(10):954–62. Epub 2006 Jan 4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sloan AJ, Smith AJ. Stimulation of the dentine–pulp complex of rat incisor teeth by transforming growth factor-beta isoforms 1–3 in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 1999;44:149–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goldberg M, Smith AJ. Cells and extracellular matrices of dentin and pulp: a biological basis for repair and tissue engineering. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15:13–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tecles O, Laurent P, Zygouritsas S, Burger AS, Camps J, Dejou J, About I. Activation of human dental pulp progenitor/stem cells in response to odontoblast injury. Arch Oral Biol. 2005;50:103–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Franquin JC, Remusat M, Smith AJ. Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity. Am J Dent. 2002;15:41–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Duque C, Negrini TC, Sacono NT, Spolidorio DM, de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J. Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass-ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13(4):465–71. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0304-2. Epub 2009 Jun 23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ruch JV, Lesot H, Begue-Kim C. Odontoblast differentiation. Inter J Develop Biol. 1995;39: 51–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna B. Fuks
    • 1
    Email author
  • Josimeri Hebling
    • 2
  • Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric DentistryThe Hebrew University Hadassah School of Dental MedicineJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric DentistryUniversity Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Araraquara School of DentistryAraraquaraBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Physiology and PathologyUniversity Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Araraquara School of DentistryAraraquaraBrazil

Personalised recommendations