Skip to main content

MCDA and LCSA—A Note on the Aggregation of Preferences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 416))

  • 1068 Accesses

Abstract

Cost and social dimensions are now being added to the existing environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), leading to Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA). LCSA is very complex with deep uncertainties and, generally, involves several stakeholders. Therefore, the analysis and interpretation of the outputs of LCSA is a difficult and complex task, requiring aggregation of preferences. The work in progress here presented deals with a study regarding the use of open exchange interactive software packages dedicated to Multi-criteria decision aiding in the context of LCSA output analysis and interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sen, A: Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Our Common Future–Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: United Nations (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zamagni, A., Pesonen, H.L., Swarr, T.: From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int. Life cycle Assess. 18, 1637–1641 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., Bras, B.: A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment–part 2: impact assessment and interpretation. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13, 374–388 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazri, C., Ventura, A., Jullien, A., Bouyssou, D.: Life cycle analysis and decision aiding: an example of roads evaluation. http://sciencestage.com/d/1093635/life-cycle-analysis-and-decision-ainding-an-example-for-roads-evaluations-.html

  6. Mietinen, P., Hamailainen, R.P.: How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). EJOR 102, 279–294 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benoit, V., Pousseaux, P.: Aid for aggregating the impacts in life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8, 74–82 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huppes, G., von Oers, L., Pretato, U., Pennington, D.: Weighting environmental effects: analytic survey with operational evaluation methods and a meta-method. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 17, 876–891 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cinelli, M., Coles, S., Kirwan, K.: Use of multicriteria decision analysis to support life cycle sustainability assessment: an analysis of the appropriateness of the available methods. In: 6th International Conference on Life Cycle, Gothenburg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halog, A., Manik, Y.: Advancing integrated systems modeling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3, 469–499 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benetto, E., Dujet, C.: Uncertainty analysis and MCDA; A case study in life cycle assessment (LCA) practice. In: Proceedings of the 57th Meeting of the European Working Group on Multicriteria Decision Aiding. Viterbo (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dias, L., Clímaco, J.: Additive aggregation with interdependent parameters: the VIP analysis software. JORS 51, 1070–1082 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clímaco, J., Fernandes, S., Captivo, M.E.: Classificação MultiAtributo Suportada por uma Versão Interactiva do Método Conjuntivo (An Interactive version of the Conjunctive Method dedicated to Multiattribute Classification Problems). CIO—Working Paper 9 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clímaco, J., Craveirinha, J.: Multi-actor multidimensional quality of life and sustainable impact assessment—discussion based on a new interactive tool. In: Proceedings of GDN 2013, Sweden (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Valle, R., Clímaco, J.: Green economy in the state of rio de janeiro—a non-compensatory multidimensional interactive evaluation. In: XXII MCDM Conference, Malaga (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Figueira, J., Mousseau, V.,Roy, B.: ELECTRE Methods, Multiple Criteria decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. In: Figueira, J., Erghot, M., Greco, S., Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Duarte, S.: Social impacts identification and characterization tool (SIICT): proposal and application for social LCA. SAGE/COPPE/UFRJ Internal Report (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Paris (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Carlos Namorado Clímaco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Clímaco, J.C.N., Valle, R. (2016). MCDA and LCSA—A Note on the Aggregation of Preferences. In: Kunifuji, S., Papadopoulos, G., Skulimowski, A., Kacprzyk  , J. (eds) Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 416. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27478-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27478-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27477-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27478-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics