Advertisement

Synthetic Mesh: Making Educated Choices

  • Issa Mirmehdi
  • Bruce RamshawEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The choice of mesh for hernia repair is a very complex issue. There are hundreds of options of mesh clinically available. Since hernia mesh has grown to become an approximately $1 Billion market, there are too many choices to know what would be best for which patient and what technique. Mesh is currently used based on surgeon preference less and less and based on hospital contracting more and more. However, mostly missing in the choice of mesh is the patient preference and the actual value provided to various patient groups and techniques. Measuring the value of the care provided and the value of devices and drugs used during the care process will be a necessary component of the shift from volume to value for health care in the twenty-first century. This chapter will present synthetic mesh options available for hernia repair and some perspectives about how to choose between these options.

Keywords

Hernia mesh Polypropylene Polyester PTFE Clinical quality improvement (CQI) Absorbable synthetic mesh Shared-decision process Complexity Complex systems science Nonlinear dynamics 

References

  1. 1.
    Usher FC, Ochsner J, Tuttle Jr LLD. Use of Marlex mesh in the repair of incisional hernias. Am Surg. 1958;24:969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989;157:188–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, et al. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; CD002197.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2002;235:322–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg. 2000;87:854–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown CN, Finch JG. Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:272–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klinge U, Binnebosel M, Mertens PR. Are collagens the culprits in the development of incisional and inguinal hernia disease? Hernia. 2006;10(6):472–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fabian TC, Croce MA, Pritchard FE, et al. Planned ventral hernia. Stagedmanagement for acute abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg. 1994;219:643–50. discussion 651–653.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jernigan TW, Fabian TC, Croce MA, et al. Staged management of giant abdominal wall defect: acute and long-term results. Ann Surg. 2003;238:349–55. discussion 355-357.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Ann Surg. 2013;257(6):991–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee L, Mata J, Landry T, Khwaja KA, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM, Feldman LS. A systematic review of synthetic and biologic materials for abdominal wall reinforcement in contaminated fields. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2531–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raptis DA, Vichova B, Breza J, Skipworth J, Barker S. A comparison of woven versus nonwoven polypropylene (PP) and expanded versus condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on their intraperitoneal incorporation and adhesion formation. J Surg Res. 2011;169(1):1–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE, editors. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lowe NS, W.L. Medical device reporting for user facilities. Center for devices and radiological health. 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Siegel E. Predictive analytics: the power to predict who will click, buy, lie, or die. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.General SurgeryHalifax HealthDaytona BeachUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryThe University of Tennessee Knoxville Graduate School of MedicineKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations