Advertisement

Wound Closure and Postoperative Hernia Prevention Strategies

  • An Jairam
  • Gabrielle H. van RamshorstEmail author
  • Johan F. Lange
Chapter

Abstract

Closure of the laparotomy wound is the first and most important time point for prevention of postoperative hernia. Abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia are major complications, associated with high morbidity and even mortality. Various risk models have been developed for both conditions, consisting of both patient and surgery-related risk factors. Surgical risk factors that can be influenced by surgeons include type of incision, type of suture material, and type of suture technique. In order to prevent incisional hernia in the midline incision, it is advocated to suture the abdominal wall continuously in a mass closure technique. Slowly absorbable sutures should be used with a suture length to wound length ratio of at least 4:1 using small stitches (5–8 mm) with small inter suture distances (5 mm). Currently, there is not enough evidence to support the use of retention sutures or abdominal binders to prevent incisional hernia. In high-risk patients, e.g., with obesity or abdominal aortic aneurysms, it should be considered to use prophylactic mesh (in onlay or sublay position). Prophylactic mesh in onlay position has been associated with increased incidence of seroma formation.

Keywords

Incisional hernia Ventral hernia Surgical wound Complication Closure Abdominal wound Dehiscence Burst abdomen Prevention Surgical technique Suture length to wound length ratio Bite Small stitch Large stitch 

References

  1. 1.
    Timmermans L, Eker HH, Steyerberg EW, Jairam A, de Jong D, Pierik EG, et al. Short-term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture with primary glued mesh augmentation to prevent incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2014;261(2):276–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strzelczyk JM, Szymanski D, Nowicki ME, Wilczynski W, Gaszynski T, Czupryniak L. Randomized clinical trial of postoperative hernia prophylaxis in open bariatric surgery. Br J Surg. 2006;93(11):1347–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burger JW, van’t Riet M, Jeekel J. Abdominal incisions: techniques and postoperative complications. Scand J Surg. 2002;91(4):315–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dubay DA, Franz MG. Acute wound healing: the biology of acute wound failure. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83(3):463–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van’t Riet M, De Vos Van Steenwijk PJ, Bonjer HJ, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J. Incisional hernia after repair of wound dehiscence: incidence and risk factors. Am Surg. 2004;70(4):281–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlson MA. Acute wound failure. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(3):607–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gislason H, Gronbech JE, Soreide O. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations—comparison of three closure techniques. Eur J Surg. 1995;161(5):349–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gislason H, Viste A. Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointestinal operations—comparison of different surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia. Eur J Surg. 1999;165(10):958–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bevis PM, Windhaber RA, Lear PA, Poskitt KR, Earnshaw JJ, Mitchell DC. Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg. 2010;97(10):1497–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hidalgo MP, Ferrero EH, Ortiz MA, Castillo JM, Hidalgo AG. Incisional hernia in patients at risk: can it be prevented? Hernia. 2011;15(4):371–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Khadrawy OH, Moussa G, Mansour O, Hashish MS. Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients. Hernia. 2009;13(3):267–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caro-Tarrago A, Olona Casas C, Jimenez Salido A, Duque Guilera E, Moreno Fernandez F, Vicente GV. Prevention of incisional hernia in midline laparotomy with an onlay mesh: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2014;38(9):2223–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Llaguna OH, Avgerinos DV, Nagda P, Elfant D, Leitman IM, Goodman E. Does prophylactic biologic mesh placement protect against the development of incisional hernia in high-risk patients? World J Surg. 2011;35(7):1651–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Veljkovic R, Protic M, Gluhovic A, Potic Z, Milosevic Z, Stojadinov A. Prospective clinical trial of factors predicting the early development of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(2):210–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown SR, Goodfellow PB. Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD005199.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Halm JA, Lip H, Schmitz PI, Jeekel J. Incisional hernia after upper abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial of midline versus transverse incision. Hernia. 2009;13(3):275–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seiler CM, Deckert A, Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Weigand MA, Victor N, et al. Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227). Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):913–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fassiadis N, Roidl M, Hennig M, South LM, Andrews SM. Randomized clinical trial of vertical or transverse laparotomy for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2005;92(10):1208–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J. Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg. 2001;167(4):260–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Proske JM, Zieren J, Muller JM. Transverse versus midline incision for upper abdominal surgery. Surg Today. 2005;35(2):117–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Armstrong CP, Dixon JM, Duffy SW, Elton RA, Davies GC. Wound healing in obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg. 1984;71(4):267–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stone HH, Hoefling SJ, Strom PR, Dunlop WE, Fabian TC. Abdominal incisions: transverse vs vertical placement and continuous vs interrupted closure. South Med J. 1983;76(9):1106–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greenall MJ, Evans M, Pollock AV. Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part I: influence on healing. Br J Surg. 1980;67(3):188–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson Jr H. Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg. 1992;163(3):324–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002;89(11):1350–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Niggebrugge AH, Trimbos JB, Hermans J, Steup WH, Van De Velde CJ. Influence of abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomised study. Lancet. 1999;353(9164):1563–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S. Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 1998;176(6):666–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berretta R, Rolla M, Patrelli TS, Piantelli G, Merisio C, Melpignano M, et al. Randomised prospective study of abdominal wall closure in patients with gynaecological cancer. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(4):391–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJ, Jeekel J. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1987;74(8):738–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gupta H, Srivastava A, Menon GR, Agrawal CS, Chumber S, Kumar S. Comparison of interrupted versus continuous closure in abdominal wound repair: a meta-analysis of 23 trials. Asian J Surg. 2008;31(3):104–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, et al. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg. 2009;249(4):576–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):843–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hoer J, Stumpf M, Rosch R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Prevention of incisional hernia. Chirurg. 2002;73(9):881–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1056–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg. 1993;80(10):1284–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    van Ramshorst GH, Klop B, Hop WC, Israelsson LA, Lange JF. Closure of midline laparotomies by means of small stitches: practical aspects of a new technique. Surg Technol Int. 2013;23:34–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cengiz Y, Blomquist P, Israelsson LA. Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study. Arch Surg. 2001;136(3):272–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, Van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, Wijnhoven BP, Schouten WR, Cense HA, Stockmann HB, Berends FJ, Dijkhuizen FP, Dwarkasing RS, Jairam AP, van Ramshorst GH, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1254–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Millbourn D, Wimo A, Israelsson LA. Cost analysis of the use of small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions. Hernia. 2013;18(6):775–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. 2015;19(1):1–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bouvier A, Rat P, Drissi-Chbihi F, Bonnetain F, Lacaine F, Mariette C, et al. Abdominal binders after laparotomy: review of the literature and French survey of policies. Hernia. 2014;18(4):501–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    van Ramshorst GH, Eker HH, van der Voet JA, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Long-term outcome study in patients with abdominal wound dehiscence: a comparative study on quality of life, body image, and incisional hernia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(8):1477–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Christoffersen MW, Olsen BH, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Randomized Clinical Trial on the postoperative use of an abdominal binder after laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Hernia. 2014;19(1):147–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nachiappan S, Markar S, Karthikesalingam A, Ziprin P, Faiz O. Prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients undergoing elective laparotomy: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2013;37(8):1861–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Strzelczyk J, Czupryniak L. Polypropylene mesh in prevention of postoperative hernia in bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2005;241(1):196. author reply-7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bhangu A, Fitzgerald JE, Singh P, Battersby N, Marriott P, Pinkney T. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Hernia. 2013;17(4):445–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Timmermans L, de Goede B, Eker HH, van Kempen BJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Meta-analysis of primary mesh augmentation as prophylactic measure to prevent incisional hernia. Dig Surg. 2013;30(4–6):401–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Paye F, Rongere C, Gendreau D, Lenriot JP. Intraperitoneal resorbable mesh in the prevention of postoperative wound dehiscence. A comparative study. Ann Chir. 1992;46(6):518–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gainant A, Boudinet F, Cubertafond P. Prevention of postoperative wound dehiscence in high risk patients. A randomized comparison of internally applied resorbable polyglactin 910 mesh and externally applied polyamide fiber mesh. Int Surg. 1989;74(1):55–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tohme C, Brechet E, Bernard A, Arnaud R, Viard H. Prevention of postoperative wound dehiscence. Comparative study of polyglactin 910 mesh and total reinforced extraperitoneal sutures. Ann Chir. 1991;45(6):513–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Webster C, Neumayer L, Smout R, Horn S, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. Prognostic models of abdominal wound dehiscence after laparotomy. J Surg Res. 2003;109(2):130–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gomez Diaz CJ, Rebasa Cladera P, Navarro Soto S, Hidalgo Rosas JM, Luna Aufroy A, Montmany Vioque S, et al. Validation of abdominal wound dehiscence’s risk model. Cir Esp. 2014;92(2):114–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC, Arends P, Boom J, Jeekel J, et al. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010;34(1):20–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kenig J, Richter P, Lasek A, Zbierska K, Zurawska S. The efficacy of risk scores for predicting abdominal wound dehiscence: a case-controlled validation study. BMC Surg. 2014;14:65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R, Mertens PR, Kirch J, Klosterhalfen B, et al. Decreased collagen type I/III ratio in patients with recurring hernia after implantation of alloplastic prostheses. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Klinge U, Si ZY, Zheng H, Schumpelick V, Bhardwaj RS, Klosterhalfen B. Abnormal collagen I to III distribution in the skin of patients with incisional hernia. Eur Surg Res. 2000;32(1):43–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Peeters E, De Hertogh G, Junge K, Klinge U, Miserez M. Skin as marker for collagen type I/III ratio in abdominal wall fascia. Hernia. 2014;18(4):519–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rosch R, Junge K, Knops M, Lynen P, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Analysis of collagen-interacting proteins in patients with incisional hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003;387(11–12):427–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    van Ramshorst GH, Eker HH, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg. 2012;204(2):144–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T. Outcomes after emergency versus elective ventral hernia repair: a prospective nationwide study. World J Surg. 2013;37(10):2273–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Martinez-Serrano MA, Pereira JA, Sancho JJ, Lopez-Cano M, Bombuy E, Hidalgo J, et al. Risk of death after emergency repair of abdominal wall hernias. Still waiting for improvement. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395(5):551–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Halasz NA. Dehiscence of laparotomy wounds. Am J Surg. 1968;116(2):210–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Keill RH, Keitzer WF, Nichols WK, Henzel J, DeWeese MS. Abdominal wound dehiscence. Arch Surg. 1973;106(4):573–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Waldhausen JH, Davies L. Pediatric postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence: transverse versus vertical incisions. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(6):688–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Campbell DP, Swenson O. Wound dehiscence in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg. 1972;7(2):123–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    van Ramshorst GH, Salu NE, Bax NM, Hop WC, van Heurn E, Aronson DC, et al. Risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence in children: a case-control study. World J Surg. 2009;33(7):1509–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Albertsmeier M, Seiler CM, Fischer L, Baumann P, Husing J, Seidlmayer C, et al. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MonoMax(R) suture material for abdominal wall closure after primary midline laparotomy-a controlled prospective multicentre trial: ISSAAC [NCT005725079]. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(3):363–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Penninckx FM, Poelmans SV, Kerremans RP, Beckers JP. Abdominal wound dehiscence in gastroenterological surgery. Ann Surg. 1979;189(3):345–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Laghaie B, Aminian A, Hosseini Araghi N, Soroush A. Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high-risk patients for wound dehiscence: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res. 2013;180(2):238–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Israelsson LA, Millbourn D. Closing midline abdominal incisions. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(8):1201–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • An Jairam
    • 1
  • Gabrielle H. van Ramshorst
    • 2
    Email author
  • Johan F. Lange
    • 1
  1. 1.Erasmus University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.VU Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations