Advertisement

Hernia Surgery pp 473-479 | Cite as

Inguinal Hernias: an Algorithmic Approach to Procedure Selection

  • Brian P. JacobEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Employing a minimally invasive or open inguinal hernia repair for a primary inguinal hernia remains debatable. It has been clearly established that in experienced hands, both the open and minimally invasive (MIS) techniques can produce excellent short- and long-term results while understanding that all inguinal hernia operations carry a small risk of chronic pain and recurrences. With a large variety of open repairs including tissue-only repairs, plug and patch techniques, or Lichtenstein repairs, and with a variety of minimally invasive approaches including both laparoscopic and robotic total extraperitoneal (TEP) or transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repairs, hernia repair options are really numerous and tough to compare and contrast. Weighing the benefits of open versus MIS repair for any new patient presenting with a primary inguinal hernia will remain an academic pursuit, but practical focus needs to shift to establishing the best technique to utilize at different times, depending on the patient, with the goal being outcome optimization. Treatment algorithms for the many different types of patients presenting with inguinal hernias can help guide surgeons toward this objective.

Keywords

TEP TAPP Open robotic inguinal hernia Outcomes groin Laparoscopic pain 

References

  1. 1.
    Fitzgibbons RJ, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, Dunlop DD, Reda DJ, McCarthy Jr M, Neumayer LA, Barkun JS, Hoehn JL, Murphy JT, Sarosi Jr GA, Syme WC, Thompson JS, Wang J, Jonasson O. Watchful waiting vs. repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;295(3):285–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Klima DA, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Heniford TB. Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):709–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scott NW, McCormack K, Graham P, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant AM. Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;4:CD002197.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Langeveld HR, van’t Riet M, Weidema WF, Stassen LP, Steyerberg EW, Lange J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):819–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO, Hurley M. Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality of life outcomes. World J Surg. 2010;34(12):3059–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eklund A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C. Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Swedish Multicentre Trial of Inguinal Hernia Repair by Laparoscopy (SMIL) study group. Br J Surg. 2010;97(4):600–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons Jr R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(18):1819–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wake BL, McCormack K, Fraser C, Vale L, Perez J, Grant AM. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;25(1):cd004703.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sevonius D, Gunnarsson U, Nordin P, Nilsson E, Sandblom G. Recurrent groin hernia surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(10):1489–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bringman S, Blomqvist P. Intestinal obstruction after inguinal and femoral hernia repair: a study of 33,275 operations during 1992–2000 in Sweden. Hernia. 2005;9(2):178–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations