Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Detecting Opinions in a Temporally Evolving Conversation on Twitter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9471))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The immense growth of online social networks from simply being a medium of connecting people to assuming a variety of roles has led to a massive increase in their use and popularity. Today, networks like Facebook and Twitter act as news sources, mediums of advertising and facilitators of socio-political revolutions. In such a scenario, it is of vital importance to be able to detect the opinions of social network users in order to study the opinion flow processes that unfold in these networks. For many topics, the focus of the conversation evolves over time based on the occurrence of real-world events, which makes opinion detection challenging. Since it is not practical to label samples from every point in time, a general supervised learning approach is infeasible. In this work we propose a temporal machine-learning model that has its underpinnings in social network research conducted by sociologists over the years, to detect user opinions in evolving conversations. It uses a combination of hashtags and n-grams as features to identify the opinions of Twitter users on a topic, from their publicly available tweets. We use it to detect temporal opinions on Obamacare and U.S. Immigration Reform, for which it is able to identify user opinions with a very high degree of accuracy for a randomly chosen set of users over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Obamacare facts. http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-facts/

  2. p-value. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value

  3. Twitter usage statistics. http://www.internetlivestats.com/twitter-statistics/

  4. U.S. immigration reform. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Security,_Economic_Opportunity,_and_Immigration_Modernization_Act_of_2013

  5. Revolutionizing revolutions: Virtual collective consciousness and the arab spring (2012). http://www.huffingtonpost.com/yousri-marzouki/revolutionizing-revolutio_b_1679181.html

  6. Obamacare sees social media surge ahead of deadline, March 2014. http://www.nextgov.com/health/2014/03/obamacare-sees-social-media-surge-ahead-deadline/81625/

  7. Social networks and social media in ukrainian “euromaidan” protests (2014). http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/01/02/social-networks-and-social-media-in-ukrainian-euromaidan-protests-2/

  8. The top 20 valuable facebook statistics (2015). https://zephoria.com/social-media/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/ (updated February 2015)

  9. Akkaya, C., Wiebe, J., Mihalcea, R.: Subjectivity word sense disambiguation. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, vol. 1, pp. 190–199. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Sentiwordnet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC, vol. 10, pp. 2200–2204 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bespalov, D., Bai, B., Qi, Y., Shokoufandeh, A.: Sentiment classification based on supervised latent n-gram analysis. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 375–382. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bhattacharjee, K., Petzold, L.: Probabilistic user-level opinion detection on online social networks. In: Aiello, L.M., McFarland, D. (eds.) SocInfo 2014. LNCS, vol. 8851, pp. 309–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bono, J.E., Ilies, R.: Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion. The Leadership Quarterly 17(4), 317–334 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D.M.: Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 519–528. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davidov, D., Tsur, O., Rappoport, A.: Enhanced sentiment learning using twitter hashtags and smileys. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeGroot, M.H.: Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69(345), 118–121 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Sentiwordnet: a publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. Proceedings of LREC 6, 417–422 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fawcett, T.: An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 27(8), 861–874 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedkin, N.E., Johnsen, E.C.: Social influence networks and opinion change. Advances in Group Processes 16(1), 1–29 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garas, A., Garcia, D., Skowron, M., Schweitzer, F.: Emotional persistence in online chatting communities. Scientific Reports 2 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K.: Predicting tie strength with social media. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, L.: Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. CS224N Project Report, Stanford, 1–12 (2009a)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kucuktunc, O., Cambazoglu, B.B., Weber, I., Ferhatosmanoglu, H.: A large-scale sentiment analysis for Yahoo! answers. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. LIWC: LIWC software (2001). http://www.liwc.net/index.php

  25. MPQA: MPQA (2005). http://mpqa.cs.pitt.edu/lexicons/

  26. Ng, A.Y.: Feature election, L 1 vs. L 2 regularization, and rotational invariance. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Pendse, S.V., Tetteh, I.K., Semazzi, F.H., Kumar, V., Samatova, N.F.: Toward data-driven, semi-automatic inference of phenomenological physical models: application to eastern sahel rainfall. In: SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pennebaker, J.W., Chung, C.K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., Booth, R.J.: The development and psychometric properties of LIWC 2007. Austin, TX, LIWC. Net (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., Booth, R.J.: Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tan, C., Lee, L., Tang, J., Jiang, L., Zhou, M., Li, P.: User-level sentiment analysis incorporating social networks. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1397–1405. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tan, S., Li, Y., Sun, H., Guan, Z., Yan, X., Bu, J., Chen, C., He, X.: Interpreting the public sentiment variations on twitter. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 26(5), 1158–1170 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(2), 406–418 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(12), 2544–2558 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, X., Wei, F., Liu, X., Zhou, M., Zhang, M.: Topic sentiment analysis in twitter: a graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., Cardie, C.: Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation 39(2–3), 165–210 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilson, T.: Fine-grained subjectivity analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

    Kasturi Bhattacharjee & Linda Petzold

Authors
  1. Kasturi Bhattacharjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda Petzold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasturi Bhattacharjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Microsoft Research Asia, Beijing, China

    Tie-Yan Liu

  2. Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore

    Christie Napa Scollon

  3. Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Wenwu Zhu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bhattacharjee, K., Petzold, L. (2015). Detecting Opinions in a Temporally Evolving Conversation on Twitter. In: Liu, TY., Scollon, C., Zhu, W. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9471. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27433-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27433-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27432-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27433-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation