Skip to main content

Immediate or Delayed Repair for Bile Duct Injury Recognized Postoperatively?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Difficult Decisions in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery

Part of the book series: Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach ((DDSURGERY))

  • 1136 Accesses

Abstract

Bile duct injuries occurring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are rare, but result in considerable morbidity, rare mortality and major health care costs. Significant debate and controversy, however, remains regarding the optimal timing of repair of bile duct injury recognized in the postoperative period. Delayed bile duct injury repair has been associated with superior clinical outcomes when compared to immediate repair. Repair via a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy approach has been shown to have higher success rates when compared to direct repair of these injuries. Repair of bile duct injuries is feasible with no long-term physical quality of life impairments, but with deterioration in mental health that improves over time after repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, et al. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA. 2003;289(13):1639–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P, et al. Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet. 1998;351(9099):321–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steiner CA, Bass EB, Talamini MA, et al. Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(6):403–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pitt HA, Sherman S, Johnson MS, et al. Improved outcomes of bile duct injuries in the 21st century. Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):490–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walsh RM, Henderson JM, Vogt DP, et al. Long-term outcome of biliary reconstruction for bile duct injuries from laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery. 2007;142(4):450–6; discussion 456–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg. 2005;140(10):986–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwaitzberg SD, Scott DJ, Jones DB, et al. Threefold increased bile duct injury rate is associated with less surgeon experience in an insurance claims database: more rigorous training in biliary surgery may be needed. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3068–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Savader SJ, Lillemoe KD, Prescott CA, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster. Ann Surg. 1997;225(3):268–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF, et al. Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg. 1993;218(2):129–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Cameron JL, et al. Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg. 2000;232(3):430–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chuang KI, Corley D, Postlethwaite DA, et al. Does increased experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy yield more complex bile duct injuries? Am J Surg. 2012;203(4):480–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Slater K, Strong RW, Wall DR, et al. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: the scourge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72(2):83–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen G, Wang H, Chen L, et al. Living donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft from a donor with severe liver trauma: a 7-year follow-up. Liver Transpl. 2009;15(10):1370–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Landman MP, Feurer ID, Moore DE, et al. The long-term effect of bile duct injuries on health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis. HPB (Oxf). 2013;15(4):252–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Melton GB, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, et al. Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life. Ann Surg. 2002;235(6):888–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, et al. Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis. Ann Surg. 2001;234(6):750–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Walsh RM, Vogt DP, Ponsky JL, et al. Management of failed biliary repairs for major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(2):192–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mercado MA, Franssen B, Dominguez I, et al. Transition from a low: to a high-volume centre for bile duct repair: changes in technique and improved outcome. HPB (Oxf). 2011;13(11):767–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, et al. Advantages of multidisciplinary management of bile duct injuries occurring during cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2008;195(6):763–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lillemoe KD, Martin SA, Cameron JL, et al. Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management. Ann Surg. 1997;225(5):459–68; discussion 468–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson SR, Koehler A, Pennington LK, et al. Long-term results of surgical repair of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2000;128(4):668–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iannelli A, Paineau J, Hamy A, et al. Primary versus delayed repair for bile duct injuries sustained during cholecystectomy: results of a survey of the Association Francaise de Chirurgie. HPB (Oxf). 2013;15(8):611–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sahajpal AK, Chow SC, Dixon E, et al. Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing of repair and long-term outcomes. Arch Surg. 2010;145(8):757–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sicklick JK, Camp MS, Lillemoe KD, et al. Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients. Ann Surg. 2005;241(5):786–92; discussion 793–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomson BN, Parks RW, Madhavan KK, et al. Early specialist repair of biliary injury. Br J Surg. 2006;93(2):216–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stewart L, Way LW. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg. 1995;130(10):1123–8; discussion 1129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life after iatrogenic bile duct injury repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:923–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bass EB, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1993;165(4):466–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Andersson R, Eriksson K, Blind PJ, et al. Iatrogenic bile duct injury – a cost analysis. HPB (Oxf). 2008;10(6):416–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. de Reuver PR, Sprangers MA, Rauws EA, et al. Impact of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy on quality of life: a longitudinal study after multidisciplinary treatment. Endoscopy. 2008;40(8):637–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kern KA. Malpractice litigation involving laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cost, cause, and consequences. Arch Surg. 1997;132(4):392–7; discussion 397–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith D. Lillemoe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fong, Z.V., Lillemoe, K.D. (2016). Immediate or Delayed Repair for Bile Duct Injury Recognized Postoperatively?. In: Millis, J., Matthews, J. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27365-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27365-5_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27363-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27365-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics