Abstract
Feeding behaviour is an important aspect of animal production, as it constitutes the link between the feed provided and that which is consumed. Measures of feeding behaviour can be used as a tool with which to gauge how an animal perceives the diet offered, as well as its motivation to feed, i.e. its level of hunger. The feed intake of an animal may also depend on the presentation of the food, the previous experience of the animal with a given food, and to what extent other competing motivations affect the behaviour of the animal. In this chapter, examples from ruminants, pigs, and poultry are provided on how measures of feeding behaviour can be used to elucidate the constraints on feeding imposed by the nutritional, physical, and social environment of our production animals. For ruminants, the relationship between meal patterns and rumen fermentation is described, together with the effects of feed delivery and feeding frequency on the feeding behaviour, in particular the sorting of feed components. Further examples are provided on how competition at the feed trough results in higher feeding rates and can lead to uneven distribution of the feed between animals in a group, dependent on space availability, trough design, and partitioning. We describe how the provision of fibre may alleviate hunger and aggression in parent stock, such as gestating sows and broiler breeders that are restrictively fed. Examples are provided of how automatic feeders can be used to detect changes in the feeding patterns of individual animals, which in turn can be used in the detection of health problems. It is described how grazing ruminants show behavioural adaptability not only to changes in sward composition and height but also to hot and cold environments. Other examples include studies of feeding behaviour that have explored ways to reduce the stress experienced by piglets in connection with weaning, and how feather pecking in laying hens may be prevented by provision of roughage. Overall, the understanding of species-specific feeding behaviour and nutritional requirements is important for the assessment of animal welfare. It may help solve many feeding problems and allow animals to maximize the potential of the nutritional value of the feed provided to them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aerni V, El-Lethey H, Wechsler B (2000) Effect of foraging material and food form on feather pecking in laying hens. Br Poult Sci 41(1):16–21
Ahmed AF, Constable PD, Misk NA (2002) Effect of feeding frequency and route of administration on abomasal luminal pH in dairy calves fed milk replacer. J Dairy Sci 85(6):1502–1508
Aigueperse N, Calandreau L, Bertin A (2013) Maternal diet influences offspring feeding behavior and fearfulness in the precocial chicken. PLoS One 8(10):e77583
Aikman PC, Reynolds CK, Beever DE (2008) Diet digestibility, rate of passage, and eating and rumination behavior of Jersey and Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 91(3):1103–1114
Allen MS (1997) Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. J Dairy Sci 80(7):1447–1462
Appleby MC, Weary DM, Chua B (2001) Performance and feeding behaviour of calves on ad libitum milk from artificial teats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 74(3):191–201
Arnould U, Faure JM (2003) Use of pen space and activity of broiler chickens reared at two different densities. Appl Anim Behav Sci 84(4):281–296
Bach A, Dinares M, Devant M, Carre X (2007) Associations between lameness and production, feeding and milking attendance of Holstein cows milked with an automatic milking system. J Dairy Res 74(1):40–46
Balleine B (1992) Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends on incentive learning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 18(3):236–250
Balleine WB, Dickinson A (1998) The role of incentive learning in instrumental outcome revaluation by sensory-specific satiety. Anim Learn Behav 26(1):46–59
Bayer W (1990) Behavioural compensation for limiting grazing time by herded cattle in central Nigeria. Appl Anim Behav Sci 27(1–2):9–19
Beauchemin KA, Eriksen L, Nørgaard P, Rode LM (2008) Salivary secretion during meals in lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 91(5):2077–2081
Beaver JM, Olson BE (1997) Winter range use by cattle of different ages in south-western Montana. Appl Anim Behav Sci 51(1–2):1–13
Bizeray D, Estevez I, Leterrier C, Faure JM (2002) Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poult Sci 81(6):767–773
Blokhuis HJ (1986) Feather-pecking in poultry—its relation with ground-pecking. Appl Anim Behav Sci 16(1):63–67
Blokhuis HJ, Wiepkema PR (1989) Studies of feather pecking in poultry. Vet Q 20(1):6–9
Bokkers EAM, Koene P (2003) Behaviour of fast- and slow growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences. Appl Anim Behav Sci 81(1):59–72
Borderas TF, Rushen J, von Keyserlingk MAG, de Passillé AMB (2009) Automated measurement of changes in feeding behavior of milk-fed calves associated with illness. J Dairy Sci 92(9):4549–4554
Charlton GL, Rutter SM, East M, Sinclair LA (2011a) Preference of dairy cows: indoor cubicle housing with access to a total mixed ration vs. access to pasture. Appl Anim Behav Sci 130(1–2):1–9
Charlton GL, Rutter SM, East M, Sinclair LA (2011b) Effects of providing total mixed rations indoors and on pasture on the behavior of lactating dairy cattle and their preference to be indoors or on pasture. J Dairy Sci 94(8):3875–3884
Cook NB, Nordlund KV, Oetzel GR (2004) Environmental influences on claw horn lesions associated with laminitis and subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 87(Suppl):E36–E46
Cornou C, Vinther J, Kristensen AR (2008) Automatic detection of oestrus and health disorders using data from electronic sow feeders. Livest Sci 118(3):262–271
Curtis SE, Houpt KA (1983) Animal ethology: its emergence in animal science. J Anim Sci 57(2):234–247
D’Eath RB, Tolkamp BJ, Kyriazakis I, Lawrence AB (2009) ‘Freedom from hunger’ and preventing obesity: the animal welfare implications of reducing food quantity and quality. Anim Behav 77(2):275–288
Dawkins MS (1989) Time budgets in Red Junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Appl Anim Behav Sci 24(1):77–80
De Haer LCM, Merks JWM (1992) Patterns of daily food intake in growing pigs. Anim Prod 54(1):95–104
De Jong IC, Guemene D (2011) Major welfare issues in broiler breeders. Worlds Poult Sci J 67(1):73–81
De Jong IC, Jones B (2006) Feed restriction and welfare in domestic birds. In: Bels V (ed) Feeding in domestic vertebrates. CABI, Wallingford, pp 120–135
De Jong IC, van Voorst S, Ehlhardt DA, Blokhuis HJ (2002) Effects of restricted feeding on physiological stress parameters in growing broiler breeders. Br Poult Sci 43(2):157–168
De Jong IC, Fillerup M, Blokhuis HJ (2005a) Effect of scattered feeding and feeding twice a day during rearing on parameters of hunger and frustration in broiler breeders. Appl Anim Behav Sci 92(1–2):61–76
De Jong IC, Enting H, Van Voorst S, Ruesink EW, Blokhuis HJ (2005b) Do low density diets improve broiler breeder welfare during rearing and laying? Poult Sci 84(2):194–203
Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Sauvant D, Duvaux-Ponter C (2011) The use of a multivariate analysis to study between-goat variability in feeding behavior and associated rumen pH patterns. J Dairy Sci 94(2):842–852
DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG (2005) Time of fresh feed delivery affects the feeding and lying patterns of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 88(2):625–631
DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG (2006) Feed stalls affect the social and feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 89(9):3522–3531
DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG (2009) Competition for feed affects the feeding behavior of growing dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 92(8):3922–3929
DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG, Beauchemin KA (2003) Diurnal feeding pattern of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 86(12):4079–4082
DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM (2004) Effect of feeding space on the inter-cow distance, aggression, and feeding behavior of free-stall housed lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 87(5):1432–1438
DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG, Beauchemin KA (2005) Frequency of feed delivery affects the behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 88(10):3553–3562
DeVries TJ, Dohme F, Beauchemin KA (2008) Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: feed sorting. J Dairy Sci 91(10):3958–3967
DeVries TJ, Dufour S, Scholl DT (2010) Relationship between feeding strategy, lying behavior patterns, and incidence of intramammary infection in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 93(5):1987–1997
DeVries TJ, Holsthausen L, Oba M, Beauchemin KA (2011) Effect of parity and stage of lactation on feed sorting behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 94(8):4039–4045
Dixon LM, Brocklehurst S, Sandilands V, Bateson M, Tolkamp BJ, D’Eath RB (2014) Measuring motivation for appetitive behaviour: food-restricted broiler breeder chickens cross a water barrier to forage in an area of wood shavings without food. PLoS One 9(7):e102322
Dybkjær L, Jacobsen AP, Tøgersen FA, Poulsen HD (2006) Eating and drinking activity of newly weaned piglets: effects of individual characteristics, social mixing, and addition of extra zinc to the feed. J Anim Sci 84(3):702–711
EC [European Commission] (2001) Commission Directive 2001/93/EC of 9 November 2001 amending Directive 91/630/ EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Off J Eur Communities L 316:36–38, 1.12.2001
EFSA [European Food Safety Authority] (2010) Scientific opinion on welfare aspects of the management and housing of the grand-parent and parent stocks raised and kept for breeding purposes. EFSA J 8(7):1667 [81 p]
El-Lethey H, Aerni V, Jungi TW, Wechsler B (2000) Stress and feather pecking in laying hens in relation to housing conditions. Br Poult Sci 41(1):22–28
Endres MI, DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM (2005) Effect of feed barrier design on the behavior of loose-housed lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 88(7):2377–2380
Ferreira RA, Estrada LHC, Thiebaut JTL, Granados LBC, de Souza VR (2011) Evaluation of the behaviour of Santa Ines sheep in a silvopastoral system in the north of Rio de Janeiro state. Cienc Agrotecnol 35(2):399–403
Fish JA, DeVries TJ (2012) Varying dietary dry matter concentration through water addition: effect on nutrient intake and sorting of dairy cows in late lactation. J Dairy Sci 95(2):850–855
Fraser D, Phillips PA, Thompson BK, Tennessen T (1991) Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 30(3–4):307–318
Goldhawk C, Chapinal N, Veira DM, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG (2009) Pre-partum feeding behavior is an early indicator of subclinical ketosis. J Dairy Sci 92(10):4971–4977
González LA, Ferret A, Manteca X, Ruíz-de-la-Torre JL, Calsamiglia S, Devant M, Bach A (2008) Performance, behavior, and welfare of Friesian heifers housed in pens with two, four and eight individuals per concentrate feeding place. J Anim Sci 86(6):1446–1458
Guo YM, Zhang ZY, Ma JW, Ai HS, Ren J, Huang LS (2015) A genomewide association study of feed efficiency and feeding behaviors at two fattening stages in a White Duroc * Erhualian F population. J Anim Sci 93(4):1481–1489
Hafez ESE, Bouissou MF (1975) The behaviour of cattle. In: Hafez ESE (ed) The behaviour of domestic animals, 3rd edn. Bailliere Tindall, London, pp 203–245
Hansen I (1994) Behavioral expression of laying hens in aviaries and cages—frequencies, time budgets and facility utilization. Br Poult Sci 35(4):491–508
Harb M, Reynolds VS, Campling RC (1985) Eating behavior, social dominance and voluntary intake of silage in group-fed milking cattle. Grass Forage Sci 40(1):113–118
Hart KD, McBride BW, Duffield TF, DeVries TJ (2014) Effect of frequency of feed delivery on the behavior and productivity of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 97(3):1713–1724
Hejcmanova P, Stejskalova M, Pavlu V, Hejcman M (2009) Behavioural patterns of heifers under intensive and extensive continuous grazing on species-rich pasture in the Czech Republic. Appl Anim Behav Sci 117(3–4):137–143
Hinrichs B, Hoy S (2010) Sick sows come later to the electronic feeding station—results of a first statistical analysis. Landtechnik 65(4):272–275
Hocking PM (2006) High-fibre pelleted rations decrease water intake but do not improve physiological indexes of welfare in food-restricted female broiler breeders. Br Poult Sci 47(1):19–23
Hocking PM, Jones EKM (2006) On-farm assessment of environmental enrichment for broiler breeders. Br Poult Sci 47(4):418–425
Hocking PM, Maxwell MH, Mitchell MA (1996) Relationships between the degree of food restriction and welfare indices in broiler breeder females. Br Poult Sci 37(2):263–278
Hocking PM, Zaczek V, Jones EKM, McLeod MG (2004) Different concentrations and sources of dietary fibre may improve the welfare of female broiler breeders. Br Poult Sci 45(1):9–19
Hosseinkhani A, DeVries TJ, Proudfoot KL, Valizadeh R, Veira DM, von Keyserlingk MAG (2008) The effects of feed bunk competition on the feed sorting behavior of close-up dry cows. J Dairy Sci 91(3):1115–1121
Huzzey JM, DeVries TJ, Valois P, von Keyserlingk MAG (2006) Stocking density and feed barrier design affect the feeding and social behavior of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 89(1):126–133
Jensen MB (2004) Computer-controlled milk feeding of dairy calves: the effects of number of calves per feeder and number of milk portions on use of feeder and social behavior. J Dairy Sci 87(10):3428–3438
Jensen MB, de Passillé AMB, von Keyserlingk MAG, Rushen JP (2008) A barrier can reduce competition over teats in pair-housed milk-fed calves. J Dairy Sci 91(4):1607–1613
Jensen MB, Pedersen LJ, Theil PK, Yde CC, Knudsen KEB (2012) Feeding motivation and plasma metabolites in pregnant sows fed diets rich in dietary fiber either once or twice daily. J Anim Sci 90(6):1910–1919
Jones EKM, Zaczek V, McLeod M, Hocking PM (2004) Genotype, dietary manipulation and food allocation affect indices of welfare in broiler breeders. Br Poult Sci 45(6):725–737
Jordan D, Stuhec I, Bessei W (2011) Effect of whole wheat and feed pellets distribution in the litter on broilers’ activity and performance. Arch Geflugelkunde 75(2):98–103
Jung J, Yngvesson J, Jensen P (2002) Effects of reduced time on pasture caused by prolonged walking on behaviour and production of Mpwapwa Zebu cattle. Grass Forage Sci 57(2):105–112
Kirchner J, Manteuffel C, Manteuffel G, Schrader L (2014) Learning performance of gestating sows called to the feeder. Appl Anim Behav Sci 153:18–25
Kondo S, Sekine J, Okubo M, Asahida Y (1989) The effect of group size and space allowance on the agonistic spacing behaviour of cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 24(2):127–135
Krause KM, Oetzel G (2006) Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 126(3–4):215–236
Lawrence AB, Terlouw EMC (1993) A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. J Anim Sci 71(10):2815–2825
Leonardi C, Armentano LE (2003) Effect of quantity, quality, and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 86(2):557–564
Loetscher Y, Hospenthal AR, Kreuzer M, Messikommer RE (2014) Do antioxidants induce feed selection behavior in laying hens? Preference for, and palatability of, different antioxidant sources. Eur Poult Sci 78:1–11. doi:10.1399/eps.2014.65
Manteuffel G, Mannewitz A, Manteuffel C, Tuchscherer A, Schrader L (2010) Social hierarchy affects the adaption of pregnant sows to a call feeding learning paradigm. Appl Anim Behav Sci 128(1–4):30–36
Mantysaari P, Khalili H, Sariola J (2006) Effect of feeding frequency of a total mixed ration on the performance of high-yielding dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 89(11):4312–4320
Martin JE, Edwards SA (1994) Feeding behaviour of outdoor sows: the effects of diet quantity and type. Appl Anim Behav Sci 41(1–2):63–74
McGregor BA, Butler KL (2008) Relationship of body condition score, live weight, stocking rate and grazing system to the mortality of Angora goats from hypothermia and their use in the assessment of welfare risks. Aust Vet J 86(1–2):12–17
Mench JA (2002) Broiler breeders: feed restriction and welfare. Worlds Poult Sci J 58(1):23–29
Meunier-Salaün MC, Edwards SA, Robert S (2001) Effect of dietary fibre on the behaviour and health of the restricted-fed sow. Anim Feed Sci Technol 90(1–2):53–69, Special Issue
Miller K, Wood-Gush DGM (1991) Some effects of housing on the social behaviour of dairy cows. Anim Prod 53(3):271–278
Moinard C, Mendl M, Nicol CJ, Green LE (2003) A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 81(4):333–355
Morgan CA, Deans LA, Lawrence AB, Nielsen BL (1998) The effects of straw bedding on the feeding and social behaviour of growing pigs fed by means of single-space feeders. Appl Anim Behav Sci 58(1–2):23–33
Morgan CA, Nielsen BL, Lawrence AB, Mendl MT (1999) Describing the social environment and its effects on food intake and growth. In: Kyriazakis I, Forbes M (eds) Quantitative biology of the pig. CABI, Wallingford, pp 99–125
Morgan CA, McIlvaney K, Dwyer CM, Lawrence AB (2009) Assessing the welfare challenges to out-wintered pregnant suckler cows. Animal 3(8):1167–1174
Morgan-Davies C, Waterhouse A, Pollock ML, Milner JM (2008) Body condition score as an indicator of ewe survival under extensive conditions. Anim Welf 17(1):71–77
Morrow ATS, Walker N (1994) A note on changes to feeding behaviour of growing pigs by fitting stalls to single-space feeders. Anim Prod 59(1):151–153
Murphy KJ, Hayden TJ, Kent JP (2014) Chicks change their pecking behaviour towards stationary and mobile food sources over the first 12 weeks of life: improvement and discontinuities. PeerJ 2:e626
Nagaraja TG, Chengappa MM (1998) Liver abscesses in feedlot cattle: a review. J Anim Sci 76(1):287–298
Nielsen BL (1999a) On the interpretation of feeding behaviour measures and the use of feeding rate as an indicator of social constraint. Appl Anim Behav Sci 63(1):79–91
Nielsen BL (1999b) Perceived welfare issues in dairy cattle, with special emphasis on metabolic stress. In: Oldham JD, Simm G, Groen AF, Nielsen BL, Pryce JE, Lawrence TLJ (eds) Metabolic stress in dairy cows. British Society of Animal Science Occasional Publication, No. 24, Edinburgh, pp 1–7
Nielsen BL (2004) Behavioural aspects of feeding constraints: do broilers follow their gut feelings? Appl Anim Behav Sci 86(3–4):251–260
Nielsen BL, Lawrence AB, Whittemore CT (1995a) Effects of single-space feeder design on feeding behaviour and performance of growing pigs. Anim Sci 61(3):575–579
Nielsen BL, Lawrence AB, Whittemore CT (1995b) Effect of group size on feeding behaviour, social behaviour, and performance of growing pigs using single-space feeders. Livest Prod Sci 44(1):73–85
Nielsen BL, Lawrence AB, Whittemore CT (1996) Feeding behaviour of growing pigs using single or multi-space feeders. Appl Anim Behav Sci 47(3–4):235–246
Nielsen BL, Veerkamp RF, Lawrence AB (2000) Effects of genotype, feed type and lactational stage on the time budget of dairy cows. Acta Agric Scand Sect A Anim Sci 50(4):272–278
Nielsen BL, Litherland M, Nøddegaard F (2003) Effects of qualitative and quantitative feed restriction on the activity of broiler chickens. Appl Anim Behav Sci 83(4):309–323
Nielsen BL, Thodberg K, Malmkvist J, Steenfeldt S (2011) Proportion of insoluble fibre in the diet affects behaviour and hunger in broiler breeders growing at similar rates. Animal 5(8):1247–1258
Nordmann E, Keil NM, Schmied-Wagner C, Graml C, Langbein J, Aschwanden J, von Hof J, Maschat K, Palme R, Waiblinger S (2011) Feed barrier design affects behaviour and physiology in goats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 133(1–2):40–53
Nørgaard-Nielsen G, Vestergaard K, Simonsen HB (1993) Effects of rearing experience and stimulus enrichment on feather damage in laying hens. Appl Anim Behav Sci 38(3–4):345–352
Olofsson J (1999) Competition for total mixed diets fed for ad libitum intake using one or four cows per feeding station. J Dairy Sci 82(1):69–79
Olsson A-C, Andersson M, Botermans J, Rantzer D, Svendsen J (2011) Animal interaction and response to electronic sow feeding (ESF) in 3 different herds and effects of function settings to increase capacity. Livest Sci 137(1–3):268–272
Oostindjer M, Bolhuis JE, van den Brand H, Roura E, Kemp B (2010) Prenatal flavor exposure affects growth, health and behavior of newly weaned piglets. Physiol Behav 99(5):579–586
Oostindjer M, Munoz JM, van den Brand H, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE (2011a) Maternal presence and environmental enrichment affect food neophobia of piglets. Biol Lett 7(1):19–22
Oostindjer M, Bolhuis JE, Mendl M, Held S, van den Brand H, Kemp B (2011b) Learning how to eat like a pig: effectiveness of mechanisms for vertical social learning in piglets. Anim Behav 82(3):503–511
Oostindjer M, Kemp B, van den Brand H, Bolhuis JE (2014) Facilitating ‘learning from mom how to eat like a pig’ to improve welfare of piglets around weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 160:19–30
Pedersen LJ, Jensen MB (2009) Hunger in pregnant sows: the effect of fibre diet and free access to straw. In: Proceedings of the 43rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Cairns, Australia, p 122
Petersen V (1994) The development of feeding and investigatory behavior in free-ranging domestic pigs during their first 18 weeks of life. Appl Anim Behav Sci 42(2):87–98
Proudfoot KL, Veira DM, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG (2009) Competition at the feed bunk changes the feeding, standing, and social behavior of transition dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 92(7):3116–3123
Robert S, Matte JJ, Farmer C, Girard CL, Martineau GP (1993) High-fiber diets for sows—effects on stereotypies and adjunctive drinking. Appl Anim Behav Sci 37(4):297–309
Robles V, González LA, Ferret A, Mantexa X, Calsamiglia S (2007) Effects of feeding frequency on intake, ruminal fermentation, and feeding behavior in heifers fed high-concentrate diets. J Anim Sci 85(10):2538–2547
Rodenburg TB, van Krimpen MM, de Jong IC, de Haas EN, Kops MS, Riedstra BJ, Nordquist RE, Wagenaar JP, Bestman M, Nicol CJ (2013) The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. Worlds Poult Sci J 69(2):361–373
Rutter SM (2010) Grazing preferences in sheep and cattle: Implications for production, the environment and animal welfare. Can J Anim Sci 90(3):285–293
Sandilands V, Tolkamp BJ, Savory CJ, Kyriazakis I (2006) Behaviour and welfare of broiler breeders fed qualitatively restricted diets during rearing: are there viable alternatives to quantitative restriction? Appl Anim Behav Sci 96(1–2):53–67
Shabi Z, Bruckental I, Zamwell S, Tagari H, Arieli A (1999) Effects of extrusion of grain and feeding frequency on rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and milk yield and composition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 82(6):1252–1260
Shabi Z, Murphy MR, Moallem U (2005) Within-day feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows measured using a real-time control system. J Dairy Sci 88(5):1848–1854
Sheppard KC, Duncan IJH (2011) Feeding motivation on the incidence of floor eggs and extraneously calcified eggs laid by broiler breeder hens. Br Poult Sci 52(1):20–29
Soto-Navarro SA, Krehbiel CR, Duff GC, Galyean ML, Brown MS, Steiner RL (2000) Influence of feed intake fluctuation and frequency of feeding on nutrient digestion, digesta kinetics, and ruminal fermentation profiles in limit-fed steers. J Anim Sci 78(8):2215–2222
Sova AD, LeBlanc SJ, McBride BW, DeVries TJ (2013) Associations between herd-level feeding management practices, feed sorting, and milk production in freestall dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 96(7):4759–4770
Spoolder HAM, Burbidge JA, Edwards SA, Simmins PH, Lawrence AB (1995) Provision of straw as a foraging substrate reduces the development of excessive chain and bar manipulation in food restricted sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 43(4):249–262
Steenfeldt S, Kjaer JB, Engberg RM (2007) Effect of feeding silages or carrots as supplements to laying hens on production performance, nutrient digestibility, gut structure, gut microflora and feather pecking behaviour. Br Poult Sci 48(4):454–468
Stewart CL, Boyle LA, McCann MEE, O’Connell NE (2010) The effect of feeding a high fibre diet on the welfare of sows housed in large dynamic groups. Anim Welf 19(3):349–357
van de Weerd HA, Docking CM, Day JEL, Avery PJ, Edwards SA (2003) A systematic approach towards developing environmental enrichment for pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 84(2):101–118
van Krimpen MM, de Jong IC (2014) Impact of nutrition on welfare aspects of broiler breeder flocks. Worlds Poult Sci J 70(1):139–150
van Krimpen MM, Kwakkel RP, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, den Hartog LA, Verstegen MWA (2008) Low dietary energy concentration, high non-starch polysaccharide concentration, and coarse particle sizes of non-starch polysaccharides affect the behavior of feather-pecking-prone laying hens. Poult Sci 87(3):485–496
van Krimpen MM, Kwakkel RP, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, den Hartog LA, Verstegen MWA (2009) Effects of nutrient dilution and non-starch polysaccharide concentration in rearing and laying diets on eating behavior and feather damage of rearing and laying hens. Poult Sci 88(4):759–773
van Krimpen MM, Kwakkel RP, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, den Hartog LA, Verstegen MWA (2011) Effects of dietary energy concentration, nonstarch polysaccharide concentration, and particle sizes of nonstarch polysaccharides on digesta mean retention time and gut development in laying hens. Br Poult Sci 52(6):730–741
Villalba JJ, Catanese F, Provenza FD, Distel RA (2012) Relationships between early experience to dietary diversity, acceptance of novel flavors, and open field behavior in sheep. Physiol Behav 105(2):181–187
von Keyserlingk MAG, Brusius L, Weary DM (2004) Competition for teats and feeding behavior by group-housed dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 87(12):4190–4194
Watters MEA, Barkema HW, Leslie KE, von Keyserlingk MAG, DeVries TJ (2014) Relationship between post-milking standing duration and risk of intramammary infection in free-stall housed dairy cows milked three times per day. J Dairy Sci 97(6):3456–3471
Yan L, Jang HD, Kim IH (2011) Effects of varying creep feed duration on pre-weaning and post-weaning performance and behavior of piglet and sow. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 24(11):1601–1606
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Liat Romme Thomsen and Thea van Niekerk for their photographs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nielsen, B.L., de Jong, I.C., De Vries, T.J. (2016). The Use of Feeding Behaviour in the Assessment of Animal Welfare. In: Phillips, C. (eds) Nutrition and the Welfare of Farm Animals. Animal Welfare, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27356-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27356-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27354-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27356-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)