Abstract
We use agent-based simulation to compare the performance of four scheduling policies in youth health care. The policies deploy push/pull and centralized/decentralized concepts. The simulation model represents an authentic business case and is parameterized with actual market data. The model incorporates, among other things, non-stationary Poisson arrival processes, reneging and return mechanisms, and care provider’s client preferences. We have identified that performance measurement in youth health care should not be focused on queue lengths alone, which is presently the case, but should include a case difficulty parameter as well. The simulation results, together with contextual data obtained from stakeholder interviews, indicate that a push strategy with a centralized queue suits the sector best, which is different from the current real-world situation. This policy ensures a higher level of fairness in treatment provision because the care providers are compelled to take their share in treating the difficult and economically less attractive cases. The complexity of the case cannot be captured by current queuing theory methods. Our simulation approach incorporates these complexities, which turn out to be relevant for the scheduling policy decision. We validate the model and strategies using real market data and field expert discussions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This was the case until 1/1/2015 and reflects the data we used. Today however municipalities are responsible for managing youth care among other types of care.
References
Agarwal, R., Guodong (Gordon), G., DesRoches, C., Jha, A.K.: The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Inf. Syst. Res. 20(4), 796–809 (2010)
Andriessen, S., Besseling, J.: Jongeren zijn steeds vaker niet normaal. Jeugd Beleid 2(1), 87–95 (2008)
Armony, M., Plambeck, E., Seshadri, S.: Sensitivity of optimal capacity to customer impatience in an unobservable m/m/s queue (why you shouldnt shout at the dmv). Manufact. Serv. Oper. Manage. 11(1), 19–32 (2009)
Bagust, A., Place, M., Posnett, J.W.: Dynamics of bed use on accommodating emergency admissions: Stochastic simulation model. Br. Med. J. X, 319 (1999)
Bichler, M., Gupta, A., Ketter, W.: Designing smart markets. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 688–699 (2010)
Britan, G.R., Ferrer, J.C., e Oliveira, P.R.: Managing customer experiences: Perspectives on the temporal aspects of service encounters. Manuf. Servi. Oper. Manage. 1(1), 61–83 (2008)
Brown, L., Gans, N., Mandelbaum, A., Sakov, A., Shen, H., Zeltyn, S., Zhao, L.: Statistical analysis of a telephone call center. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100(469), 36–50 (2005)
Collins, J., Ketter, W., Gini, M.: A multi-agent negotiation testbed for contracting tasks with temporal and precedence constraints. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 7(1), 35–57 (2002)
Collins, J., Ketter, W., Sadeh, N.: Pushing the limits of rational agents: the trading agent competition for supply chain management. AI Mag. 31(2), 63–80 (2010)
Devaraj, S., Kohli, R.: Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 16(4), 41–67 (2000)
Fletcher, A., Halsall, D., Huxham, S., Worthington, D.: The dh accident and emergency department model: A national generic model used locally. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58, 1554–1562 (2007)
Goldman, R.D., Macpherson, A., Schuh, S., Mulligan, C., Pirie, J.: Patients who leave the pediatric emergency department without being seen: case-control study. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 172(1), 39–43 (2005)
Goodacre, S., Webster, A.: Who waits longest in the emergency department and who leaves without being seen? Emerg. Med. J. 22(2), 93 (2005)
Gorunescu, F., McClean, S.I., Millard, P.H.: A queueing model for bed-occupancy management and planning of hospitals. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53, 19–24 (2002)
Gupta, D., Denton, B.: Appointment scheduling in health care: Challenges and opportunities. IIE Trans. 40(9), 800–819 (2008)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 28(1), 75–106 (2004)
Jacobs, P.H.M., Lang, N.A., Verbraeck, A.: D-sol: A distributed java based discrete event simulation architecture. X, ed., In: Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference. San Diego, pp. 793–800. ISBN 0-7803-7614-5 (2002)
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(7), 172–180 (2005)
Ketter, W., Collins, J., Reddy, P.: Power TAC: A competitive economic simulation of the smart grid. Energy Econ. 39, 262–270 (2013)
Liu, N., Ziya, S., Kulkarni, V.G.: Dynamic scheduling of outpatient appointments under patient no-shows and cancellations. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 12(2), 347–364 (2010)
Netherlands National News Agency, NANP. 2008. Millions of additional funding for youth care
Postl, B.D.: Final report of the federal advisor on wait times. Technical Report, Health Canada (2006)
Rachlis, M.: Public solutions to health care wait lists. Technical Report, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (2005)
Ridge, J.C., Jones, S.K., Nielsen, M.S., Shahani, A.K.: Capacity planning for intensive care units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 105, 346–355 (1998)
Robinson, L.W., Chen, R.R.: Estimating the implied value of the customer’s waiting time. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 13(1), 53–57 (2011)
Saulnier, M., Shortt, S., Gruenwoldt, E.: The taming of the queue: Toward a cure for health care wait times. Technical Report, Canadian Medical Association (2004)
Van Mieghem, J.: Dynamic scheduling with convex delay costs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 5(3), 809–833 (1995)
Welch, P.D.: On the problem of the initial transient in steady-state simulation. IBM Watson Research Center (1981)
Welch, P.D.: The statistical analysis of simulation results. The computer performance modeling handbook 268–328 (1983)
Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 10(2), 115–152 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giesen, E., Ketter, W., Zuidwijk, R. (2015). Dynamic Agent-based Scheduling of Treatments: Evidence from the Dutch Youth Health Care Sector. In: Müller, J., Ketter, W., Kaminka, G., Wagner, G., Bulling, N. (eds) Multiagent System Technologies . MATES 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9433. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27343-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27343-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27342-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27343-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)