Skip to main content

Intra-arterial Treatment: Who and When

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Controversies in Vascular Neurosurgery

Abstract

Stroke causes 9 % of all deaths around the world and is the second most common cause of death after ischemic heart disease [1]. In the United States of America, stroke is the fourth most common cause of death with approximately 795,000 strokes occurring per year at an estimated annual cost of $36.5 billion [2]. Up to 87 % of strokes are ischemic in nature and secondary to embolic or thrombotic etiologies [2] where large vessel occlusions (LVO) fare poorly, with basilar artery, internal carotid artery (ICA), and middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions having mortality rates of 50 %, 35 %, and 24 %, respectively [3]. Furthermore, the natural history of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) for patients with a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) >10 is especially poor, and fewer than 25 % of patients will have a good clinical outcome (modified Rankin score (mRS) ≤2) [4]. As the incidence of stroke continues to increase in combination with greater awareness of the disease in the general population, new treatment options and expanding pathophysiological knowledge have allowed the medical community to delineate which patients benefit most from various treatment options currently available though many questions still remain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM. Stroke. Lancet. 2008;371:1612–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circular. 2013;127:e6–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith WS, et al. Significance of large vessel intracranial occlusion causing acute ischemic stroke and TIA. Stroke. 2009;40:3834–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ingall TJ, et al. Findings from the reanalysis of the NINDS tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke treatment trial. Stroke. 2004;35:2418–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Béjot Y, et al. Poststroke disposition and associated factors in a population-based study: the Dijon stroke registry. Stroke. 2012;43:2071–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Counsell C, Dennis M, McDowall M, Warlow C. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke. 2002;33(4):1041–7. doi:10.1161/hs0402.105909.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feigin VL, Parag V, Senior H. Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study. Neurology. 2010;75:1608–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knoflach M, et al. Functional recovery after ischemic stroke – a matter of age. Neurology. 2012;78:279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heuschmann PU, et al. Three-month stroke outcome: the European Registers of Stroke (EROS) investigators. Neurology. 2011;76:159–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koennecke H-C, et al. Factors influencing in-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients treated on a stroke unit. Neurology. 2011;77:965–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. König IR, et al. Predicting long-term outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a simple index works in patients from controlled clinical trials. Stroke. 2008;39:1821–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weimar C, König IR, Kraywinkel K, Ziegler A, Diener HC. Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score within 6 hours after onset are accurate predictors of outcome after cerebral ischemia: development and external validation of prognostic models. Stroke. 2004;35:158–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong KS. Risk factors for early death in acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective hospital-based study in Asia. Stroke. 1999;30:2326–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Andersen KK, Andersen ZJ, Olsen TS. Predictors of early and late case-fatality in a nationwide Danish study of 26 818 patients with first-ever ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:2806–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Qureshi AI, Suri MFK, Georgiadis AL, Vazquez G, Janjua NA. Intra-arterial recanalization techniques for patients 80 years or older with acute ischemic stroke: pooled analysis from 4 prospective studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1184–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mono M-L, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in octogenarians. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33:116–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Duffis EJ, He W, Prestigiacomo CJ, Gandhi CD. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in octogenarians compared with younger patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:308–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Emberson J, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the eff ects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384:4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Berkhemer OA, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014;372:11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goyal M, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1019–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Troke STS, Roup STG. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hacke W, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317–29.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lansberg MG, Schrooten M, Bluhmki E, Thijs VN, Saver JL. Treatment time-specific number needed to treat estimates for tissue plasminogen activator therapy in acute stroke based on shifts over the entire range of the modified rankin scale. Stroke. 2009;40:2079–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed N, et al. Implementation and outcome of thrombolysis with alteplase 3–4·5 h after an acute stroke: an updated analysis from SITS-ISTR. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:866–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Los Ríos La Rosa F, et al. Eligibility for intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator within a population: the effect of the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III trial. Stroke. 2012;43:1591–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jauch EC, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:870–947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saqqur M, et al. Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:948–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Silva DA, et al. The benefits of intravenous thrombolysis relate to the site of baseline arterial occlusion in the echoplanar imaging thrombolytic evaluation trial (EPITHET). Stroke. 2010;41:295–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paciaroni M, et al. Systemic thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and Internal Carotid ARtery Occlusion: the ICARO study. Stroke. 2012;43:125–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dabus G, Linfante I. The natural history of acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial large-vessel occlusion: what do we know? Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;15:2–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rubin MN, Barrett KM. What to do with wake-up stroke. Neurohospitalist. 2015;5:161–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomalla G, et al. DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:978–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomalla G, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance imaging-based thrombolysis in wake-up stroke (WAKE-UP). Int J Stroke. 2014;9:829–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Koga M, et al. THrombolysis for acute wake-up and unclear-onset strokes with alteplase at 0·6 mg/kg (THAWS) trial. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:1117–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ma H, et al. A multicentre, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III study to investigate EXtending the time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits (EXTEND). Int J Stroke. 2012;7:74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kidwell CS, et al. Late secondary ischemic injury in patients receiving intraarterial thrombolysis. Ann Neurol. 2002;52:698–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kidwell CS, et al. Thrombolytic reversal of acute human cerebral ischemic injury shown by diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:462–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wintermark M, et al. Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:979–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Butcher KS, et al. Refining the perfusion-diffusion mismatch hypothesis. Stroke. 2005;36:1153–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hacke W, et al. NIH public access. Analysis. 2010;8:141–50.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lansberg MG, et al. MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(10):860–7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Albers GW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:508–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Davis SM, et al. Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:299–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lansberg MG, et al. RAPID automated patient selection for reperfusion therapy: a pooled analysis of the echoplanar imaging thrombolytic evaluation trial (EPITHET) and the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Stroke. 2011;42:1608–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kidwell CS, et al. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(10):914–23.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Edgell RC, Vora NA. Neuroimaging markers of hemorrhagic risk with stroke reperfusion therapy. Neurology. 2012;79(13 Suppl 1):S100–4.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Latchaw RE, et al. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Stroke. 2009;40:3646–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pexman JHW, et al. Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1534–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mortimer AM, Bradley MD, Renowden SA. Endovascular therapy in hyperacute ischaemic stroke: history and current status. Interv Neuroradiol. 2013;19:506–18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Broderick JP, et al. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:893–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashid M. Janjua MD, MBA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hedayat, H.S., Janjua, R.M. (2016). Intra-arterial Treatment: Who and When. In: Veznedaroglu, E. (eds) Controversies in Vascular Neurosurgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27315-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27315-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27313-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27315-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics