Abstract
Stroke causes 9 % of all deaths around the world and is the second most common cause of death after ischemic heart disease [1]. In the United States of America, stroke is the fourth most common cause of death with approximately 795,000 strokes occurring per year at an estimated annual cost of $36.5 billion [2]. Up to 87 % of strokes are ischemic in nature and secondary to embolic or thrombotic etiologies [2] where large vessel occlusions (LVO) fare poorly, with basilar artery, internal carotid artery (ICA), and middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions having mortality rates of 50 %, 35 %, and 24 %, respectively [3]. Furthermore, the natural history of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) for patients with a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) >10 is especially poor, and fewer than 25 % of patients will have a good clinical outcome (modified Rankin score (mRS) ≤2) [4]. As the incidence of stroke continues to increase in combination with greater awareness of the disease in the general population, new treatment options and expanding pathophysiological knowledge have allowed the medical community to delineate which patients benefit most from various treatment options currently available though many questions still remain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM. Stroke. Lancet. 2008;371:1612–23.
Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circular. 2013;127:e6–245.
Smith WS, et al. Significance of large vessel intracranial occlusion causing acute ischemic stroke and TIA. Stroke. 2009;40:3834–40.
Ingall TJ, et al. Findings from the reanalysis of the NINDS tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke treatment trial. Stroke. 2004;35:2418–24.
Béjot Y, et al. Poststroke disposition and associated factors in a population-based study: the Dijon stroke registry. Stroke. 2012;43:2071–7.
Counsell C, Dennis M, McDowall M, Warlow C. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke. 2002;33(4):1041–7. doi:10.1161/hs0402.105909.
Feigin VL, Parag V, Senior H. Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study. Neurology. 2010;75:1608–16.
Knoflach M, et al. Functional recovery after ischemic stroke – a matter of age. Neurology. 2012;78:279.
Heuschmann PU, et al. Three-month stroke outcome: the European Registers of Stroke (EROS) investigators. Neurology. 2011;76:159–65.
Koennecke H-C, et al. Factors influencing in-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients treated on a stroke unit. Neurology. 2011;77:965–72.
König IR, et al. Predicting long-term outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a simple index works in patients from controlled clinical trials. Stroke. 2008;39:1821–6.
Weimar C, König IR, Kraywinkel K, Ziegler A, Diener HC. Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score within 6 hours after onset are accurate predictors of outcome after cerebral ischemia: development and external validation of prognostic models. Stroke. 2004;35:158–62.
Wong KS. Risk factors for early death in acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective hospital-based study in Asia. Stroke. 1999;30:2326–30.
Andersen KK, Andersen ZJ, Olsen TS. Predictors of early and late case-fatality in a nationwide Danish study of 26 818 patients with first-ever ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:2806–12.
Qureshi AI, Suri MFK, Georgiadis AL, Vazquez G, Janjua NA. Intra-arterial recanalization techniques for patients 80 years or older with acute ischemic stroke: pooled analysis from 4 prospective studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1184–9.
Mono M-L, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in octogenarians. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33:116–22.
Duffis EJ, He W, Prestigiacomo CJ, Gandhi CD. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in octogenarians compared with younger patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:308–12.
Emberson J, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the eff ects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384:4–10.
Berkhemer OA, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014;372:11–20.
Goyal M, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1019–30.
Troke STS, Roup STG. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–7.
Hacke W, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(13):1317–29.
Lansberg MG, Schrooten M, Bluhmki E, Thijs VN, Saver JL. Treatment time-specific number needed to treat estimates for tissue plasminogen activator therapy in acute stroke based on shifts over the entire range of the modified rankin scale. Stroke. 2009;40:2079–84.
Ahmed N, et al. Implementation and outcome of thrombolysis with alteplase 3–4·5 h after an acute stroke: an updated analysis from SITS-ISTR. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:866–74.
De Los Ríos La Rosa F, et al. Eligibility for intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator within a population: the effect of the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III trial. Stroke. 2012;43:1591–5.
Jauch EC, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:870–947.
Saqqur M, et al. Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:948–54.
De Silva DA, et al. The benefits of intravenous thrombolysis relate to the site of baseline arterial occlusion in the echoplanar imaging thrombolytic evaluation trial (EPITHET). Stroke. 2010;41:295–9.
Paciaroni M, et al. Systemic thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and Internal Carotid ARtery Occlusion: the ICARO study. Stroke. 2012;43:125–30.
Dabus G, Linfante I. The natural history of acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial large-vessel occlusion: what do we know? Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;15:2–4.
Rubin MN, Barrett KM. What to do with wake-up stroke. Neurohospitalist. 2015;5:161–72.
Thomalla G, et al. DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:978–86.
Thomalla G, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance imaging-based thrombolysis in wake-up stroke (WAKE-UP). Int J Stroke. 2014;9:829–36.
Koga M, et al. THrombolysis for acute wake-up and unclear-onset strokes with alteplase at 0·6 mg/kg (THAWS) trial. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:1117–24.
Ma H, et al. A multicentre, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III study to investigate EXtending the time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits (EXTEND). Int J Stroke. 2012;7:74–80.
Kidwell CS, et al. Late secondary ischemic injury in patients receiving intraarterial thrombolysis. Ann Neurol. 2002;52:698–703.
Kidwell CS, et al. Thrombolytic reversal of acute human cerebral ischemic injury shown by diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2000;47:462–9.
Wintermark M, et al. Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:979–85.
Butcher KS, et al. Refining the perfusion-diffusion mismatch hypothesis. Stroke. 2005;36:1153–9.
Hacke W, et al. NIH public access. Analysis. 2010;8:141–50.
Lansberg MG, et al. MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(10):860–7.
Albers GW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:508–17.
Davis SM, et al. Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:299–309.
Lansberg MG, et al. RAPID automated patient selection for reperfusion therapy: a pooled analysis of the echoplanar imaging thrombolytic evaluation trial (EPITHET) and the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Stroke. 2011;42:1608–14.
Kidwell CS, et al. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(10):914–23.
Edgell RC, Vora NA. Neuroimaging markers of hemorrhagic risk with stroke reperfusion therapy. Neurology. 2012;79(13 Suppl 1):S100–4.
Latchaw RE, et al. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Stroke. 2009;40:3646–78.
Pexman JHW, et al. Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1534–42.
Mortimer AM, Bradley MD, Renowden SA. Endovascular therapy in hyperacute ischaemic stroke: history and current status. Interv Neuroradiol. 2013;19:506–18.
Broderick JP, et al. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:893–903.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hedayat, H.S., Janjua, R.M. (2016). Intra-arterial Treatment: Who and When. In: Veznedaroglu, E. (eds) Controversies in Vascular Neurosurgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27315-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27315-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27313-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27315-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)