Skip to main content

Improving Situation Awareness and Reporting Using the Emergency Response Intelligence Capability Tool

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Media for Government Services
  • 1286 Accesses

Abstract

The Emergency Response Intelligence Capability (ERIC) tool automatically gathers data about emergency events from authoritative web sources, harmonizes the information content and presents it on an interactive map. All data is recorded in a database which allows the changing status of emergency events to be identified and provides an archive for historical review. ERIC is used by the Australian Government Department of Human Services Emergency Management team who is responsible for intelligence gathering and situation reporting during emergency events. Event information is combined with demographic data to profile the affected community. Identifying relevant community attributes, such as languages spoken or socioeconomic information, allows the department to tailor its response appropriately to better support the impacted community. An overview of ERIC is presented, including examples of its use by the department and the difficulties overcome in establishing and maintaining a nationally consistent harmonized model of emergency event information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Collectively referred to as personnel communication, pers. comm., in Table 1.

  2. 2.

    See GeoCommons: http://geocommons.com/.

  3. 3.

    See for example: http://stat.abs.gov.au/itt/r.jsp?api.

  4. 4.

    The ABS releases demographics data into hierarchical regions called Statistical Areas (SAs), ranging from the largest SA4 down to the smallest SA1.

References

  1. Anderson, M. (2012, April 16–18). Integrating social media into traditional emergency management command and control structures: The square peg into the round hole? In Disaster and Emergency Management Conference Proceedings (pp. 18–34). Brisbane, Australia. ISBN: 978-0-9808147-4-3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chatfield, A. T., Scholl, H. J., & Brajawidagda, U. (2014, January). ‘# Sandy tweets: Citizens’ co-production of time-critical information during an unfolding catastrophe. In 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS) (pp. 1947–1957).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Power, R., Robinson, B., & Wise, C. (2013, May 13–17). Comparing web feeds and tweets for emergency management. In Social Web for Disaster Management (SWDM) Workshop 2013. WWW 2013 Companion (pp. 1007–1010). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Power, R., Wise, C., Robinson, B., & Squire, G. (2013, December). Harmonising web feeds for emergency management. In Piantadosi, J., Anderssen, R. S. & Boland, J. (Eds.), MODSIM 2013 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand (pp. 2194–2200). ISBN: 978-0-9872143-3-1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Power, R., Robinson, B., Colton, J., & Cameron, M. (2014, October). Emergency situation awareness: Twitter case studies. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference, ISCRAM-med (Vol. 196 of LNBIP, pp. 218–231). Toulouse, France: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomson, R., Ito, N., Suda, H., Lin, F., Liu, Y., Hayasaka, R. et al. (2012, April). Trusting tweets: The fukushima disaster and information source credibility on Twitter. In The 9th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM). Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

ERIC was funded under the Human Services Delivery Research Alliance between the CSIRO and the Australian Government Department of Human Services. Thanks to the Human Services Emergency Management team for supporting the ERIC work, especially Lucy Knight and John Dickinson. The following CSIRO colleagues worked on the ERIC project: Michael Compton, David Ratcliffe, Bella Robinson, Geoffrey Squire and Catherine Wise. Special note should be made to Catherine and Geoff as the main developers for the tool and Catherine prepared Fig. 3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Power .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Power, R. (2015). Improving Situation Awareness and Reporting Using the Emergency Response Intelligence Capability Tool. In: Nepal, S., Paris, C., Georgakopoulos, D. (eds) Social Media for Government Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27237-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27237-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27235-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27237-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics