Frustration and Termination by Notice

  • Neil Andrews
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 54)

Abstract

The central proposition is that mere hardship or difficulty or increased expense will not form the basis for terminating the contract under general law. Instead the doctrine of frustration is confined to supervening impossibility, (non-culpable and non-elective) incapacitation, or illegality. Another topic treated here is contracts of indefinite duration. These are normally capable of being terminated by one party giving reasonable notice to the other.

Keywords

Fixed Duration Unjust Enrichment Implied Term Reasonable Notice Express Term 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil Andrews
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of LawCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations