Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Series of Numerical Mathematics ((ISNM,volume 168))

  • 3230 Accesses

Abstract

We now turn to numerical methods that can be used to approximate the solution of the heat equation. We develop the finite difference method in great detail, with particular emphasis on stability issues, which are delicate. We concentrate on the heat equation in one dimension of space, with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. We also give some indications about finite difference (in time)-finite element (in space) approximation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For consistency with the notation used in the stationary case, we should denote these vectors \(U^j_{h,k}\). We drop the hk index for brevity, but of course, these vectors crucially depend on h and k.

  2. 2.

    Here also, the vectors \(F^j\) and \(U_0\) depend respectively on h and k, and on h.

  3. 3.

    This is the same computation as in Chap. 2.

  4. 4.

    Well, actually it may well be known somewhere in the literature, but let us assume it is not known for the sake of the argument.

  5. 5.

    Note that stability is also affected by the general form used to write the scheme, via the term \(\widetilde{F}^j\), see Proposition 8.3 and Remark 8.12 for a more precise statement.

  6. 6.

    For an easier visualization, we also plot a linear interpolation of the finite difference discrete values.

  7. 7.

    Beware of the notation: up to now \(V^j\) meant the jth vector in the sequence, but here \(\mathscr {A}^j\) means the jth power of the matrix \(\mathscr {A}\).

  8. 8.

    This is the only relevant case.

  9. 9.

    For any matrix A, \(A^*\) denotes the adjoint matrix of A, i.e., its conjugate transpose.

  10. 10.

    Again, beware of the notation: \(u^j\) is the jth element in the sequence, whereas \(\mathscr {T}^j\) is the jth iterate of the operator \(\mathscr {T}\).

  11. 11.

    Again, beware of the notation: here \(\mathscr {G}^j\) is the jth iterate of \(\mathscr {G}\) and \(a^j\) is the function a to the power j.

  12. 12.

    Here again, G depends on h and k even though the notation does not make it plain.

  13. 13.

    Again, beware of the notation: \(u^j\) is the jth function in the sequence, whereas \(G^j\) is the jth iterate of the operator G and \(a^j\) is the function a to the power j.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hervé Le Dret .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Le Dret, H., Lucquin, B. (2016). The Finite Difference Method for the Heat Equation. In: Partial Differential Equations: Modeling, Analysis and Numerical Approximation. International Series of Numerical Mathematics, vol 168. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27067-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics