Skip to main content

Abstract

PHM (Prognostics and Health Management) is key factor for reaching more proactive maintenance models. Its applicability depends, among others, on the development of general methodological approaches to guide the design process of new maintenance strategies where the potential of PHM can be exploited. Despite there are few specific standards that treat PHM is possible to use current standards of maintenance and diagnostic as the bases of the development of this general methodologies. This paper offers a revision of some of the available standards that can serve as guidelines to develop such solutions including a proposal of methodology to design and implement PHM solutions that combines current standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cheng, S., Azarian, M., & Pecht, M. (2010). Sensor systems for prognostics and health management. Sensors, 10, 5774–5797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, A., & Gupta, J. (2006). Contemporary maintenance management: Process, framework and supporting pillars. Omega, 34(3), 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, A. J., Gómez, J., Crespo, A., & Guerrero, A. (2014). Towards the industrial application of PHM: Challenges and methodological approach. In PHM Society European Conference 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, G., Sandborn, P., & Pecht, M. (2012). An options approach for decision support of systems with prognostic capabilities. IEE Transactions on Reliablity, 61(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Electrotechnical Commission. (2006). IEC 60812—Analysis techniques for system reliability—Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2003). ISO 13374-1:2003—Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines—Data processing, communication and presentation—Part 1: General guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2004). ISO 13381-1:2004—Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines—Prognostics—Part 1: General guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2011a). ISO 17359:2011—Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines—General guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization. (2012b). ISO 13379-1:2012—Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines—Data interpretation and diagnostics techniques—Part 1: General guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, A., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition based maintenance. MechSyst Signal Process, 20, 1483–1510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Ni, J., Djurdjanovic, D., Qiu, H., & Liao, H. (2006). Intelligent prognostics tools and e-maintenance. Computers in Industry, 57, 476–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, S. (2012). PHM standards—IEEE PHM standard. https://www.phmsociety.org/sites/phmsociety.org/files/PHM%20Society%20Standards%20Research%20Panel_IEEE%20PHM.pdf

  • MIMOSA. (2012). OpenO&M industrial capital project plant information handover best practices guide, MIMOSA 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moubray, J. (1997). RCM II: Reliability-centred maintenance. New York: Industrial Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J., Kaufman, M., & Wilmering, T. (2008). IEEE standards for prognostics and health management. IEEE AUTOTESTCON.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Army. (2013). ADS-79D-HDBK—Aeronautical design standard handbook for condition based maintenance systems for US Army Aircraft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogl, G. W., Weiss, B. A., & Donmez, M. A. (2014). Standards for prognostics and health management (PHM) techniques within manufacturing operations. In Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachtsevanos, G., Lewis, F., Roemer, M., Hess, A., & Wu, B. (2006). Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waeyenbergh, G., & Pintelon, L. (2002). A framework for maintenance concept development. International Journal Production Economics, 77, 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio J. Guillén .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guillén, A.J., González-Prida, V., Gómez, J.F., Crespo, A. (2016). Standards as Reference to Build a PHM-Based Solution. In: Koskinen, K., et al. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2015). Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27064-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27064-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27062-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27064-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics