Skip to main content

Social Assistance: Analysis of the Fundamental Right Based on the 20-Year Experience of Law 8.472/93

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assistance Benefits in Brazil
  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

There are two essential points that the text deals with: the qualification of social care as a social right and the character of constitutional program granted to social inclusion. Thus, interests on social assistance to identify social needs and, consequently, carrying out the measures—benefits, services, projects, and programs—able to transform the social reality in which the poor live. Everything will be done so that they give full implementation of the task of eradicating poverty and marginalization, qualified by art. 3, III, of the Constitution of Brazil as the magnum social constitutional goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Only to cite three recent criteria for definition. The Objectives of the Development of the Millenium qualify as extremely poor those who receive the equivalent to U$ 1,25 per capita a Day. The program Bolsa-FamĂ­lia (Family Allowance), chief program of the social initiatives of the Brazilian government defines the amount of R$ 70.00 to the per capita family monthly income and the program of the LOAS benefit defines the per capita family income as up to one fourth of the minimum wage.

  2. 2.

    Kelsen (1974) affirms that “The legal science searches to seize its object “legally”, that is, from the point of view of the Law. To legally seize something therefore cannot mean nothing but seize something as Law, which means: as a legal rule, or content of a legal rule, as determined through a legal rule”.

  3. 3.

    Constitutional Amendments n. 42, of 2003, and 67, of 2010, extended for an indeterminate period the existence of such social fund.

  4. 4.

    Decree n. 807, de 1993.

  5. 5.

    The primeiro-damismo began with the creation of LBA—Brazilian Legion of Assistance, one of the pillars of social assistance until the enactment of the Constitution of 1988. LBA would be chaired by the first-lady (primeira dama) of the country, DARCY SARMANHO VARGAS and this model set an example… The first-lady is the “mother” of the poor and of the destitute. As well qualified by ALDAISA SPOSATI: “The “primeiro-damismo” is the institutionalization of assistencialismo in the figure of the wife of the ruler (…) In Núcleo de Seguridade e Assistência Social da PUC/SP. Texto” Assistência x Assistencialismo x Assistência Social. junho/1994.

  6. 6.

    Raichelis (2000).

  7. 7.

    Art. 204. The governmental actions in the field of social assistance will be performed with resources from the budget of the social security, prescribed in Art. 195, in addition to other sources, and organized by the following guidelines:

    I – coordination and for the general rules, and the state and municipal governments are responsible for the coordination and the execution of the respective programs, as well as the beneficial entities and the social assistance entities;

    II – participation of the population, by means of representative organizations, in the creation of the policies and in the control of the actions at all levels.

  8. 8.

    The current Regulation is Decree n. 6.214, of 2007.

  9. 9.

    In COMPLAINT 4.374, whose justice-rapporteur was Justice GILMAR MENDER, the Full Supreme Federal Court, in a decision of April 18th of 2013, changing a previous position, maintained the decision for the special jurisdictional line and considered such restriction unconstitutional (http://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=4439489).

References

  • Almansa Pastor JM (1991) Derecho de La Seguridad Social, 7ÂŞ edição. TEcnos, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen H (1974) Teoria Pura do Direito, tradução de JoĂŁo Baptista Machado, ArmĂŞnio Amado – Editor, Sucessor, 3ÂŞ ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persiani M (1981) Lezioni di Diritto della Previdenza Sociale. CEDAM, Padova

    Google Scholar 

  • Raichelis R (2000) Esfera PĂşblica e Conselhos de AssistĂŞncia Social – caminhos da construção democrática, 2ÂŞ edição. Cortez, SĂŁo Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Reale M (1968) O direito como experiĂŞncia. Saraiva, SĂŁo Paulo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wagner Balera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balera, W. (2016). Social Assistance: Analysis of the Fundamental Right Based on the 20-Year Experience of Law 8.472/93. In: Serau Junior, M., Caetano Costa, J. (eds) Assistance Benefits in Brazil. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27046-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27046-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27044-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27046-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics