Skip to main content

The Twenty-First Century and the Expectations Placed upon Public Administration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Between Globalization and Integration

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

  • 493 Accesses

Abstract

The twenty-first century, still in its infancy, promises to be challenging and full of surprises. As we survey the world around us, east, west, north, or south, we see how governments, technology, multinational corporations, labor unions, the invisible capital markets, and the international governing agencies are reshaping the way we live, compete, and collaborate. These global macro-changes are especially affecting public administrators all over the world, as they are struggling to redefine and fulfill their responsibilities facing insurmountable challenges ranging from declining budgets, anemic economic growth, environmental pollution, the aging of their population, technology, free-market capitalism, unrestricted movement of labor, etc. How to survive and thrive in this new challenging era has been the topic of intense debate and research. The challenge is almost universal: governments must provide and enhance goods and services of a higher quality on diminishing budgets constrained by the global financial and economic crises (Davis, 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, J. (2005). Hegemony: The new shape of global power. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H. (2007). Escape from Empire: The developing world’s journey through heaven and hell. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M. (2001). The new public management: Improving research and policy dialogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, J., & Costello, T. (1994). Global village or global pillage: Economic reconstruction from the bottom up. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society, and the rising culture. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders’. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, H. (1999, March 18–23). The market as god: Living in the new dispensation. The Atlantic Monthly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crăciun, C. (2008). The transformation of governance in Romania. Challenges for public policy management. In C. Crăciun & P. E. Collins (Eds.), Public policies management: Changes and perspectives. Iaşi, Romania: Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). Hyper-competition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, I. (2007, October). Government as a business. McKinsey Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, R. B. (2004). Trust as capacity: The role of integrity and responsiveness. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovations (pp. 99–111). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, J. D., Joseph, S., & Nye, J. (Eds.). (2002). Market-based governance: Supply side, demand side, upside, downside. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, Y. (2001). The capacity to govern: A report to the club of Rome. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1962). The practice of management. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, W. M. (1989). Corporate hegemony. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, O. P., Khator, R., & Nef, J. (2007). Managing development in a global context. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2002). The elusive quest for growth: Economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, D. S., & Bushnell, R. A. (1977). The limits to complexity: Are bureaucracies becoming unmanageable? The Futurist, 11, 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2003). Chaos and transformation theories: A theoretical analysis with implications for organization theory and public management. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 3(4), 339–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (Ed.). (2004). Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovations. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (2009). Building administrative capacity for an age of rapid globalization: A modest prescription for twenty-first century. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1007–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2004). Colossus: The price of America’s empire. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, T. (2000). One market under god: Extreme capitalism, market populism, and the end of economic democracy. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L. (1999). The lexus and the olive tree. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and of the last man. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (2006). Taming predatory capitalism. The Nation, 282(1), 23–24. Retrieved from http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060417/forum/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, K. H. (2001). Making sense of post-communist central administration: Modernization, Europeanization or Latinization? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), 1032–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1998). False dawn: The delusions of global capitalism. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973). What does a crisis mean today? Legitimating problems in late capitalism. Social Research, 40(4), 39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, G. (1989). Lords of poverty: The power, prestige, and corruption of the international aid business. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1990). The age of unreason. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1998). Beyond certainty: The changing worlds of organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, F. (1996). Public administration: A comparative perspective (5th ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S. (2006). Chaos and violence: What globalization, failed states, and terrorism mean for U.S. foreign policy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horga, I. (2004). Romania and its historical peculiarities amongst the newcomers in the European Union. In A. Landuyt (Ed.), Political space in the history of European integration. The enlargements of the EEC/EU (1961–2002) (pp. 576–604). Siena, Italy: University of Siena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2006). Nemesis: The last days of the American Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. D. (2000). The coming anarchy: Shattering the dreams of the post cold war. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettl, D. F. (2006a). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review, 66, 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettl, D. F. (2006b). Modernizing government: The way forward-a comment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(3), 313–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiel, L. D. (1994). Managing chaos and complexity in government: A new paradigm for managing change, innovation, and organizational renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. C. (2001). When corporations rule the world (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society: A framework for political inquiry (Vol. 11). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, C. (2006). The unipolar illusion revisited. The coming end of the United States unipolar movement. International Security, 31(1), 7–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E. (1991). Public entrepreneurship: Toward a theory of bureaucratic power. Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, B. (2004). Global crises, global solutions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. (1996). Chaos theory as a model for managing issues and crises. Public Relations Review, 22(2), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1988). Creating organizational order out of chaos: Self-renewal in Japanese firms. California Management Review, 30(3), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. (1973). The fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world: Power and strategy in the interlinked economy. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2001). The future of governing: Four emerging models (2nd ed.). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priesmeyer, H. R. (1992). Organizations and chaos: Defining the methods of nonlinear management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, W. (2005). Greed, Inc.: How corporations rule our world and why we let it happen. Toronto, Canada: Thomas Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallnow, J. (1990). Is it aid or is it neocolonialism? Economic Geography, 62, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savas, E. S. (1982). Privatizing the public sector—How to shrink government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (1992). Managing the unknowable: Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavis, L. A. (Ed.). (1982). Multinational managers and poverty in the third world. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2001). Road map towards the Implementation of the United Nations millennium declaration: Report of the secretary general. New York: UN Publishing Section.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2005a). UN global e-government readiness report 2005. New York: UN Publishing Section.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2005b). Unlocking human potential for public sector performance: World public sector report. New York: UN Publishing Section.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2007, June 26–29). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century. Report by Peri K. Blind. United Nations Global Forum on Reinventing Government, Vienna. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN025062.pdf.

  • Waldo, D. (1992). The enterprise of public administration: A summary view. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. M. Henderson &T. Parsons, Trans.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., Kathleen, E., & Sutcliffe, M. (2001). Managing the unexpected. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2004). Why globalization works. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamfir, C. (2004). O analiză critică a tranziției. Ce va fi “după” [A critical analysis of transition. What will it be “after”?]. Iaşi, Romania: Editura Polirom.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Š 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Văduva, S. (2016). The Twenty-First Century and the Expectations Placed upon Public Administration. In: Between Globalization and Integration. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27009-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics