Skip to main content

Microbiological Assessment of Sewage Sludge in Terms of Use as a Fertilizer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Solutions to Combat Global Warming

Abstract

Sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plant was examined for the existence of microorganisms of several major groups such as Gram-negative aerobic bacteria, E. coli, Clostridium perfringens, the genera Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, fungi, and the total number of microorganisms, in order to assess the epizootiological safety of the final product. In parallel similar study was made of composted cattle manure and a comparison of the results was made with the ready for manuring compost in order to assess the possibilities for the use of sludge for fertilizing. It was found that the examined sewage sludge were rich in microorganisms from studied groups and their direct application in soils without prior treatment is not recommended of epizootiological point of view. Methods of processing of sewage sludge should be consistent with epidemiological safety of the final products, but also be aimed at reducing the pollutants’ emissions released during the cycle of wastewater sludge, which contribute to global warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Langenkamp H, Part P (2001) Organic contaminants in sewage sludge for agricultural use. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Soil and Waste Unit. Brussels, Belgium, pp 1–73

    Google Scholar 

  2. EPA (2004) United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Wastewater Management. Washington, DC 20460 (2004). Primer for Municipal Waste Water Treatment Systems. Document no EPA 832-R-04-001

    Google Scholar 

  3. Talahassee FL (2010) Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Ultraviolet disinfection for domestic waste water, 17 Mar 2010

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harshman V, Barnette T (2000) Wastewater odor control: an evaluation of technologies. Water Engineering and Management, 28 Dec 2000. ISSN:0273-2238

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ivanov VN, Wang JY, Stabnikova OV, Tay STL, Tay JH (2004) Microbiological monitoring in the biodegradation of sewage sludge and food waste. J Appl Microbiol 96(4):641–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2013) Guidance. Managing sewage sludge, slurry and silage. Farming and the environment. Gov. UK

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen J (2004) Ecotoxicological effect assessment and risk characterisation of selected contaminants in sewage sludge. PhD thesis. National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Denmark, p 70. ISBN:87-7834-611-8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Houillon G, Jolliet O (2005) Life cycle assessment of processes for the treatment of wastewater urban sludge: energy and global warming analysis. J Clean Prod 13(3):287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirschbaum MUF (1995) The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biol Biochem 27(6):753–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong J, Hong J, Otaki M, Jolliet O (2009) Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan. Waste Manag 29(2):696–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong J, Chi Y, Tang Y, Wang F, Huang Q (2014) Combined life cycle environmental and exergetic assessment of four typical sewage sludge treatment techniques in China. Energy Fuels 28(3):2114–2122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolna-Maruwka A (2009) Estimation of microbiological status of sewage sludge subject to composting process in controlled conditions. Pol Environ Stud 18(2):279–288

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cyprowski M, Sowiak M, Soroka PM, Buczyrńska A, Kozajda A, Szadkowska-Stańczyk I (2008) Assessment of occupational exposure to fungal aerosols in wastewater treatment plants. Med Pr 59(5):365–371

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ordinance (2004) On the manner of utilization of sludge from wastewater treatment through its use in agriculture. Decree N339, 14 Dec 2004, SG 112, 23 Dec 2004 (in Bulgarian)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siuta J, Wasiak G (2001) Principles of sewage sludges using on unindustrial goals (natural). Inż Ekol 3:13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen Thi BL, Obertynska E (2003) Effect of sewage sludge on some soil microorganisms under mazie cultivation. Zes. Probl Post Nauk Roln 494:305

    Google Scholar 

  17. Popova TP, Petkov YP, Baykov BD (2009) Following of the surviving of pathogenic microorganisms in poultry litter in sequens is bath process of methane fermentation and comparative assessment in relation to the decontamination in other methods of bioprocessing. In: Proceedings of the 14th ISAH congress, International Society for Animal Hygiene, vol 2, 19–23 July 2009, Vechta, Germany, pp 1029–1032

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lind O (1937) Untersuchungen über die bakteriziden Eigenschaften der Milchsäure. Buch-, Verlags- und Akzidenzdruckerei Eduart Seibert, Essigsäure und Salzsäure und ihre Verwendung als Konservierungsmittel für Fleisch Giessen

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goepfert JM, Hicks R (1969) Effect of volatile fatty acids on Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol 97:956–958

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scheinemann HA, Dittmar K, Stöckel FS, Müller H, Krüger ME (2015) Hygienisation and nutrient conservation of sewage sludge or cattle manure by lactic acid fermentation. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0118230. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fidjeland J (2015) Sanitisation of faecal sludge by ammonia. Treatment technology for safe reuse in agriculture. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, p 79

    Google Scholar 

  22. Popova TP, Baykov BD, Shindarska Z (2013) Comparative testing of effect of ammonium phosphates for decontamination of cattle manure. Archiva Zootechnica 16(1):89–97

    Google Scholar 

  23. Popova TP, Baykov BD (2014) Decontamination of sewage sludge by treatment with formaldehyde in vitro. Int J Current Microbiol Appl Sci 3(10):982–989

    Google Scholar 

  24. Popova TP, Marinova-Garvanska SM, Kaleva MD, Zaharinov BS, Gencheva AB, Baykov BD (2014) Decontamination of sewage sludge by treatment with calcium oxide. Int J Current Microbiol Appl Sci 3(9):184–192

    Google Scholar 

  25. Werle S, Wilk RK (2010) A review of methods for the thermal utilization of sewage sludge: the polish perspective. Renew Energy 35(9):1914–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Murakami T, Suzuki Y, Nagasawa H, Yamamoto T, Koseki T, Hirose H, Okamoto S (2009) Combustion characteristics of sewage sludge in an incineration plant for energy recovery. Fuel Process Technol 90(6):778–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hong J, Li X (2011) Environmental assessment of sewage sludge as secondary raw material in cement production—a case study in China. Waste Manag 31(6):1364–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bertanza G, Canato M, Heimersson S, Laera G, Salvetti R, Slavik E, Svanström M (2015) Techno-economic and environmental assessment of sewage sludge wet oxidation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22(10):7327–7338. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3378-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim MH, Kim JW (2010) Comparison through a LCA evaluation analysis of food waste disposal options from the perspective of global warming and resource recovery. Sci Total Environ 408(19):3998–4006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith P (2004) Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context. Eur J Agron 20(3):229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao Y, Lu W, Damgaard A, Zhang Y, Wang H (2015) Assessment of co-composting of sludge and woodchips in the perspective of environmental impacts (EASETECH). Waste Manag 42:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by NSF as a result of the implementation of project FFNIPO-12-01283 “Ecologization of agro-environmental systems and increase energy efficiency by applying a recast bio organic waste for fertilization, introduction of energy crops and complex use of biomass as an energy source (Contract DFNI-E01/3 of 27/11/2012)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teodora P. Popova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Popova, T.P., Zaharinov, B.S., Gentcheva, A., Pejtchinova, M., Marinova-Garvanska, S.M., Baykov, B.D. (2017). Microbiological Assessment of Sewage Sludge in Terms of Use as a Fertilizer. In: Zhang, X., Dincer, I. (eds) Energy Solutions to Combat Global Warming. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26950-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26950-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26948-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26950-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics