Skip to main content

Usability Factors in Transactional Design and Smart Contracting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Law and eTechnologies

Abstract

This book chapter contextualizes the origins of the proactive law movement to explain its current developments and advance its conceptual underpinnings towards applications of the perspective closest to the digital economy and electronic trade with regard to transactions and contracts. It aims at proposing transactional design as an expression of smart contracting practices, explaining its scope within the principled conflict management and dispute resolution collaborative culture. Additionally, standards of efficiency, effectiveness, and satisfaction are taken from within the computer sciences and the law to present an integrated taxonomy of usability parameters for the planning and assessment of sustainable business and other human transactions consigned in electronic texts mediated by technology. It is argued that the applicability of such integrated cross-disciplinary models is ensured given the growing reach and range of digital services and also because their formulation reflects the interconnected society principles, needs, and capacities. While featuring innovative aspects in alternative contracting practices, it refrains from addressing visualization in depth. However, the complexity of engaging with semiotic analysis of visualization techniques in legal interface design is signalled as an especially worthy field for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mediated and mediatized are terms referring to the use of devices as intermediaries between agents/users, and in electronic exchange that fills content online (public or accessible), respectively. Digital, self-enforcing “smart contracts” were proposed by Nick Szabo in 1993, when the economic and communications infrastructure were unfit to support them (Szabo 1997). Technical and economic conditions are now available, but the issue of trust in fully automated services and artificial intelligence is not well resolved yet. Trust is of fundamental importance for the accomplishment of any e-strategy such as e-health, e-finances, e-government, and the expansion of the Internet of Things. Legal systems can easily adapt to smart contracting practices, whereas as for now, smart contracts could impose insurmountable ethical, legal, and safety constraints as they demand a very significant allegiance from the human to automated agents.

  2. 2.

    One could interpret the regulatory or social evolution lag as an opportunity for iteration, revision, and adaptation. If the digital market was to deliver too fast the economic growth it is expected to produce, exhaustion would follow, together with the depletion of all of resources available to maintain social and economic organizations afloat. Mismatch between formal regulations and the so-called slow-moving institutions embedded in social practices and cultures is common.

  3. 3.

    See the study report on Cross-Border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union online at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/imco/dv/adr_study_/adr_study_en.pdf.

  4. 4.

    Solarte-Vasquez (2014).

  5. 5.

    Norta et al. (2015).

  6. 6.

    Collaboration is a human competence, an asset that amounts to social capital; it is necessary to achieve corporate and social missions and determine the sustainability of the organization in itself (long-term operations) and its activities (impact). Social capital is generally understood as the economic value of networks and social cohesion. The concept is much better explained by Portes (2000, p. 45).

  7. 7.

    Read Castells in general and: “The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture,” in particular (Castells 2011); and Fuchs’ contributions in: “Internet and society: Social theory in the information age” (Fuchs 2007).

  8. 8.

    The rules of the analogous world, specially procedural ones, are limited to some extent because they predicate on physicality and jurisdictional borders. The substantial laws on the links between persons and between goods and persons (natural or legal entities but not artificial intelligence agents) are well developed and refined but revolve around one chief goal: the creation of enforceable catalogues of rights and obligations.

  9. 9.

    Conte et al. (2012).

  10. 10.

    Political economy considerations are not legal enunciates or necessarily have to conform with the pure theory of law. Policy makers create exceptions and use other governance strategies but cannot act upon ideological and other priorities by affecting core propositions deriving from the rule of law.

  11. 11.

    -Indigenous- Conflict prevention and resolution mechanisms have been historically in use by every society long before the contemporary methods where introduced. Even more broadly exercised, freedom of contracting has been a practical (rather than moral) principle inspiring constructive action for centuries, as it is intrinsically related to free will that can be put to the service of any purpose.

  12. 12.

    The ombudsman’s role is that of a dispute manager/administrator. Depending on the context and the level of institutionalization of the figure, it can intervene to a different degree. Mediation in criminal matters intends to implement restitution and reconciliation processes from the conflict and peace studies in the criminal system. See Lahti (2000).

  13. 13.

    Consult, for instance, the latest EU Initiatives on ADR and online dispute resolution (ODR) and related documents regarding consumer disputes at: http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/solving_consumer_disputes/non-judicial_redress/adr-odr/index_en.htm#related_documents, and the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on The proactive law approach from 2009 available online at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52008IE1905&from=EN.

  14. 14.

    Groton and Haapio (2007). Proactive law has grown from its therapeutic beginnings into a philosophy for better private and public regulations and still can be placed into a conflict management and dispute prevention continuum.

  15. 15.

    The proactive proposal spoke of legal knowledge as a competitive advantage although the result of an associative work during the planning stages of commercial contractual relationships. See infra, notes 22 and 46 and Rekola and Haapio (2011).

  16. 16.

    Pohjonen (2010), among other publications of the same author, provides an excellent explanation on the origins and fundamentals of the proactive law movement with implications on her research in the field of collaborative contracts.

  17. 17.

    The humanist life stance trusts the cognitive and emotional capacities of the human being to preserve views in which the human dignity, interests, and values predominate and to solve their problems with epistemological (rational in the sense of systematic) proficiency. It is liberal in that it endorses autonomy and promotes self-determination.

  18. 18.

    On the original proposal on the preventive law practice, read Brown (1951); on proactive law as first conceived, read Siedel and Haapio (2010); on ADR, find distinguishable stands in Barrett and Barrett (2004), Schneider (1999), Henry (2000), and Lieberman and Henry (1986) and an overview in Sander (1985). Daicoff (2005) speaks of a comprehensive law practice. An interest study by Jasperson et al. (2002) reviews power, one of the main elements in conflict studies and its relationship with technology, and on general conflict and peace studies read “The Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies,” edited by Webel and Galtung (2007).

  19. 19.

    Menkel-Meadow (1985).

  20. 20.

    Stolle and Wexler (1997).

  21. 21.

    Brown (1951, 1956).

  22. 22.

    For a complete overview, consult Burton (1985), and Burton and Sandole (1987).

  23. 23.

    On the past and future of proactive law, read, for instance, Berger-Walliser (2012).

  24. 24.

    The literature on conflict management and resolution is vast, discussing expressions that were commonplace already in the 1970s, each referring to different frameworks, skills, and interests on the administration of disputes and heuristics to lessen the damaging impact of crisis. Any expression could be said to fall short of the possible applications of the understanding of conflict as a phenomenon, inherent to human association and a recognized catalyst of change as Galtung (1996) has explained. Most descriptions fail to explicitly include a preventive dimension. However, any functional approach can become useful to designate the many possible interventions that in different moments could be aiming at various effects as conflicts may long remain latent or extend over long periods of time.

  25. 25.

    Rekola and Haapio (2011).

  26. 26.

    On articulation of new languages, see Ramadier (2004). The proactive movement has opened the space for interdisciplinary research and intellectual engagement by working very hard on terminological choices, resorting to metaphoric arguments and the careful articulation of shared renewed meanings.

  27. 27.

    Domestic legal systems, statutes, codes, or legal acts define terms such as transactions, obligations, and contracts.

  28. 28.

    In communication theory, text can be content or outcome of an interaction, no matter what format. Consult the Encyclopaedia of communication theory (Vol. 1), p. 148.

  29. 29.

    In texts with augmented reality (the indirect view of a real world environment, like a sound and a shape, superposed on images for a composited view of displays), textured contracts (in layers), and so on.

  30. 30.

    Verganti (2011). On ethics and sustainability of design see: Felton, Zelenko, Vaughan (Eds.) (2013).

  31. 31.

    Macneil and Gudel (2001).

  32. 32.

    Haapio presents the principled negotiation essentials in her publication with Groton, ibid. 30. Further references are available at the source of the Harvard Negotiation Project at: http://www.pon.harvard.edu/category/research_projects/harvard-negotiation-project/.

  33. 33.

    Valid contracts submit to the requirements of the law as the civil theory of contracts summarizes at least the existence of elements of a contract, namely licit object and cause, capacity, formalities, and the meeting of the minds. These elements coincide in all civil codes of the civil law tradition. More on the Roman Tradition of contract formation in Cohen (1933) and Ghirardi and Crespo (1996).

  34. 34.

    On the role of formal and informal, legislative and nonlegislative measures to strengthen the culture of ADR within the EU and a discussion on ADR as an empowering self-regulatory solutions contributing to the success of cross-border and electronic trade, read further in Solarte-Vasquez (2014).

  35. 35.

    See Teubner (1983) on reflexive law.

  36. 36.

    “Better Regulation” means, within the EU, good design of measures, formal and informal, that can be effective. More rules do not mean better regulatory environment but might mean the opposite. Consult more at: http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/better_regulation/key_docs_en.htm REFIT (the European Commission’s Regulatory Fitness and Performance programme) takes action to simplify the laws and reduce regulatory costs and is part of the EU governance innovation actions.

  37. 37.

    Consult the EU directory/database on consumer legislation at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/summary/chapter/consumers.html?root_default=SUM_1_CODED%3D09.

  38. 38.

    The report and data source can be read in the European Commission ICT survey of Households and Individuals report of 2014. At http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Information_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals.

  39. 39.

    The importance of this proposal on smart contracting and better transactions transcends economic considerations. Transactional design that could result in an improved contractual experience prevents disputes and reduces social and institutional tensions. For an introduction on the different costs of conflicts, disputes, and litigation in general, find: “Economic analysis of legal disputes and their resolution” by Cooter and Rubinfeld (1989), and “The intersection of therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and alternative dispute resolution” by Schneider (1999).

  40. 40.

    Principled negotiation is the name assigned to the method developed by Fisher, Ury, and Patton and popularized in their book of tactics Getting to Yes and developed under the auspices of the Harvard Law School. See a recent application of the perspective in Lens (2004). A complete explanation on human-centered design principles is available by Norman (1883) and discussed in Norman (2005).

  41. 41.

    Clarity and consistency of regulatory frameworks are requirements of predictable legal systems, owing to the observations of the rule of law principles (strongly committed to rule out arbitrary decision making and interpretation). Graphics and visual elements that are not conventions cannot be interpreted with certainty.

  42. 42.

    Reimann and Kay (2010). Research and knowledge on mediated trust and persuasive technologies from the legal perspective are still insufficient. For an introductory reflection on the impact of visual technologies in the law, read Sherwin (2011).

  43. 43.

    Forshey (1978); Kimble (1996); and Phelps (1986). Look also into a psychological perspective in: Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts: Effectiveness of plain language redrafting by Masson and Waldron (1994).

  44. 44.

    Siedel and Haapio (2010a); Haapio (2010); and, Passera and Haapio (2011a, b).

  45. 45.

    Passera and Haapio (2011b). See also Berger-Walliser et al. (2011).

  46. 46.

    Passera et al. (2013a, b).

  47. 47.

    For instance, in the ongoing Fimecc UXUS and completed PRO2ACT – projects. More information on these is available in their webpages: http://www.mindspace.fi/en/uxus/ and http://tuta.aalto.fi/en/research/operations_and_service_management/simlab/projects/pro2act/in_finnish/, respectively.

  48. 48.

    Text in here is any message on any medium which includes imagery, film, pictures, words, and sound. Various interfaces can be designed to increment choices, for instance creating different layers and textures, as well as modules for selecting and mixing. On modularity, find: Smith (2006).

  49. 49.

    Persuasive technologies are designed to modify human attitudes and conducts. Read more in Fogg (2002).

  50. 50.

    That contracts are created for information and persuasion is assumed in this section, but only the cognitive enhancement is being discussed. Another important assumption is that in simplifying a legal text, adding more than what seeks to inform and persuade would be superfluous and add noise to the text.

  51. 51.

    Nielsen (1994).

  52. 52.

    About the Harvard negotiation project find more at: http://www.pon.harvard.edu/category/research_projects/harvard-negotiation-project/.

  53. 53.

    The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) have issued numerous materials that can be the reference for the development of usable products. Search on the database: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_ics and refer in particular to ISO 9241. On a categorization of usability standards and a brief discussion on their applicability problems, consult Bevan (2006).

  54. 54.

    Pearrow (2006) and Brinck et al. (2002).

  55. 55.

    Language is believed to be the main cause of contractual inefficiencies, particularly in consumer protection advocacy circles where the plain language movement is rooted. “Plain” when applied to a written document could be understood in three ways: the text is legible, meaning that it can be perceived and then read; it has unity, that is coherency and consistency in all language arrangements; and it is clear, meaning intelligible and with semantic precision. These three main characteristics determine the degree to which readers can comprehend text. On lean contracting, read Siedel and Haapio (2010), p. 26.

  56. 56.

    Looking at the whole relational context (Braucher 1990), contracts acquire a new meaning. Braucher speaks of the dangers of contractarianism and recommends more sustainable and productive contractual relations not to sacrifice factors such as fairness and sense of community.

  57. 57.

    Criteria for effective contract drafting combine linguistic technical skills with being able to identify the building blocks of a relationship and producing a strategic document for compliance, as well as a positive transactional experience. The same, one could argue, applies to other types of text consigning the creations of rights and duties. Criteria for good regulation have always been discussed in the literature; see, for instance, on boiler plate and standardized formats Stark (2003); Hillman and Rachlinski (2002) about standard-form electronic contracting; Tan and Thoen (2003) on a risk/trust model for preparing the contract; and the concept on contract as a technology explained by Davis (2013), among the many authors with similar concerns. Some initiatives of a much wider range have derived from the plain language movement that in the 1970s is consumer protection activism inspired; find, for example, in www.plainlanguagenetwork.org and in www.clarity-international.net for more resources. Some of the traditional principles combined with the selection of usability parameters in this chapter compose a practical checklist to be used in transactional design.

  58. 58.

    As if coinciding with Susskind on his assessments about today’s legal landscape and his predictions about the future of legal services (Susskind 2008), the proposals by Passera and Haapio (2011a, b) unpack the possibilities of at least three of the categories that Susskind describes: the legal “knowledge engineer,” the legal “risk manager,” and the legal “hybrid.” (Susskind 2008, pp. 272–273).

  59. 59.

    This argument becomes especially relevant in the case of Passera’s work, which uses boundary object theory in her contracting enhancement proposal (2012). An “easy” way to skip the complex conceptual articulation phase when attempting these classifications could be to leave conflict theory and proactive and collaborative principles aside and concentrate on the fact that the illustration of transactions is preventive and promotive enough, requiring no evaluation on their own.

  60. 60.

    The field of usability is replete with advice on characteristics that can be categorized (read, for example, in Lidwell et al. (2010)), but few are the principles that sufficiently guide a proper research design to improve the interaction experience such as the focus on user needs, choosing an experimental approach, and design thinking engineering tools. In this section, the usability factors included in the taxonomy can be said to be the basic and most widely applicable in the practice of usability testing as for now.

  61. 61.

    Traffic signs and logos of the creative commons are some of the very few (search them on http://creativecommons.org/).

  62. 62.

    Look at an experimental evaluation report in Passera (2012).

  63. 63.

    Precision and recall are characteristics that are commonplace in information visualization and data representation in regard to information retrieval to indicate correctness and completeness. They could also apply to semantics, but the tensions between the degree of exactitude needed and the benefits of clarity in HCI and plain language in transactional design could detriment communication and raise more questions about the visualization of concepts. Whether the need for metrics in visual information analysis would be applicable to the visualization of the law cannot be ascertained in these few pages.

  64. 64.

    For a review of this feature in context, read Ziefle (2002).

  65. 65.

    Data-ink is the nonerasable ink. If removed from the image, the graphic would lose the content. Non-Data-Ink is, accordingly, the ink that does not transport necessary information but creates noise Tufte and Graves-Morris (1983).

  66. 66.

    Introduction to Human Factors Engineering by Wickens et al. (1998), and Interaction Design-beyond human–computer interaction by Preece et al. (2015) are recommended texts on research methods in HCI.

  67. 67.

    Read further in Hillman and Rachlinski (2002).

References

  • Barrett JT, Barrett J (2004) A history of alternative dispute resolution: the story of a political, social, and cultural movement. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger-Walliser G (2012) The past and future of proactive law: an overview of the development of the proactive law movement. In: Berger-Walliser G, Østergaard K (eds) Proactive law in a business environment. DJØF Publishing, pp 13–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger-Walliser G, Bird RC, Haapio H (2011) Promoting business success through contract visualization. J Bus Ethics 17:55

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan N (2006). International standards for HCI. Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, p 362

    Google Scholar 

  • Braucher J (1990) Contract versus contractarianism: the regulatory role of contract law. Wash Lee Law Rev 47:697

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinck T, Gergle D, Wood SD (2002) Designing Web sites that work: usability for the Web. Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LM (1951) Practice of preventive law. J Am Jud Soc 35:45

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LM (1956) The law office. A preventive law laboratory. Univ Pa Law Rev 940–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton JW (1985) The history of international conflict resolution. Int Interact 12(1):45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton JW, Sandole DJ (1987) Expanding the debate on generic theory of conflict resolution: a response to a critique. Negot J 3(1):97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2011) The rise of the network society: the information age: economy, society, and culture, vol 1. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MR (1933) The basis of contract. Harv Law Rev 553–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte R, Gilbert N, Bonelli G, Cioffi-Revilla C, Deffuant G, Kertesz J, … Helbing D (2012) Manifesto of computational social science. Eur Phys J Spec Top 214(1):325–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter RD, Rubinfeld DL (1989) Economic analysis of legal disputes and their resolution. J Econ Lit 1067–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Daicoff SS (2005) Law as a healing profession: the comprehensive law movement. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law J, Fall, 06-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis KE (2013) Contracts as technology. NYUL Rev 88:83

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogg BJ (2002) Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity, 2002(December), 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Forshey JR (1978) Plain English Contracts: the Demise of Legalese. Baylor Law Rev 30:765

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs C (2007) Internet and society: social theory in the information age. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung J (1996) Peace by peaceful means: peace and conflict, development and civilization, vol 14. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardi JC, Crespo JJA (1996) Derecho romano. Eudecor

    Google Scholar 

  • Groton J, Haapio H (2007, October) From reaction to proactive action: dispute prevention processes in business agreements. In: IACCM EMEA Academic Symposium, London, vol 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapio H (2010) Business success and problem prevention through proactive contracting. Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry JF (2000) Some reflections on ADR. J Disp Resol 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman RA, Rachlinski JJ (2002) Standard-form contracting in the electronic age. NYUL Rev 77:429

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasperson JS, Carte TA, Saunders CS, Butler BS, Croes HJ, Zheng W (2002) Review: power and information technology research: a metatriangulation review. MIS Q 26(4):397–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble J (1996) Writing for dollars, writing to please. Scribes J Leg Writ 6:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti R (2000) Towards a rational and humane criminal policy? Trends in Scandinavian penal thinking. J Scand Stud Criminol Crime Prev 1(2):141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidwell W, Holden K, Butler J (2010) Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Pub

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman JK, Henry JF (1986) Lessons from the alternative dispute resolution movement. Univ Chicago Law Rev 424–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil IR, Gudel PJ (2001) Contracts: exchange transactions and relations: cases and materials. Foundation Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson ME, Waldron MA (1994) Comprehension of legal contracts by non-experts: effectiveness of plain language redrafting. Appl Cogn Psychol 8(1):67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menkel-Meadow C (1985) Transformation of disputes by lawyers: what the dispute paradigm does and does not tell us. Mo J Disp Resol 25

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J (1994) Usability engineering. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Norta A, Dua Y, Ma L, Rull A, Kolvart M, Taveter K (2015) eContractual choreography-language properties towards cross-organizational business collaboration. J Internet Serv Appl 6(8):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Passera S (2012, July) Enhancing contract usability and user experience through visualization-an experimental evaluation. In: 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV). IEEE, pp 376–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Passera S, Haapio H (2011a) Facilitating collaboration through contract visualization and modularization. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. ACM, pp 57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Passera S, Haapio H (2011b) User-centered contract design: new directions in the quest for simpler contracting. In: Bringing together academics and practitioners to promote research and best practice in Contracts and Commercial Management, Academic Forum for Innovative Research and Practice, International Association for Contract and Commercial Management (IACCM), Ridgefield, pp 80–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Passera S, Pohjonen S, Koskelainen K, Anttila S (2013a) User-friendly contracting tools–a visual guide to facilitate public procurement contracting. In: Proceedings of the IACCM Academic Forum

    Google Scholar 

  • Passera S, Haapio H, Barton TD (2013b) Innovating contract practices: merging contract design with information design

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearrow M (2006) Web site usability handbook (internet series). Charles River Media, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps TG (1986) New legal rhetoric. SW Law J 40:1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohjonen S (2010) Proactive law in the field of law. In: Wahlgren P (ed) A proactive approach, Scandinavian studies in law, vol 49. Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp 53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes A (2000) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. In: Lesser EL (ed) Knowledge and social capital. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 43–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Preece J, Sharp H, Rogers Y (2015) Interaction design-beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramadier T (2004) Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies. Futures 36(4):423–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimann P, Kay J (2010) Learning to learn and work in net-based teams: supporting emergent collaboration with visualization tools. Designs for learning environment of the future. New York: Springer, pp 143–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekola K, Haapio H (2011) Proactive contracting+ service design= success! Int J Serv Econ Manage 3(4):376–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander FE (1985) Alternative methods of dispute resolution: an overview. Univ Fla Law Rev 37:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider AK (1999) The intersection of therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and alternative dispute resolution. Psychol Public Policy Law 5(4):1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin RK (2011) Visualizing law in the age of the digital baroque: Arabesques and entanglements. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Siedel G, Haapio H (2010) Proactive law for managers. A hidden source of competitive advantage. Gower

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HE (2006) Modularity in contracts: boilerplate and information flow. Mich Law Rev 1175–1222

    Google Scholar 

  • Solarte-Vasquez MC (2014) Reflections on the concrete application of principles of internet governance and the networked information society in the European Union institutionalization process of Alternative Dispute Resolution methods. Tanel kerikmäe (Toim.). Regulating eTechnologies in the European Union. Springer Verlag, 251–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark TL (2003) Negotiating and drafting contract boilerplate. ALM Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle DP, Wexler DB (1997) Therapeutic jurisprudence and preventive law: a combined concentration to invigorate the everyday practice of law. Ariz Law Rev 39:25

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind R (2008) The end of lawyers. Rethink Nat Leg Serv 32:50

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo N (1997) Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday 2(9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan YH, Thoen W (2003) Electronic contract drafting based on risk and trust assessment. Int J Electron Commer 7(4):55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner G (1983) Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law Soc Rev 239–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte ER, Graves-Morris PR (1983) The visual display of quantitative information, vol 2, no 9. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey MT (1992) Affordances and prospective control: an outline of the ontology. Ecol Psychol 4(3):173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verganti R (2011) Designing breakthrough products. Harv Bus Rev

    Google Scholar 

  • Webel C, Galtung J (eds) (2007) Handbook of peace and conflict studies. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, Lee JD, Liu Y, Gordon-Becker S (1998) Introduction to human factors engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziefle M (2002) The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones. Behav Inf Technol 21(5):303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Claudia Solarte-Vasquez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solarte-Vasquez, M.C., Järv, N., Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2016). Usability Factors in Transactional Design and Smart Contracting. In: Kerikmäe, T., Rull, A. (eds) The Future of Law and eTechnologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26894-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26896-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics