Abstract
This study analyzes six American voluntary agreements for university sustainability, demonstrating that the individual agreement networks intersect to form a larger network for sustainable low-carbon transitions. Drawing on a framework of social and institutional learning, the study uses network and positional analysis methods to map the cognitive practice of universities engaged in voluntary sustainability commitment. These agreements scaffold learning structures for member universities, providing support in the search for solutions to sustainable transitions. Within these structures, universities experiment and learn as they construct new norms for institutions. Through their participation, universities join a network of shared practice and beliefs. By participating in several of these networks, institutions are connected to many new ideas and practices. These overlapping memberships link together, making a network of networks. By choosing to participate in any or all of these agreements, universities have chosen to enter into a dialogue about and practice of sustainable transition, where learning, experience and expertise intersect. The universities participating in these voluntary sustainability agreements are forming a network of committed practitioners supported by policies and an emerging cognitive practice with the ability, capacity and commitment to significantly address the critical problem of climate change.
References
Adlong W (2013) Rethinking the talloires declaration. Int J Sustain High Educ 14(1):56–70
American College and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCCa) (2013) Program overview. Retrieved from http://www2.presidentsclimatecommitment.org/pdf/program_overview.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2013
American College and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment Reporting System (ACUPCCb) (2013)ACUPCC reporting institutions. Retrieved from http://rs.acupcc.org/. Accessed 30 Oct 2013
American College and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCCd) (2012) Implementation guide version 2.1. Acessed 30 Oct 2013
Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHEa) (2012) About AASHE. http://www.aashe.org/about. Accessed 30 Oct 2013
Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHEb) (2012). The STARS program. Retrieved from http://www.aashe.org/files/documents/STARS/stars_overview.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2013
Barth M (2013) Many roads lead to sustainability: a process-oriented analysis of change in higher education. Int Sustain High Educ 14(2):160–175. doi:10.1108/14676371311312879
Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Presented at international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media
Bilodeau L, Podger J, Abd-El-Aziz A (2014) Advancing campus and community sustainability: strategic alliances in action. Int J Sustain High Educ 15(2):157–168. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-06-2012-0051
Borgatti S, Everett M, Johnson J (2013) Analyzing social networks. Sage Publications, London
Calder W, Dautremont Smith J (2009) Higher education: more and more laboratories for inventing a sustainable future. In: Dernbach JC (ed) Agenda for a sustainable America. Environmental Law Institute
Clarke AE (2005) Situational analysis: grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Diani M, McAdam D (2003) Social movements and networks: relational approaches to collective action. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Environmental Association for Universities and Colleges (2014) http://www.eauc.org.uk/home. Accessed 12 Aug 2014
Eyerman R, Jamison A (1996) Social movements: a cognitive approach, 2nd edn. Pennsylvania State University Press, State College, PA
Garson D (2012) Network analysis. Statistical Publishing Associates, Ashboro, NC
Hall P, McGinty P (2002) Social organization across space and time: the policy process, mesodomain analysis, and the breadth of perspective. Structure, culture, and history: recent issues in social theory. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, Boulder, CO, pp 303–322
Hanneman RA, Mark R (2005) Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside, CA. Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/)
Jacobssen S, Bergek A (2011) Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: contributions and suggestions for research. Environ Innovations Societal Trans 1:41–51
Kadushin C (2012) Understanding social networks: theories, concepts and findings. Oxford University Press, New York
Kasemir B (2013) Strategic planning for the ISCN: members’ summit. Zurich: sustainserv
Kilgore D (1999) Understanding learning in social movements: a theory of collective learning. Int J Lifelong Educ 18(3):191–202. doi:10.1080/026013799293784
Knight L, Pye A (2005) Network learning: an empirically derived model of learning by groups of organizations. Hum Relat 58(3):362–392
Kraatz M (1998) Learning by association: interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Acad Manage J 41(6):621–643
Laffitte LB (2010) Sustainability in higher education: how does the process of campus greening trigger adaptive social learning? (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from North Carolina State University, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing
Manring S (2007) Creating and managing interorganizational learning networks to achieve sustainable ecosystem management. Organ Environ 20:325. doi:10.1177/1086026607305738
Mariotti F (2012) Exploring interorganizational learning: a review of the literature and future directions. Knowl Process Manage 19(4):215–221. doi:10.1002/kpm.1395
McLaughlin P (2011) Climate change, adaptation, and vulnerability: reconceptualizing social-environment interaction within a socially-constructed landscape (2011) Organ Environ 24(3):269–291. doi:10.1177/1086026611419862
Mohrman S, Docherty P, Shani A, Schenkel A Teigland R (2005) The development of new organizational capacities. Center for Effective Organizations—Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
Popper M, Lipschitz R (2000) Organizational learning mechanisms, culture, and feasibility. Manage Learn 31:181. doi:10.1177/1350507600312003
Scholz J, Berardo R, Kile B (2008) Do networks solve collective action problems? Credibility, search and collaboration. J Polit 70:393–406
Second Nature (2012) The American college and university presidents’ climate commitment 2012 report. http://www.presidentsclimatecommittment.org. Accessed 9 Sept 2013
Seyfang G, Haxeltine A (2011) Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 30(3):381–400. doi:10.1068/c10222
Shriberg M (2002) Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: strengths, weaknesses, and implications for practice and theory. High Educ Policy 15:153–167
TPR Education IP Holdings (2013) The Princeton review’s guide to 322 green colleges, 2013 Ed. Washington DC
University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (1990) Report and declaration of the presidents conference. http://www.ulsf.org/programs_talloires_report.html
United Nations Environment Programme (2014) http://www.unep.org/training/programmes/gupes.asp. Accessed 30 Oct 2013
Vezzoli C, Penin L (2006) Campus: “lab” and “window” for sustainable design research and education: the DECOS educational network experience. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(1):69–80
Vygotsky L (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Walton J (2013) Salaries and status of sustainability staff in higher education: results of AASHE’s 2012 higher education sustainability staffing survey. Association for the advancement of sustainability in higher education. http://www.aashe.org/files/documents/programs/2012_staffsurvey-final.pdf. Accessed 29 Sept 2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Whitney, M.K. (2016). Declarations and Commitments: The Cognitive Practice of Sustainability Agreements. In: Leal Filho, W., Zint, M. (eds) The Contribution of Social Sciences to Sustainable Development at Universities. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26866-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26866-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26864-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26866-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)