Abstract
At present, there are no globally applicable fatality rates used in loss estimation models and within the research of earthquake casualties, there is certainly a lack of comprehensive data collection in the field following actual events. As the population living in areas exposed to seismic activity continues to increase and settlements are located in more hazardous areas, it is vital that engineers understand the implications of these social changes and use tools available to them to inform decision makers and response teams to mitigate and react to situations of mass earthquake casualties. In Marano et al.’s (Nat Hazards, 49, 2009) assessment of earthquake deaths in the period September 1968 to June 2008, they concluded that 77.7 % of the total earthquake deaths were due to ground shaking-related building damage; if we consider the official death toll of 316,000 for the Haiti earthquake of 2010 (though this figure is much disputed), this would increase the contribution from building damage to over 80 %. The main cause of deaths and injuries, as suggested by previous studies (Coburn and Spence, Earthquake protection 2002; Marano et al. Nat Hazards, 49, 2009) are due to damage and especially due to collapse of buildings. Therefore only in understanding the associations between the levels of damage and the severity and types of injuries can one make headway in deriving realistic estimates of human casualties in future earthquakes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bilham R (2009) The seismic future of cities. Bull Earthq Eng 7(4):839–887
Coburn AW, Spence RJS (2002) Earthquake protection, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, p 436
Kreemer C, Holt WE, Haines AJ (2003) An integrated global model of present-day plate motions and plate boundary deformation. Geophys J Int 154(1):8–34
Marano KD, Wald DJ, Allen TI (2009) Global earthquake casualties due to secondary effects: a quantitative analysis for improving rapid loss analyses. Nat Hazards 49. 10.1007/s11069-009-9372-5
NIBS-FEMA (National Institute of Building Sciences-Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2006) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, HAZUS-MH MR2 technical manual, prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, United States, pp 727
Spence RJS (2007) Saving lives in earthquakes: successes and failures in seismic protection since 1960. Bull Earthq Eng 5(2):139–251
Spence R, So E, Jenny S, Castella H, Ewald M, Booth E (2008) The Global Earthquake Vulnerability Estimation System (GEVES): an approach for earthquake risk assessment for insurance applications. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):463–483
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
So, E. (2016). Introduction. In: Estimating Fatality Rates for Earthquake Loss Models. SpringerBriefs in Earth Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26838-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26838-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26837-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26838-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)