Abstract
While accountability is increasingly discussed as a privacy principle, it is far from clear how to achieve privacy protection through accountability. Moreover, it is even unclear how to define accountability in this context. This paper provides a conceptualization of accountability for the context of privacy protection based upon a review of the literature. The presented literature review aims at identifying a minimal core of accountability for the context of privacy protection to provide a foundation for requirements analysis for accountability-centric privacy protection mechanisms.
References
McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E.: Big data: the management revolution. Harv. Bus. Rev. 90(10), 60–68 (2012)
OECD: OECD guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data (1980)
OECD: The 2013 OECD Privacy Guidelines (2013)
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party: Opinion 3/2010 on the principle of accountability (2010)
Madrid Resolution: International Standards on the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy (2009)
Koppell, J.G.: Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of multiple accountabilities disorder. Publ. Adm. Rev. 65(1), 94–108 (2005)
Raab, C.: The meaning of ‘accountability’ in the information privacy context. In: Managing Privacy Through Accountability, pp. 15–32. Palgrave Macmillan (2012)
Müller, G., Flender, C., Peters, M.: Vertrauensinfrastruktur und Privatheit als konomische Fragestellung. Internet Privacy: Eine Multidisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme/A Multidisciplinary Analysis. acatech Studie, pp. 143–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Mulgan, R.: Accountability: an ever-expanding concept. Publ. Adm. 78(3), 555–573 (2000)
Bovens, M.A.P.: Public accountability. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, pp. 182–208 (2005)
Greiling, D., Spraul, K.: Accountability and the challenges of information disclosure. Publ. Adm. Q. 34(3), 338–377 (2010)
Jaatun, M.G., Pearson, S., Gittler, F., Leenes, R.: Towards strong accountability for cloud service providers. In: Proceedings of the CloudCom, pp. 1001–1006. IEEE (2014)
Nuñez, D., Fernandez-Gago, C., Agudo, I., Pannetrat, A., Luna, J., Berthold, S., Pearson, S., Felici, M., Cayirci, E., TaheriMonfared, A., Chakravorty, A., Wlodarczyk, T.W.: D:C-5.1 Metrics for Accountability. Project Deliverable D35.1, Cloud Accountability Project (2013)
Bennett, C.J.: The accountability approach to privacy and data protection: assumptions and caveats. In: Managing Privacy Through Accountability, pp. 33–48. Palgrave Macmillan (2012)
Bovens, M.: Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. Eur. Law J. 13(4), 447–468 (2007)
Dubnick, M.: Accountability and the promise of performance: in search of the mechanisms. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 28(3), 376–417 (2005)
Feigenbaum, J., Jaggard, A.D., Wright, R.N.: Towards a formal model of accountability. In: Proceedings of the NSPW 2011, pp. 45–56. ACM (2011)
Grant, R.W., Keohane, R.O.: Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 99(1), 29–43 (2005)
Lupia, A.: Delegation and its perils. In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative Politics, pp. 33–54. Oxford University Press (2003)
Pearson, S., Charlesworth, A.: Accountability as a way forward for privacy protection in the cloud. In: Jaatun, M.G., Zhao, G., Rong, C. (eds.) Cloud Computing. LNCS, vol. 5931, pp. 131–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Rubenstein, J.: Accountability in an unequal world. J. Politics 69(3), 616–632 (2007)
Schedler, A.: Conceptualizing accountability. In: Schedler, A., Diamond, L.J., Plattner, M.F. (eds.) The Self-restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, pp. 13–28. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder (1999)
Strom, K.: Parliamentary democracy and delegation. In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative Politics, pp. 55–106. Oxford University Press (2003)
Weitzner, D.J., Abelson, H., Berners-Lee, T., Hanson, C., Hendler, J., Kagal, L., McGuinness, D.L., Sussman, G.J., Waterman, K.K.: Transparent accountable data mining: New strategies for privacy protection. Technical Report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-007, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (2006)
Westin, A.: Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum, New York (1967)
Commission, E.: Directive 95/46/EC of the european parliament and of the council of 24th october 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Off. J. Eur. Commun. L281(38), 31–50 (1995)
Westin, A.: Social and political dimensions of privacy. J. Soc. Issues 59(2), 431–453 (2003)
Accorsi, R., Zimmermann, C., Müller, G.: On taming the inference threat in social networks. In: 1st International Workshop on Privacy and Data Protection Technology (PDPT), Amsterdam (2012)
Pennacchiotti, M., Popescu, A.M.: Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter. In: Proceedings of the SIGKDD 2011, pp. 430–438. ACM (2011)
Schermer, B.W.: The limits of privacy in automated profiling and data mining. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 27(1), 45–52 (2011)
Zimmermann, C., Accorsi, R., Müller, G.: Privacy dashboards: reconciling data-driven business models and privacy. In: Proceedings of the ARES 2014, pp. 152–157. IEEE (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zimmermann, C., Cabinakova, J. (2015). A Conceptualization of Accountability as a Privacy Principle. In: Abramowicz, W. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 228. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26762-3_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26762-3_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26761-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26762-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)