Skip to main content

A Conceptualization of Accountability as a Privacy Principle

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Information Systems Workshops (BIS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 228))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

While accountability is increasingly discussed as a privacy principle, it is far from clear how to achieve privacy protection through accountability. Moreover, it is even unclear how to define accountability in this context. This paper provides a conceptualization of accountability for the context of privacy protection based upon a review of the literature. The presented literature review aims at identifying a minimal core of accountability for the context of privacy protection to provide a foundation for requirements analysis for accountability-centric privacy protection mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E.: Big data: the management revolution. Harv. Bus. Rev. 90(10), 60–68 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. OECD: OECD guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  3. OECD: The 2013 OECD Privacy Guidelines (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party: Opinion 3/2010 on the principle of accountability (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Madrid Resolution: International Standards on the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koppell, J.G.: Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of multiple accountabilities disorder. Publ. Adm. Rev. 65(1), 94–108 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raab, C.: The meaning of ‘accountability’ in the information privacy context. In: Managing Privacy Through Accountability, pp. 15–32. Palgrave Macmillan (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Müller, G., Flender, C., Peters, M.: Vertrauensinfrastruktur und Privatheit als konomische Fragestellung. Internet Privacy: Eine Multidisziplinäre Bestandsaufnahme/A Multidisciplinary Analysis. acatech Studie, pp. 143–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Mulgan, R.: Accountability: an ever-expanding concept. Publ. Adm. 78(3), 555–573 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bovens, M.A.P.: Public accountability. In: The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, pp. 182–208 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greiling, D., Spraul, K.: Accountability and the challenges of information disclosure. Publ. Adm. Q. 34(3), 338–377 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jaatun, M.G., Pearson, S., Gittler, F., Leenes, R.: Towards strong accountability for cloud service providers. In: Proceedings of the CloudCom, pp. 1001–1006. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nuñez, D., Fernandez-Gago, C., Agudo, I., Pannetrat, A., Luna, J., Berthold, S., Pearson, S., Felici, M., Cayirci, E., TaheriMonfared, A., Chakravorty, A., Wlodarczyk, T.W.: D:C-5.1 Metrics for Accountability. Project Deliverable D35.1, Cloud Accountability Project (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett, C.J.: The accountability approach to privacy and data protection: assumptions and caveats. In: Managing Privacy Through Accountability, pp. 33–48. Palgrave Macmillan (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bovens, M.: Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. Eur. Law J. 13(4), 447–468 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubnick, M.: Accountability and the promise of performance: in search of the mechanisms. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 28(3), 376–417 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feigenbaum, J., Jaggard, A.D., Wright, R.N.: Towards a formal model of accountability. In: Proceedings of the NSPW 2011, pp. 45–56. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grant, R.W., Keohane, R.O.: Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 99(1), 29–43 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lupia, A.: Delegation and its perils. In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative Politics, pp. 33–54. Oxford University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pearson, S., Charlesworth, A.: Accountability as a way forward for privacy protection in the cloud. In: Jaatun, M.G., Zhao, G., Rong, C. (eds.) Cloud Computing. LNCS, vol. 5931, pp. 131–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubenstein, J.: Accountability in an unequal world. J. Politics 69(3), 616–632 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schedler, A.: Conceptualizing accountability. In: Schedler, A., Diamond, L.J., Plattner, M.F. (eds.) The Self-restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, pp. 13–28. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Strom, K.: Parliamentary democracy and delegation. In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative Politics, pp. 55–106. Oxford University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weitzner, D.J., Abelson, H., Berners-Lee, T., Hanson, C., Hendler, J., Kagal, L., McGuinness, D.L., Sussman, G.J., Waterman, K.K.: Transparent accountable data mining: New strategies for privacy protection. Technical Report MIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-007, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Westin, A.: Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Commission, E.: Directive 95/46/EC of the european parliament and of the council of 24th october 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Off. J. Eur. Commun. L281(38), 31–50 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Westin, A.: Social and political dimensions of privacy. J. Soc. Issues 59(2), 431–453 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Accorsi, R., Zimmermann, C., Müller, G.: On taming the inference threat in social networks. In: 1st International Workshop on Privacy and Data Protection Technology (PDPT), Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pennacchiotti, M., Popescu, A.M.: Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter. In: Proceedings of the SIGKDD 2011, pp. 430–438. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schermer, B.W.: The limits of privacy in automated profiling and data mining. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 27(1), 45–52 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zimmermann, C., Accorsi, R., Müller, G.: Privacy dashboards: reconciling data-driven business models and privacy. In: Proceedings of the ARES 2014, pp. 152–157. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Zimmermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zimmermann, C., Cabinakova, J. (2015). A Conceptualization of Accountability as a Privacy Principle. In: Abramowicz, W. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 228. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26762-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26762-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26761-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26762-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics