Skip to main content

Motivation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 491 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy ((BRIEFSPHILOSOPH))

Abstract

In this chapter the concept of motivation is interpreted using the unifying formalism. Different concepts of motivation in Husserl are distinguished. Changes in the “strength” of motivations are interpreted in terms of the learning rule of Chap. 3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thus the motivation relation is similar to a kind of conditional probability: if I experience x and take certain actions, then y feels like it should be the natural outcome. However, Husserl is at pains to deny this in one sense: “to talk of an indication is not to presuppose a definite relation to considerations of probability” (LI 1, p. 186). I take him to mean that motivation relations do not imply actual awareness of probabilities, i.e. the kinds of explicit or “active” probability calculations one considers when gambling, solving math problems involving probabilities, or making certain kinds of decision. Motivations are always occurring; we only rarely think explicitly about probabilities.

  2. 2.

    There are other distinctions here as well. Husserl distinguishes noetic and noematic motivation: noetically, my perception of the front of the house motivates a particular image of the side of the house; noematically this corresponds to a unity in the house itself, whereby we experience the two sides of the house as “belonging together” as parts of the same object (Ideas 2, p. 230). Husserl also considers associative cases where “A thought ‘reminds’ me of other thoughts and calls back into a memory a past lived experience” and even Freudian cases where the reason for the motivating tendency can only be brought to light by psychoanalysis (Ideas 2, p. 234).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Yoshimi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yoshimi, J. (2016). Motivation. In: Husserlian Phenomenology. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26698-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics