Skip to main content

Formation Reconfiguration Using Model Predictive Control Techniques for Multi-agent Dynamical Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developments in Model-Based Optimization and Control

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 464))

Abstract

The classical objective for multiple agents evolving in the same environment is the preservation of a predefined formation because it reinforces the safety of the global system and further lightens the supervision task. One of the major issues for this objective is the task assignment problem, which can be formulated in terms of an optimization problem by employing set-theoretic methods. In real time the agents will be steered into the defined formation via task (re)allocation and classical feedback mechanisms. The task assignment calculation is often performed in an offline design stage, without considering the possible variation of the number of agents in the global system. These changes (i.e., including/excluding an agent from a formation) can be regarded as a typical fault, due to some serious damages on the components or due to the operator decision. In this context, the present chapter proposes a new algorithm for the dynamical task assignment formulation of multi-agent systems in view of real-time optimization by including fault detection and isolation capabilities. This algorithm allows to detect whether there is a fault in the global multi-agent system, to isolate the faulty agent and to integrate a recovered/healthy agent. The proposed methods will be illustrated by means of a numerical example with connections to multi-vehicle systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Actuator faults are considered further.

  2. 2.

    The common reference is the reference of the formation center.

  3. 3.

    In practice, it may even become even adversary with respect to the team but such behavior is not considered here. In the following, all the intruders are considered as cooperative and their inclusion is automatically granted to the formation subject to reconfiguration.

References

  1. N. Meskin, K. Khorasani, Actuator fault detection and isolation for a network of unmanned vehicles. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 54(4), 835–840 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Meskin, K. Khorasani, A geometric approach to fault detection and isolation of continuous-time markovian jump linear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 55(6), 1343–1357 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Meskin, K. Khorasani, A hybrid fault detection and isolation strategy for a network of unmanned vehicles in presence of large environmental disturbances. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 18(6), 1422–1429 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Stankovic, N. Illic, Z. Djurovic, M. Stankovic, K.H. Johansson, Consensus based overlapping decentralized fault detection and isolation, in Proceedings of the Conference on Control and Fault Tolerant Systems, Nice (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Antonelli, F. Arrichiello, F. Caccavale, A. Marino, A decentralized controller-observer scheme for multi-agent weighted centroid tracking. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 58(5), 1310–1316 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Kempker, A. Ran, J. van Schuppen, A formation flying algorithm for autonomous underwater vehicles, in Proceedings of the 50th IEEE CDC, Orlando, Florida (2011), pp. 1293–1298

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Prodan, S. Olaru, C. Stoica, S. Niculescu, Predictive control for tight group formation of multi-agent systems, in Proceedings of the IFAC World Congress, Milan, Italy (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Stoican, S. Olaru, Set-Theoretic Fault-Tolerant Control in Multisensor Systems (Wiley, New York, 2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Stoican, S. Olaru, G. Bitsoris, Controlled invariance-based fault detection for multisensory control systems. Control Theory Appl., IET 7(4), 606–611 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Olaru, J.A. De Dona, M. Seron, F. Stoican, Positive invariant sets for fault tolerant multisensor control schemes. Int. J. Control 83(12), 2622–2640 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M.M. Seron, J.A. De Dona, Fault tolerant control using virtual actuators and invariant-set based fault detection and identification, in Proceedings of the 48th IEEE CDC and 28th CCC, Shanghai (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Franze, F. Tedesco, D. Famularo, Actuator fault tolerant control: a set-theoretic approach, in Proceedings of the 51st IEEE CDC, Maui, Hawaii (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Nguyen, C. Stoica Maniu, S. Olaru, A. Grancharova, About formation reconfiguration for multi-agent dynamical systems, in Proceedings of the Automatics and Informatics, Sofia, Bulgaria (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Nguyen, C. Stoica Maniu, S. Olaru, A. Grancharova, Fault tolerant predictive control for multi-agent dynamical systems: formation reconfiguration using set-theoretic approach, in Proceedings of the Control, Decision and Information Technologies, Metz, France (2014), pp. 417–422

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Rosich, H. Voos, M. Darouach, Cyber-attack detection based on controlled invariant sets, in Proceedings of the ECC, Strasbourg, France (2014), pp. 2176–2181

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Blanchini, S. Miani, Set-Theoretic Methods in Control (Birkhauser, Boston, 2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Kofman, H. Haimovich, M.M. Seron, A systematic method to obtain ultimate bounds for perturbed systems. Int. J. Control 80(2), 167–178 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. I. Prodan, Commande sous contraintes de systemes dynamiques multi-agents, Ph.D. thesis, Supelec, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. Prodan, F. Stoican, S. Olaru, S.I. Niculescu, Mixed-integer representations in control design: Mathematical foundations and applications, Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.-P. Aubin, Viability Theory (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of PHC RILA Project “Robust Distributed Model Predictive Control of Medium- and Large-Scale Systems” and PHC PESSOA “Advanced control of a fleet of heterogeneous autonomous vehicles”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minh Tri Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nguyen, M.T., Stoica Maniu, C., Olaru, S., Grancharova, A. (2015). Formation Reconfiguration Using Model Predictive Control Techniques for Multi-agent Dynamical Systems. In: Olaru, S., Grancharova, A., Lobo Pereira, F. (eds) Developments in Model-Based Optimization and Control. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 464. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26687-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26687-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26685-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26687-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics