Abstract
It is impossible in Health IT and healthcare generally to eliminate clinical risk. Therefore in any risk assessment there comes a point where one is forced to make a judgement on the level of risk which is acceptable. This begs the difficult question, acceptable to whom? A number of industries have adopted an approach originating from the UK, i.e. an understanding that the assessed risk needs to be reduced to As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). This key principle paves the way for organisations to justify residual risk once its nature has been characterised and its controls validated. This chapter examines the practicalities of setting the risk acceptability bar and the challenges in including clinical benefits in the justification.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC Guide 51:1999. 1999.
Manuele F. Acceptable risk – time for SH&E professionals to adopt the concept. Professional safety. 2010.
The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. [Online]. 2015 (cited Mar 2015). Available from: http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology.
Edwards v NCB. 1 KB 704, [1949] 1 ALL ER 743. 1949. http://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/nlj/content/being-reasonable.
Bibb B. The medical device risk management standard – an update. Safety-Critical Systems Club – Newsletter. 2005;14(3).
Health and Social Care Information Centre. ISB0129. Clinical risk management: its application in the manufacture of health IT systems version 2. UK Information Standard Board for Health and Social Care; 2013.
Health and Social Care Information Centre. ISB0160. Clinical risk management: its application in the deployment and use of health IT. UK Information Standard Board for Health and Social Care; 2013.
International Electrotechnical Commission. International Standard IEC 61508: functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety related systems. Geneva. 2000.
Health and Safety Executive. Reducing risks, protecting people. HSE’s decision making process. 2001.
International Organization for Standardization. EN ISO 14971:2012. Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical devices. 2012.
Council of the European Communities. Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. 1993.
Kaplan S, Garrick J. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1981;1(1):11–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stavert-Dobson, A. (2016). Acceptability and Ownership of Risk. In: Health Information Systems. Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26612-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26612-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26610-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26612-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)