Skip to main content

Acceptability and Ownership of Risk

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Health Information Systems

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 1605 Accesses

Abstract

It is impossible in Health IT and healthcare generally to eliminate clinical risk. Therefore in any risk assessment there comes a point where one is forced to make a judgement on the level of risk which is acceptable. This begs the difficult question, acceptable to whom? A number of industries have adopted an approach originating from the UK, i.e. an understanding that the assessed risk needs to be reduced to As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). This key principle paves the way for organisations to justify residual risk once its nature has been characterised and its controls validated. This chapter examines the practicalities of setting the risk acceptability bar and the challenges in including clinical benefits in the justification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC Guide 51:1999. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Manuele F. Acceptable risk – time for SH&E professionals to adopt the concept. Professional safety. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. [Online]. 2015 (cited Mar 2015). Available from: http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology.

  4. Edwards v NCB. 1 KB 704, [1949] 1 ALL ER 743. 1949. http://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/nlj/content/being-reasonable.

  5. Bibb B. The medical device risk management standard – an update. Safety-Critical Systems Club – Newsletter. 2005;14(3).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Health and Social Care Information Centre. ISB0129. Clinical risk management: its application in the manufacture of health IT systems version 2. UK Information Standard Board for Health and Social Care; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Health and Social Care Information Centre. ISB0160. Clinical risk management: its application in the deployment and use of health IT. UK Information Standard Board for Health and Social Care; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Electrotechnical Commission. International Standard IEC 61508: functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety related systems. Geneva. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Health and Safety Executive. Reducing risks, protecting people. HSE’s decision making process. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Organization for Standardization. EN ISO 14971:2012. Medical devices. Application of risk management to medical devices. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Council of the European Communities. Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan S, Garrick J. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1981;1(1):11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stavert-Dobson, A. (2016). Acceptability and Ownership of Risk. In: Health Information Systems. Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26612-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26612-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26610-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26612-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics