Skip to main content

Changing Mortality Patterns and Their Predictability: The Case of the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis ((PSDE,volume 39))

Abstract

Forecasting U.S. mortality is challenging due to its irregular development. Since the 1990s, men have experienced stronger increases in life expectancy than women. Prospective forecasts up to 2050 generated using the Lee-Carter model and three of its variants illustrate that an extrapolation of this trend involves not just the risk of forecasting only moderate gains in life expectancy, but also the risk of forecasting that men will outlive women in the long run. Jointly forecasting mortality trends of multiple (sub)populations appears to be the key to averting such implausible developments in the model of Hyndman et al. and in our model. Since we also (1) forecast the rates of mortality improvement (to catch dynamic age shifts in survival improvement) and (2) select reference countries in terms of their (a) overall level of mortality, (b) risk factor attributable mortality, and/or (c) cultural and political proximity, our model can also forecast long-term trend changes and accelerating increases in life expectancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bohk, C., & R. Rau (2014a). Bayesian mortality forecasts with a flexible age pattern of change for several European countries. In Proceedings of the sixth Eurostat/Unece work session on demographic projections (pp. 360–371).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohk, C., & Rau, R. (2014b). Probabilistic mortality forecasting with varying age-specific survival improvements. arXiv:1311.5380v2[stat.AP].

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, H., Maindonald, J., & Smith, L. (2002). Applying Lee-Carter under conditions of variable mortality decline. Population Studies, 56(3), 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, H., Hyndman, R. J., Tickle, L., & de Jong, P. (2006). Lee-Carter mortality forecasting: A multi-country comparison of variants and extensions. Demographic Research, 15(1–2), 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, A. J. G., Blake, D., Dowd, K., Coughlan, G. D., & Khalaf-Allah, M. (2011). Bayesian stochastic mortality modelling for two populations. ASTIN Bulletin, 41, 29–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caselli, G., Vaupel, J. W., & Yashin, A. I. (1985). Mortality in Italy: Contours of a century of evolution. Genus, 41(1–2), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, E. M., Preston, S. H., & Cohen, B. (Eds.). (2011). Explaining divergent levels of longevity in high-income countries. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaei, G., Ding, E. L., Mozaffarian, D., Taylor, B., Rehm, J., Murray, C. J. L., & Ezzati, M. (2009). The preventable causes of death in the United States: Comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Medicine, 6(4), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., Stremikis, K., Squires, D., & Schoen, C. (2014). Mirror, mirror on the wall. 2014 update: How the performance of the U.S. health care system compares internationally. The Commonwealth Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezzati, M., Martin, H., Skjold, S., Hoorn, S. V., & Murray, C. J. L. (2006). Trends in national and state-level obesity in the USA after correction for self-report bias: Analysis of health surveys. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambill, B. A., & Vaupel, J. W. (1985). The LEXIS program for creating shaded contour maps of demographic surfaces. Technical report, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) (Working Paper WP-85-094).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(6), 721–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., & Raftery, A. E. (2007). Probabilistic forecasts, calibration and sharpness. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 69(Part 2), 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S., & Renshaw, A. E. (2012). Parametric mortality improvement rate modelling and projecting. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50, 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman, R. J. (2014). Demography: Forecasting mortality, fertility, migration and population data. https://cran.r-project.org/package=demography

  • Hyndman, R. J., & Ullah, M. S. (2007). Robust forecasting of mortality and fertility rates: A functional data approach. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51(10), 4942–4956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman, R. J., Booth, H., & Yasmeen, F. (2013). Coherent mortality forecasting: The product-ratio method with functional time series models. Demography, 50(1), 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F., van Wissen, L. J. G., & Kunst, A. E. (2013). Including the smoking epidemic in internationally coherent mortality projections. Demography, 50(4), 1341–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., & Soneji, S. (2011). The future of death in America. Demographic Research, 25(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting U.S. Mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(419), 659–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R., & Miller, T. (2001). Evaluating the performance of the Lee-Carter method for forecasting mortality. Demography, 38, 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54(4), 421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., & Lee, R. (2005). Coherent mortality forecasts for a group of populations: An extension of the Lee-Carter method. Demography, 42(3), 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N., Lee, R., & Gerland, P. (2013). Extending the Lee-Carter method to model the rotation of age patterns of mortality decline for long-term projections. Demography, 50(6), 2037–2051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luy, M. (2002). Die geschlechtsspezifischen Sterblichkeitsunterschiede – Zeit für eine Zwischenbilanz. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie, Band 35, Heft 5, 412–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., Brockett, P., Mendoza-Arriage, R., & Muthuraman, K. (2013). Modeling and forecasting mortality rates. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52(2), 275–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (2013). Mortality data – Vital statistics. NCHS’s multiple cause of death data. Available at http://www.nber.org/data/multicause.html

  • Oeppen, J., & Vaupel, J. W. (2002). Broken limits to life expectancy. Science, 296, 1029–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzack, S. H. (2012). The philosophy of modelling or does the philosophy of biology have any use? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Statistical Society, 367(1586), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, M. (2011). JAGS Version 3.1.0 user manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. H., & Wang, H. (2006). Sex mortality differences in the United States: The role of cohort smoking patterns. Demography, 43(4), 631–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. H., Glei, D. A., & Wilmoth, J. R. (2010). A new method for estimating smoking-attributable mortality in high-income countries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39(2), 430–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/

  • Raftery, A. E., & Lewis, S. M. (1992). Comment: One long run with diagnostics: Implementation strategies for Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Statistical Science, 7, 493–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. E., Chunn, J. L., Gerland, P., & Ševčíková, H. (2013). Bayesian probabilistic projections of life expectancy for all countries. Demography, 50(3), 777–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, A. E., & Haberman, S. (2003). Lee-Carter mortality forecasting with age-specific enhancement. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33, 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, A. E., & Haberman, S. (2006). A cohort-based extension to the Lee-Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38, 556–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, H. L. (2012). Point and interval forecasts of age-specific life expectancies: A model averaging approach. Demographic Research, 27, 593–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang, H. L., Booth, H., & Hyndman, R. (2011). Point and interval forecasts of mortality rates and life expectancy: A comparison of ten principal component methods. Demographic Research, 25, 173–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soneji, S., & King, G. (2010). The future of death in America. Demographic Research, 25(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S. T., Cutler, D. M., & Rosen, A. B. (2009). Forecasting the effects of obesity and smoking on U.S. life expectancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 2252–2260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeldraijer, L., van Duin, C., van Wissen, L., & Janssen, F. (2013). Impact of different mortality forecasting methods and explicit assumptions on projected future life expectancy: The case of the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 29(13), 323–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torri, T., & Vaupel, J. W. (2012). Forecasting life expectancy in an international context. International Journal of Forecasting, 28, 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of California, Berkeley (USA), & Max Planck Institute for DemographicResearch, Rostock, (Germany). (2014). Human mortality database. Available at www.mortality.org

  • Vaupel, J. W., Gambill, B. A., & Yashin, A. I. (1985). Contour maps of population surfaces. Technical report, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) (Working Paper WP-85-047).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Preston, S. H. (2009). Forecasting United States mortality using cohort smoking histories. PNAS, 106(2), 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K. M. (2002). Longevity advances in high-income countries, 1955–96. Population and Development Review, 28(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2000). Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic (Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The European Research Council has provided financial support under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC grant agreement no. 263744.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Rau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bohk, C., Rau, R. (2016). Changing Mortality Patterns and Their Predictability: The Case of the United States. In: Schoen, R. (eds) Dynamic Demographic Analysis. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26603-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26603-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26601-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26603-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics