Modeling the Evolution of Age and Cohort Effects

  • Sam Schulhofer-WohlEmail author
  • Y. Claire Yang
Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 39)


The conventional linear model of age, period, and cohort (APC) effects suffers from a well-known identification problem: If an outcome depends on the sum of an age effect, a period effect, and a cohort effect, one cannot distinguish these three effects because birth year = current yearage. Less well appreciated is that the linear model suffers from a conceptual problem: It assumes that the marginal effect of age is the same at all times, the marginal effect of current conditions is the same for people of all ages, and cohorts do not change over time. We propose a new way of modeling APC effects that improves substantively and methodologically on the conventional linear model. We define cohort effects as an accumulation of age-by-period interactions. Although a long-standing literature conceptualizes cohort effects in exactly this way, we are the first to provide a statistical model. Our model allows age profiles to change over time and period effects to have different marginal effects on people of different ages. Except in special cases, the parameters of our model are identified. We apply the model to analyze changes in age-specific mortality in Sweden over 150 years. Our model fits the Swedish data dramatically better than the additive model. The rate of increase of mortality with age became more steep from 1881 to 1941, but since then has been roughly constant. The impact of early-life conditions lasts for several years but is unlikely to reach to old age.


Cohort effects Age-period-cohort identification problem Mortality Cohort morbidity phenotype hypothesis Sweden 


  1. Barbi, E., & Vaupel, J. W. (2005). Comment on “Inflammatory exposure and historical changes in human life-spans.” Science, 308(5729), 1743a.Google Scholar
  2. Deaton, A., & Paxson, C. (1994). Intertemporal choice and inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 102(3), 437–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elo, I. T., & Preston, S. H. (1992). Effects of early-life conditions on adult mortality: A review. Population Index, 58(2), 186–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fienberg, S. E., & Mason, W. M. (1985). Specification and implementation of age, period and cohort models. In W. M. Mason & S. E. Fienberg (Eds.), Cohort analysis in social research (pp. 45–88). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Finch, C. E., & Crimmins, E. M. (2004). Inflammatory exposure and historical changes in human life-spans. Science, 305(5691), 1736–1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenberg, B. G., Wright, J. J., & Sheps, C. G. (1950). A technique for analyzing some factors affecting the incidence of syphilis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 45(251), 373–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heligman, L., & Pollard, J. H. (1980). The age pattern of mortality. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 107, 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hobcraft, J., Menken, J., & Preston, S. H. (1982). Age, period, and cohort effects in demography: A review. Population Index, 48(1), 4–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horiuchi, S. (1983). The long-term impact of war on mortality: Old-age mortality of the first world war survivors in the Federal Republic of Germany. Population Bulletin of the United Nations, 15, 80–92.Google Scholar
  10. Human Mortality Database. (2007). University of California, Berkeley (USA), and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany). Accessed November 13, 2007.
  11. James, I. R., & Segal, M. R. (1982). On a method of mortality analysis incorporating age-year interaction, with application to prostate cancer mortality. Biometrics, 38(2), 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(419), 659–671.Google Scholar
  13. Mason, W. M., & Smith, H. L. (1985). Age-period-cohort analysis and the study of deaths from pulmonary tuberculosis. In W. M. Mason & S. E. Fienberg (Eds.), Cohort analysis in social research (pp. 151–228). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mason, K. O., Mason, W. M., Winsborough, H. H., & Poole, W. K. (1973). Some methodological issues in cohort analysis of archival data. American Sociological Review, 38(2), 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moolgavkar, S. H., Stevens, R. G., & Lee, J. A. H. (1979). Effect of age on incidence of breast cancer in females. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 62(3), 493–501.Google Scholar
  16. Noymer, A., & Garenne, M. (2000). The 1918 influenza epidemic’s effects on sex differentials in mortality in the United States. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Omran, A. R. (1982). Epidemiologic transition. In Ross, J. A. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of population (pp. 172–183). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Reither, E. N., Masters, R. K., Yang, Y. C., Powers, D. A., Zheng, H., & Land, K. C. (2015). Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s? Social Science & Medicine, 128, 356–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robertson, C., Gandini, S., & Boyle, P. (1999). Age-period-cohort models: A comparative study of available methodologies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(6), 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schulhofer-Wohl, S., & Yang, Y. (2011). Modeling the evolution of age and cohort effects in social research: Technical appendix. Accessed December 29, 2014.
  22. United Nations. (1997). United Nations demographic yearbook 1997, historical supplement, table 11. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  23. United Nations. (2003). Long-range population projections: Proceedings of the United Nations technical working group on long-range population projections. Accessed December 29, 2014. Google Scholar
  24. Vaupel, J. W., Manton, K. G., & Stallard, E. (1979). The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography, 16(3), 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang, Y. C., & Land, K. C. (2013). Misunderstandings, mischaracterizations, and the problematic choice of a specific instance in which the IE should never be applied. Demography, 50(6), 1969–1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations