Skip to main content

Simulation in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Midwifery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Simulation in Healthcare Education

Abstract

Up to the seventeenth century, pregnancy and childbirth was surrounded by ignorance, myth, and superstition. It was thought that labor pains were caused by the fetus clawing its way out of the womb and that fetal malformations were the result of a woman seeing or dreaming something bad during the pregnancy. Complications of labor were thought to be predetermined and astrologists were consulted for information about the birth and the child. Most births occurred at home with female relatives and friends providing emotional support and sometimes a midwife provided “expert” assistance although in some European cities poor women delivered in lying-in hospitals. The title “midwife” was generally self-professed and based on experience attending births, sometimes as an apprentice, although at different times and places midwives were licensed by the church [1, pp. 24–49].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This Peter Chamberlen (1601–1683) is often called “Dr Peter” because he studied at Cambridge, Heidelberg and Padua where he was awarded an MD at the age of 18. He retired to Woodham Mortimer Hall, Essex, where in 1813 a collection of obstetric instruments was found hidden under the attic floor. They are now held by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in London. (Ref http://www.rcog.org.uk/what-we-do/information-services/-collections/rcog-heritage-chamberlen-family)

  2. 2.

    Puerperal fever, also called childbed fever, is a bacterial infection that was almost always fatal until antibiotics were discovered. The disease and its close connection to simulation are described later.

  3. 3.

    This procedure had been described by Soranus of Ephesus around 1500 years earlier.

  4. 4.

    All Houston’s training in obstetrics was wasted as although well qualified he was never able to gain a position where he could use this expertise.

  5. 5.

    Alexander Monro, also known as Monro Primus or Monro the elder, helped establish the Medical School in Edinburgh and was the patriarch of a medical dynasty.

  6. 6.

    A louis or louis d’or (gold louis) was a unit of currency in France in the eighteenth century. It was revalued several times so it is too hard to calculate equivalent value in a modern currency.

  7. 7.

    Baudelocque died in 1810 so never worked at la Maternité but the facility is now officially called Maternité Baudelocque.

  8. 8.

    This unusual spelling was used twice so it probably wasn’t a typographical error.

  9. 9.

    Caoutchouc was the term first used for latex rubber originating from South America.

  10. 10.

    The war in Europe began had an effect on the prices of goods from that region and in 1915 a 20 % surcharge was levied on orders.

  11. 11.

    William Harvey constructed the first pulse simulator which is described in the physiological simulators section.

  12. 12.

    Gregoire started teaching midwifery in Paris and established the first obstetric clinic at the Hôtel-Dieu. He was joined by his son, Gregoire the younger. It is not known when they actually began using a simulator in their teaching.

  13. 13.

    Mackenzie’s brother was advised to take the payment in gold rather than bills which could go down in value but on the journey back to Scotland he lost around 250 guineas through a hole in the bullion chest.

  14. 14.

    “Fantoccio” was the term most widely used for a fetal simulator in Italy in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

  15. 15.

    When the French controlled the region, the University of Siena was closed from 1808 to 1814.

  16. 16.

    Giuseppe Vespa, the professor of obstetrics in Florence, had studied under Levret in Paris and may have brought his ideas for simulation from there.

  17. 17.

    A miasma was the noxious emanation from decaying organic matter.

  18. 18.

    Carl Rudolf Braun was also known as Karl Braun or Karl von Braun-Fernwald and after he was knighted became Carl Ritter von Fernwald Braun.

  19. 19.

    Schultes began making the Schultze simulator in 1890 and this company, now called Schultes Medacta, still makes obstetric simulators which makes it the oldest company making simulators used in medical education.

  20. 20.

    Bodies were dissected fresh and this was less unpleasant in the cold winter months.

  21. 21.

    In his presentation Ely ascribed his longevity to “a good heredity” and he died the next week.

  22. 22.

    Obstetric patients were admitted several weeks before delivery was expected and stayed for a few weeks afterwards.

  23. 23.

    Reed is best known for his work on yellow fever and in particular confirming a mosquito transmitted the illness. The Walter Reed Army Medical Center and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research were named after him.

  24. 24.

    In the eighteenth century this was known as a hysteroplasmen.

  25. 25.

    At the end of the nineteenth century obstetrics became settled as a surgical discipline.

  26. 26.

    Baudelocque died before the final move and never worked at the Hospice de la Maternité which was later renamed in his honor.

  27. 27.

    This wide-ranging conflict, that was later called the Seven Years War, was costly for France in territories as well as troops.

  28. 28.

    In adopting the name Madame du Coudray she reinvented herself as a widow. It hasn’t been explained why she did this but it may have been to overcome some of the constraints on single women in the French society then.

  29. 29.

    In a letter Graves wrote to Hazel Corbin in 1956 she used the terms “mannakin” and “mannikin”.

References

  1. Evenden D. Ecclesiastical licensing of midwives. The midwives of seventeenth-century London. Cambridge [England]. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Radcliffe WRW. Milestones in midwifery and the secret instrument: the birth of the midwifery forceps. San Francisco: Norman; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whitehead B. Women’s education in early modern Europe: a history, 1500 to 1800. New York: Taylor & Francis; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Longshore J. The Philadelphia system of obstetrics: in twelve parts. Philadelphia: University Publication Society; 1868.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn P. The Chamberlen family (1560–1728) and obstetric forceps. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999;81(3):F232–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Glaister J. Dr. William Smellie and his contemporaries; a contribution to the history of midwifery in the eighteenth century. Glasgow: Maclehose; 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parkinson J. The hospital pupil; or, an essay intended to facilitate the study of medicine and surgery. London: H. D. Symonds; 1800.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kock W. Glimpses into the history of obstetrics and gynaecology in Stockholm. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1960;39:479–98.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lindfors A. Ueber Johan von Hoorn, sein Leben und seine Werke. Monatschrift fuer Geburtshilfe und Gynaekologie. 1896;3(1):58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langsdorff G. Phantasmatum sive machinarum ad artis obstetriciae exercitia facientium vulgo fantôme dictarum brevis historia. Gottingae: H. M. Grape; 1797.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison J. A short comparative view of the practice of surgery in the French hospitals: with some remarks on the study of anatomy and midwifry: the whole endeavouring to prove, that the advantages to students, in These Professions, are Greater at London, Than at Paris: Interspers'd, with Critical Observations on the Nature and Use of Oil of Turpentine, the Bougie, &c. Jacob Robinson; 1750.

    Google Scholar 

  12. La Motte E. The Hotel Dieu of Paris: an historical sketch. Med Libr Hist J. 1906;4(3):225–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Packard F. Life and times of Ambroise Pare (1510-1590) with a new translation of his Apology and an account of his journeys in divers places. New York: P.B. Hoeber; 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Unknown. The history of Paris from the earliest period to the present day: containing a description of its antiquities, public buildings, civil, religious, scientific, and commercial institutions. London: G.B. Whittaker; 1827.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dunn P. Paul Portal (1630–1703), man-midwife of Paris. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91:F385–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Portal P. The compleat practice of men and women midwives, or the true manner of assisting a woman in child-bearing. London: H. Clark; 1705.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cabanes A. Curious bypaths of history, being medico-historical studies and observations; pathological studies of the past. Paris: C. Carrington; 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell R. William Smellie—master of British midwifery. Can Med Assoc J. 1943;48:536–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hecquet P. De l’Indecence aux Hommes D’Accoucher Les Femmes, et De l’Obligation aux Femmes De Nourrir Leurs Enfans; 1708.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grell OP, Cunningham A, Arrizabalaga J. Centres of medical excellence?: medical travel and education in Europe, 1500-1789. Farnham: Ashgate; 2010. p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glaister J. Review of Dr. William Smellie and his contemporaries; a contribution to the history of midwifery in the eighteenth century. Dublin J Med Sci. 1894;3(278).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Houstoun J. The works of James Houstoun, M. D., containing memoirs of his life and travels in Asia, Africa, America and most parts of Europe. From the year 1690 to the present time. Giving a particular account of the Scotch expedition to Darien in America … the rise, progress, and fall of the two great trading African and South-Sea companies; the late expedition to the Spanish West-Indies; the taking and restitution of Cape-Breton. Some curious anecdotes of the Spanish court. London: Printed for the Author; and Sold by S. Bladon; 1753, p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Unknown. The Georgian era: memoirs of the most eminent persons, who have flourished in Great Britain in four volumes. London: Vizetelly, Branston; 1833.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merrimen S. Being a continuation of the eclectic repertory. J Foreign Med Sci Lit. 1822;2(5).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Onslow M. Obstetrical researches. Lond Med Repository Rev. 1821;15:101–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smellie W. Smellie’s Treatise on the theory and practice of midwifery. Ed. with annotations, by Alfred H. McClintock. London: The New Sydenham Society; 1876.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Douillard S. Les Maternites Hospitalieres de Nantes des Origines a 1945: Universite de Nantes; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gelbert NR. The king’s midwife: a history and mystery of Madame du Coudray. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1998. p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Association d’histoire des hôpitaux et du patrimoine santé de Nantes (AHHPSN). Sage-femme, Marguerite-Angélique Le Boursier du Coudray a parcouru la France pendant 25 ans pour enseigner les techniques d’accouchement difficile. 2011. http://www.chu-nantes.fr/marguerite-angelique-le-boursier-du-coudray-26519.kjsp.

  30. Dunn P. Jean-Louis Baudelocque (1746-1810) of Paris and L’art des accouchemens. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F370–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Morel M-F. Biography of Jean-Luc Baudelocque. 2010. http://www.biusante.parisdescartes.fr//histmed/medica/baudelocque.htm.

  32. Unknown. L’Avantcourer Feuille Hebdomadaire; 1773. p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Unknown. Mercure de France Dedie au Roi, par une Societe De Gens de Lettres; 1781. p. 126–7.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Unknown. Divers articles de nouvelles inventions dans les arts, & de decouvertes nouvelles dans les sciences. J Encyclopedique ou Universel. 1781;6: 155–6.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Prudhomme L. Biheron (Mademoiselle). Biographie Universelle et Historique des Femmes Celebres Mortes ou Vivantes (AB-BY); 1830. p. 363–4.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gargam A. Savoirs mondains, savoirs savants: les femmes et leurs cabinets de curiosités au siècle des Lumières. Genre & Histoire (online). 2009;5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Grimm F. Correspondance Litteraire, Philosophique et Critique, Adressee A Un Souvrain D’Allemagne, depuis 1770 Jusq’en 1782; 1812.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Centre international d’etude du XVIIIe siecle. The Linnaean correspondence—letters. 1769. http://linnaeus.c18.net/Letters/display_sum.php?id_letter=L4163&person_from=Jacob%20Jonas%20Bj%F6rnst%E5hl&person_to=Carl%20Linnaeus&date=15%20April%201769.

  39. Sue P. Essais Historiques, Litteraires et Critiques, Sur l’Art Des Accouchemens: ou Recherches; 1779. p. 446.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Unknown. Mannequin. Dictionaire des Sciences Medicales, Par Une Societe de Medecins et de Chirurgiens. Mai-Mer ed; 1818.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Unknown. Bulletin de la Societe D’Agriculture, Sciences et Arts de la Sarthe; 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dulac H. Almanach des Adresses de Tous Les Commercans de Paris Pour L’Annee 1820; 1820. p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dumeril C. Seances de la Societe. Bulletins de La Faculte de Medecine de Paris et De La Societe Etablie Dans Son Sein; 1820. p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chaussier TM. Rapport fait a la Societe de la Faculte de Medecine de Paris. J Univ Sci Med. 1820:125–30.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Verdier P. Traité pratique des hernies, déplacements et maladies de la matrice. Paris: Chez l’auteur; 1840.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Unger L, Klose F. 406- Ein neues Fantom fuer den Unterricht in der Entbindungskunst. Summarium des Neuesten aus der gesamten Medicin; 1828. p. 402.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ozenne G. Rapport sur le Mannequin Tokomatique ou Automate Obstetrical; 1831.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ozenne G. Rapport sur un nouveau mannequin destine a l'edtude des accouchemens. Academie Royale de Science; 1831.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Unknown. Anatomical and obstetric machinery. Lancet. 1831;2:285–6.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bushe G. A new maunequin. N Y Med Chir Bull. 1831;1:200.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Unknown. Surgical sketches of Paris, by an American student—no. III. Boston Med Surg J. 1833;8:316–9.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Manuel DE. Walking the Paris hospitals: diary of an Edinburg medical student, 1834-1835. London: The Wellcome Trust Center for the History of Medicine; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Burton JK. Napoleon and the woman question: discourses of the other sex in French education, medicine, and medical law 1799-1815. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Flaubert G. Amateur Chemists. Bouvard et Pécuchet. Chicago: Simon P Magee; 1904. p. 72–122.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dunn P. Stéphane Tarnier (1828–1897), the architect of perinatology. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;86:F137–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Dunn P. Professor Pierre Budin (1846-1907) of Paris, and modern perinatal care. Arch Dis Child. 1995;73:F193–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Dunn P. Adolphe Pinard (1844-1934) of Paris and intrauterine paediatric care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91:F231–2. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.074518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Hardy A. Commentary: bread and alum, syphilis and sunlight: rickets in the nineteenth century. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(3):337–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dunnigan M. Commentary: John Snow and alum-induced rickets from adulterated London bread: an overlooked contribution to metabolic bone disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:340–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Obstetrical Society of London. Obstetric model. Br Med J. 1877;2:808.

    Google Scholar 

  61. London Examiner. Obstetric phantoms. N C Med J. 1878;1(1):54–5.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tarnier M. Enseignement obstetrical. Gazette hebdomaire de medicine et de chirugie. 1877;14(2):815–6.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Trush J. Transactions of the Obstetrical Society of Cincinnati—Obstetric Manikin of Drs Budin and Pinard, of Paris. Am J Obstet Dis Women Child. 1880;13:170–4.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bourneville. L’Annee Medicale 1878; 1879. p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Witkowski G. Histoire des Accouchements Chez Tous Les Peuples. Paris: G. Steinheil; 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bar P. Recherches experimentales et cliniques pour servir a l’histoire de l’embryotomie cephalique. Paris: Asselin et Houzeau; 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Barnes RBF. A system of obstetric medicine and surgery, theoretical and clinical, for the student and practitioner. London: Smith, Elder; 1884.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Biblioteca Medica Statale. La Torre, Felice (1846–1923). In: Medici in posa: Ritratti di medici e scienziati. Rome: Biblioteca Medica Statale. http://bms.beniculturali.it/ritratti/index.php.

  69. Cincinnati College. Annual announcement of the Cincinnati College of Medicine and Surgery—for 1880–81—forty-sixth regular session; 1880. p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  70. University of Maryland. Annual circular of the School of Medicine for the session of 1880-1881 and catalogue for the session of 1879–1880; 1880.

    Google Scholar 

  71. McGill College and the University of Montreal. Calendar 1899-1900. Montreal: University of Montreal; 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Fry H. Obstetrics—School of Medicine. In: Georgetown University, editor. A catalogue of the officers and students of Georgetown University. Washington: Georgetown University; 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Farabeuf LH, Varnier H. Principes fondamentaux d'obstétrique vérifiés, rectifiés ou établis à l'aide de l'expérimentation sur le mannequin naturel et de l'observation sur la parturiente. Introduction à l'étude clinique et à la pratique des accouchements : anatomie, présentations et positions, mécanisme, toucher, manoeuvres, extraction du siège, version, forceps, par le professeur L.-H. Farabeuf et le Dr Henri Varnier. Préface du professeur A. Pinard. Paris: G. Steinheil; 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Unknown. Reviews and notices—principes Fondamenteux D’Obstetrique—Professeur L.H. Farabeuf et le Docteur Henri Varnier. BMJ. 1891:192.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Williams J, editor. Teaching obstetrics. In: Association of American Medical Colleges. Denver. Easton: Chemical Publishing; 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ward C. Catalogue of human and comparative skeletons, osteological specialties and anatomical models. Rochester: Gillies Press; 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kny-Scheerer Corporation. 20th edition health sciences standard. New York; 1915. p. 5053–61.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Antz H. A table for maniken demonstrations. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1920;31:89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Reed CB. Operative obstetrics on the manikin for students and practitioners. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston’s Son; 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kny-Scheerer Corporation. Catalog of surgical instruments of superior quality. 25th ed. Long Island City; 1941. p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Drapier et Fils (Maison). Catalogue d’instruments de chirurgie, mobilier chirurgical, appareils de sterilisation et de laboratoires, électricité médicale, orthopédie, prothèse, bandages. Paris; 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Peachey GC. Note upon the provision for lying-in women in London up to the middle of the eighteenth century. Proc R Soc Med. 1924;17:72–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Johnstone RW. William Harvey, the father of British midwifery. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1948;55(3):293–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Willis R. The works of William Harvey, MD; 1847.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Thiery M. Willughby’s observations in midwifery: the Dutch translation. Vesalius. 1996;2(2):106–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Willughby P. Observations in midwifery; 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Unknown. The Edinburgh practice of physic, surgery, and midwifery: preceded by an abstract of the theory of medicine, and the nosology of Dr. Cullen: and including upwards of six hundred authentic formulae: vol. 5. Midwifery. London: Printed for G. Kearsley; 1803.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Maubry J. The Female physician, containing all the diseases incident to sex, virgins, wives and widows. London: Printed for James Holland; 1724.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Chapman E. A treatise on the improvement in midwifery, chiefly with regard to operation. London; 1735.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Manningham R. From the lying in infirmary in Jermyn Street, St Jame’s. London Evening Post. 1740; p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Manningham R. Artis obstetricariæ compendium tam theoriam quam praxin. Halæ Magdeburgicæ; 1746.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Manningham R. An abstract of midwifry. London: T. Gardner; 1744.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Rudd S. The certain method to know the disease: A lecture address’d to students in physic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library; 1757.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Manningham R. A single lecture in midwifery, on the glass machine. An abstract of midwifry. London: T. Gardner; 1744. p. 21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Dewhurst J. Felix Macdonogh, man-midwife. Paragon or charlatan? J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;8(2):99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Smellie W. Smellie’s Treatise on the theory and practice of midwifery. Ed. with annotations, by Alfred H. McClintock. London: The New Sydenham Society; 1877.

    Google Scholar 

  97. MacFarquhar C, Gleig G. Encyclopaedia Britanica. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar; 1797.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Smellie W. Lectures advertisement. London Evening Post. 1741.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Smellie W. A treatise on the theory and practice of midwifery. 5th ed. Corrected ed. London; 1766.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Johnstone RW. William Smellie, the master of British midwifery. Edinburgh: Livingstone; 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Liston J. From obstetrics to oryctology: inside the mind of William Hunter (1718-1783). Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ. 2013;375(1):349–73.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Van Heiningen T. Wouter Van Doeveren and Petrus Camper in Paris—travel diaries kept in the years 1752-1753, 1777 & 1787 and related correspondence. Den Haag: DWC; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Harrison J. A short comparative view of the practice of surgery in the French hospitals: with some remarks on the study of anatomy and midwifry: the whole endeavouring to prove, that the advantages to students, in these professions, are greater at London, than at Paris: Interspers’d, with critical observations on the nature and use of oil of turpentine. The Bougie, &c. Jacob Robinson; 1750.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Douglas W. A letter to Dr. Smelle [sic] Shewing the impropriety of his new-invented wooden forceps; as also, the absurdity of his method of teaching and practising midwifry. By William Douglas. London: Printed for J. Roberts; 1748.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Smellie W. [A cour]se of lectures upon midwifery: wherein the theory and practice of that art are explain’d in the clearest manner. … By Mr. Smellie. S.l. Printed in the year; 1742.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Nihell E. A treatise on the art of midwifery. London: Printed for A. Morley; 1760.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Unknown. Review of a treatise on the art of midwifery by Elizabeth Nihell. Crit Rev. 1760; 4: 187–97.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Lieske P. Made in imitation of real women and children’: obstetrical machines in eighteenth-century Britain. In: Mangham A, Depledge G, editors. The female body in medicine and literature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Paterson S. A catalogue of the entire and inestimable apparatus for lectures in midwifery contrived with consummate judgement, and executed with infinite labour, by the late ingenious Dr. William Smellie, deceased; 1770.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Hibbard B. Milestone in the evolution of obstetric forceps. p. 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Chaplin SDJ. John Hunter and the ‘museum oeconomy’, 1750-1800. London: University of London; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Kirkpatrick T, Jellet H. The Book of the Rotunda Hospital—an illustrated history of the Dublin Lying-in Hospital from its foundation in 1745 to the present time. London: Adlard & son, Bartholomew Press; 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Morris WI. Colin Mackenzie MD (St Andrews): an estranged pupil of William Smellie. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975;82(10):769–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Shelton D. Man-midwifery history: 1730-1930. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(8):718–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Wadd W. Mems, maxims and memoirs. London: Callow and Wilson; 1827. p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Unknown. Review of the life of William Hey by John Pearson. London: The Leeds Correspondent, A Literary, Mathematical, and Philosophical Miscellany; 1822.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Kelly C. A course of lectures on midwifery; 1757.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Denman T. An introduction to the practice of midwifery. New York: G. & C. & H. Carvill [u.a.]; 1782.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Denman T. Aphorisms on the application and use of the forceps and vectis: on preternatural labours, on labours attended with hemmorhage, and with convulsions. The First American Edition. Philadelphia: Printed for Benjamin Johnson; 1803.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Ryan M, Denman T. The obstetrician’s vademecum; or, aphorisms on natural and difficult parturition; the application and use of instruments in preternatural labours; on labours complicated with haemorrhage, convulsions etc etc. 9th ed. London: Cox; 1836. p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Bower F, David D. Davis’s ObstetricTextbook and Atlas. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;43:338–340.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Blundell J, Cooper A, Rogers N. The principles and practice of obstetric medicine. London: Printed for Joseph Butler; 1840.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Burns J. The principles of midwifery: including the diseases of women and children. London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longmans; 1837.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Leake J. A course of lectures on the theory and practice of midwifery: … by John Leake. London: A.D.; 1767.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Leake J. Syllabus or general heads of a course of lectures on the theory and practice of midwifery: including the nature and treatment of disease incident to women and children. London: J. Murray; 1787.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Geyer-Kordesch J, Macdonald F. Physicians and surgeons in Glasgow, 1599-1858: the history of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow. London: Hambledon Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Young T. A course of lectures upon midwifery. Edinburgh: Printed in the Year; 1750.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Harnett J. Advertisement—osteological repository. Med Times. 1841;3(79):312.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Lee R. Three hundred consultations in midwifery. London: John Churchill; 1864.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Lee R. Clinical midwifery: comprising the histories of five hundred and forty-five cases of difficult, preternatural, and complicated labour, with commentaries. Philadelphia: Lea & Blanchard; 1849.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Unknown. Review of three hundred consultations in midwifery by Robert Lee. Lancet. 1864;1(10):272–4.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Simpson J. Dr J. Y. Simpson’s testimonials relative to the chair of midwifery and descriptive catalogue of his obstetric museum. Edinburgh: T. Allen; 1840.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Bischoff J. Studienreisen nach Wien, London, Glasgow, Edinburgh und Dublin während der Jahre 1867-68. Gynaecologia Helvetica. 1905: 287–325.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Dougal D. The teaching of practical obstetrics. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1933;40(1):99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Humphreys F. Dummy for practising the diagnosis of foetal presentation by external abdominal palpation. Trans Hunter Soc. 1902;1900–1901:99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Eloesser L. A simplified obstetric phantom. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;68:948–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Bonney V. Discussion on the teaching of obstetrics. Proc R Soc Med. 1932:71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Candia L. Primi Saggi Enrico Piraino Barone di Mandralisca (Seconde parte). Rassegna Siciliana di Storia e Cultura. 2013; 28.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Cavallo S. Charity and power in early modern Italy: benefactors and their motives in Turin, 1541-1789. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Universita di Bologna. Giovanni Antonio Galli; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Messbarger RM. The lady anatomist: the life and work of Anna Morandi Manzolini. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani. Antonio Cartolari; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Fabbri GB. Antico museo ostetrico di Giovanni Antonio Galli, restauro fatto alle sue operazioni in plastica e nuova conferma della suprema importanza dell’ostetricia sperimentale: discorso letto nella sessione del 2 maggio 1872 dell’Accademia delle Scienze dell’Istituto di Bologna. Bologna: Tipi Gamberini E Parmeggiani; 1872. p. 129–66.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Bresadola M. Medicine and science in the life of Luigi Galvani (1737-1798). Brain Res Bull. 1998;46(5):367–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Vannozzi F. Fantocci, Marchingegni e Modelli nella didattica ostetrica Senese. Nascere a Siena. 2005: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Vannozzi F. Nascere a Siena: il parto e l’assistenza alla nascita dal Medioevo all’età moderna. Siena: Protagon: Nuova immagine; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Corradini E. Percorsi di valorizzazione per i Musei Anatomici di Modena: il Museo Ostetrico, il Museo Anatomico, il Museo Etnografico Antropologico e il Museo di Medicina Tropicale Museologia Scientifica nuova serie. 2011;5(1–2):97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Bononi G. Dialoghi Piacevoli Diretti Alla Conservazione Delle Giovani Spose E De Teneri Loro Bambini; 1784.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Maerker A. Bodies and the state. Model experts: wax anatomies and enlightenment in Florence and Vienna, 1775-1815. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Roederer J. Elementi d'Ostetricia del Dott. Gio. Giorgio Roederer, tradotti e corredati di tavole. Giornale Della Letteratura Italiana. 1795;5: 392–3.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Roederer J. Descrizione di un di Ostetricia Immaginata Dal Professore Giuseppe Galleti. Elementi d’Ostetricia del Dott. Gio. Giorgio Roederer, tradotti e corredati di tavole; 1791.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Calderoni L. Museo dei Ferri Chirurgici. 2013. https://associazione9cento.wordpress.com/produzioni/pistoia-e-dintorni/ospedale-del-ceppo/museo-dei-ferri-chirurgici/.

  153. Fratello B, Maramaldo R, Andreoli S, Tongiorgi P. Una collezione settecentesca del Museo di Anatomia dell’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia. I modelli ostetrici realizzati in terracotta da Giovan Battista Manfredini Museologia Scientifica Memorie. 2008; 2: 215–20.

    Google Scholar 

  154. Logan GB. Women and the practicing and teaching of medicine in Bologna in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Bull Hist Med. 2003;77(3):506–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Luigia M. Raccolta Generale Delle Leggi per Gli Stati Di Parma, Piacenza e Guastalla—Anno 1840; 1840. p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  156. Bonghi R. Regolamento della Facolta di medicina e chirurgia. Gazzetta Ufficiale del Regno d’Italia. 1875;263:6986.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Regio Universita di Torino. Annuario della R. Universita di Torino 1899–1900; 1900. p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Corradi A. Della chirurgia in Italia. Dagli ultimi anni del secolo scorso fino al presente. In risposta al programma di concorso della Società Medico-Chirurgica di Bologna per l’anno 1870; 1870.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Stein G, Monteggia G. Arte Ostetricia. 1800.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Unknown. Bullettino delle scienze mediche. vol 2. Società e Scuola medica chirurgica di Bologna; 1839.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Stein G, Briot P. L’art d’accoucher. Translated to German in the 5th edition by PF Briot ed; 1804.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Siebold Ev. Essai D’Une Histoire De L’Obstetricie; 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Vannozzi F. Una palestra per la didattica ostetrica : il ricovero di maternità. Figure femminili (e non) intorno alla nascita; 2005. p. 225–43.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Börner F. Die Gebährende Frau. Frankfurt, Leipzig; 1752.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Cranz HJN. Einleitung in eine wahre und gegründete Hebammenkunst. Wien: Edler von Trattner; 1768.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Neuburger M. Die Wiener medizinische Schule im Vormärz. Wien: Rikola; 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Fischer J. Geschichte der Geburtshilfe in Wien. Leipzig and Wien: Franz Deuticke; 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Steidele R. Vierter Theil. Vom Gebrauch der Instrumente. Abhandlung von der Geburtshuelfe; 1803. p. Vorbericht.

    Google Scholar 

  169. Stein G. L’art d’accoucher; 1804.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Killy, W and Vierhaus, R. Schmidt-Theyer: The Dictionary of German National Biography. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  171. Schlumbohm J. The practice of practical education: male students and female apprentices in the Lying-in hospital of Göttingen University, 1792–1815. Med Hist. 2007;51(1):3–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Osiander FB. Denkwürdigkeiten für die Heilkunde und Geburtshilfe; 1794.

    Google Scholar 

  173. Rödling U. Georg Heinrich von Langsdorff—der Weltumsegler. http://www.lahrer-hinkender-bote.de/art20.html.

  174. Siebold AEv. Uber praktischen Unterricht in der Entbindungskunst: nebst einer systematischen Uebersicht seiner praktischen Uebungen am Phantom. Nürnberg: Im verlage der Grattenauerischen Buchhandlung; 1803.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Siebold Ev. Anleitung zum geburtshülflichen technischen Verfahren am Phantome, als Vorbereitung zur künftigen Ausübung der Geburtshülfe (Instructions for obstetrical procedures on technical phantoms, in preparation for future exercise of obstetrics). Berlin: Enslin; 1828.

    Google Scholar 

  176. Siebold Ev. Geburtshülfliche Briefe; 1862.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Unknown. Book review—Geburtshülfliche Briefe von ECJ von Siebold. Edinb Med J. 1862;3:255–63.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Parsons F. Report of the trial—the people versus Dr Horatio N Loomis. Buffalo: Jewett, Thomas; 1850.

    Google Scholar 

  179. Püschmann TH. Handbuch der Geschichte der Medizin; 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Puschmann T. Die Medicin in Wien waehrend der letzten 100 Jahre; 1884.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Owen H. Unexpected consequences of simulator use in medical education: a cautionary tale. Soc Simul Healthc. 2014;9(3):149–52.

    Google Scholar 

  182. Wilkes J. Encyclopaedia londensis: or universal dictionary or arts, science and literature. London: J. Adlard; 1823. p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  183. von Gyory T. Semmelweis Gesammelte Werkes Herausgegeben und zum Theil aus dem Ungarischen Übersetzt. Jena: Gustav Fischer; 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  184. Semmelweis I. The etiology, concept, and prophylaxis of childbed fever. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1983. p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Campbell W. Dr Campbell on puerperal fever. Lond Med Gazette. 1832;9:353–4.

    Google Scholar 

  186. Wendell Holmes O. Puerperal fever as a private pestilence. Boston: Ticknor and Fields; 1855.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Spirer H, Spirer L. Death and numbers: Semmelweis the statistician. PSR Q. 1991;1:43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  188. Routh C. On the causes of the endemic puerperal fever of Vienna. Med Times. 1849;19:146–7.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Elek SD. Semmelweis and the oath of Hippocrates. Proc R Soc Med. 1996;59:346–52.

    Google Scholar 

  190. Osiander FB. Beitrage zur Geburtskunde, geschichtlichen und praktischen Inhalts. Neue Zeitschrift fur Geburtskunde. 1845;17:153–67.

    Google Scholar 

  191. Routh C. On the causes of the endemic puerperal fever of Vienna. Med Chir Trans. 1849;32:27–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Newsom S. Pioneers in infection control. Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis. J Hosp Infect. 1993;23:175–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Semmelweis IF. The etiology, concept, and prophylaxis of childbed fever. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1983. p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  194. Carter KC, Tate GS. Texts and documents. The earliest-known account of Semmelweis’s initiation of disinfection at Vienna’s Allgemeines Krankenhaus. Bull Hist Med. 1991;65(2):252–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. Noakes T, Borrense J, Hew-Butler T, Lambert M, Jordaan E. Semmelweis and the aetiology of puerperal sepsis 160 years on: an historical review. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136:1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Lesky E. Die Wiener medizinische Schule im 19. Jahrhundert. Graz: Böhlau; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  197. Oliver Jr H. The Vienna Hospitals—letter from Henry K. Oliver Jr, MD, of Boston. Boston Med Surg J. 1857;57(3):49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  198. Singer SL. Adventures abroad North American women at German-speaking universities, 1868 1915. Westport: Praeger. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  199. Rigler J. Das Medicinische Berlin; 1873.

    Google Scholar 

  200. Unknown. The study of obstetrics in Prague. Med News. 1885; 47: 444–5.

    Google Scholar 

  201. Martin E. Zur Gynäkologie; Beiträge. Jena: Fromman; 1849.

    Google Scholar 

  202. Schultze BS. Verbesserung des Phantoms zuur Uebung geburtshülflicher Operationen. Jena Z Med Naturwiss. 1864;1:121–3.

    Google Scholar 

  203. Winckel F. Zur operativen Gynäkologie. Arch Gynakol. 1884;23:159–82.

    Google Scholar 

  204. The Society of the Lying-in Hospital of the City of New York. Medical report of the Society of the Lying-in hospital of the city of New York. New York: D. Appleton; 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  205. Jefferson Medical College. Sixty-seventh annual announcement of the Jefferson Medical College of Philadelphia—session of 1891–92. In: College JM, editor; 1891. p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  206. Stedman. Schultze phantom. In: Medical dictionary. 2006. http://www.medilexicon.com/medicaldictionary.php?t=67712.

  207. Schultze BS. Das geburtshülfliche Phantom. Monatsschrift fuer Geburtshilfe und Gynaekologie. 1898;7:244–7.

    Google Scholar 

  208. Bayer H. Das Beckenphantom, ein neues Mittel fur den geburtshilflichen Unterricht. Beitraege zur Geburtshilfliche un Gynaekologie. 1898;1:341–2.

    Google Scholar 

  209. Windler H. königlicher Hofliefant: Hauptkatalog. Berlin; 1912. p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  210. Bumm E. Grundriss zum Studium der Geburtshilfe, in achtundzwanzig Vorlesungen. München: Bergmann; 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  211. Liepmann WG. Das Geburtshilfliche Seminar; praktische Geburtshilfe in zwanzig Vorlesungen für Ärzte und Studierende. Berlin: Hirschwald; 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  212. Zangemeister W. Ein Dammschutzphantom. Verhandlungen der Geselschaft fur Gebortshilfe zu Leipzig in dem Jahre 1903. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel; 1904. p. 20–2.

    Google Scholar 

  213. Shibata K. Obstetrical pocket-phantom. Philadelphia; 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  214. Unknown. Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. BMJ. 1904:785.

    Google Scholar 

  215. Brandt K. Berichte aus Kliniken, Privatanstalten usw. Frommel’s Jahresbericht uber die Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Geburtshilfe und Gynakologie. 1902;15 (Bericht Uber Das Jahr 1901):582.

    Google Scholar 

  216. Libraire C Klincksieck. Catalogue des Dissertations et Écrits Académiques Provenant des Échanges avec les Universités Étrangères et reçus par la Bibliotèque Nationale en 1892; 1894. p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  217. Moore J. Geburtshilfliche Taschen-Phantome, Von Dr. Shibata. Dublin J Med Sci. 1891;92:302–3.

    Google Scholar 

  218. Mueller A. Geburtshilfliches Taschenphantom zur Darstellung des Beckenausgangs-Mechanismus der Kopflagen und der Operationen bei denselben. Munich: J.F. Lehmann; 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  219. Grünwald L. Atlas und Grundriss der Kehlkopfkrankheiten. München: Lehmann; 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  220. DeLee J. The principles and practice of obstetrics; 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  221. Sellheim H. Die Beziehungen des geburtskanales und des Geburtsobjecktes zur Geburtsmechanik. Beiträge zur Geburtshilfe und Gynaekologie. 1907;11:6–125.

    Google Scholar 

  222. Döderlein A. Handbuch der Geburtshilfe. Wiesbaden: Bergmann; 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Liepmann W. Der geburtshilfliche phantomkurs. Berlin: Urban-Schwarzenberg; 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  224. Unknown. Book notices—Der geburtshilfliche Phantomkurs für Ärzte und Studierende. JAMA. 1931;97(22):1647.

    Google Scholar 

  225. Namal A. Gynecologist Ord. Prof. Dr. Wilhelm Gustav Liepmann’s (1878–1939) service process in Istanbul University and his views on social gynecology. Türk Aile Hek Derg. 2008;12(3):153–62.

    Google Scholar 

  226. Copping Corner B, Shippen W. William Shippen, Jr., pioneer in American medical education; a biographical essay. With notes and the original text of Shippin's Student diary, London, 1759-1760, together with a translation of his Edinburgh dissertation, 1761. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  227. Norris G. The early history of medicine in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Private Printing; 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  228. Unknown. Medical literature. North Am Med Surg J. 1827;4:362–86.

    Google Scholar 

  229. Pennsylvania Hospital. Dr John Fothergill. In: History of Pennsylvania Hospital: historical timeline. 2015. http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/paharc/timeline/1751/tline5.html.

  230. Coates B. Brief account of the history and present State of the Pennsylvania Hospital. Phila J Med Phys Sci. 1824;9:30–53.

    Google Scholar 

  231. Gross S. Samuel Bard 1742–1821. Am Med Biogr. 1861.

    Google Scholar 

  232. Garrison F. Samuel Bard and the King’s College School. N Y Acad Med. 1925;1(3):85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  233. Bard S. A compendium of the theory and practice of midwifery. 5th ed. New York: Collins; 1819.

    Google Scholar 

  234. Burr HS. Jonathan Knight and the founding of the Yale School of Medicine. Yale J Biol Med. 1929;1(6):1–343.

    Google Scholar 

  235. The Herkimer County Historical Society. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of the Western District of New York: Obstetric Lectures during 1812. 1997. http://herkimer.nygenweb.net/class.html.

  236. Spalding JA. Dr. Lyman Spalding, the originator of the United States pharmacopia, co-laborer with Dr. Nathan Smith in the founding of the Dartmouth medical school, and its first chemical lecturer, president and professor of anatomy and surgery of the College of physicians and surgeons of the Western district, at Fairfield, N.Y. Boston: W.M. Leonard; 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  237. The College of Physicians & Surgeons. Ordinances of the College of Physicians & Surgeons of the Western District of New York. 1813. http://collections.nlm.nih.gov/ocr/nlm:nlmuid-2554003R-bk.

  238. Edmonson J. American surgical instruments. An Illustrated History of their manufacture and a directory of instrument makers to 1900. San Francisco: Norman; 1997. p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  239. Bedford GS. An address, introductory to a course of lectures: delivered in the hall of the Medical College of South-Carolina, before the trustees and faculty, the students of medicine, and the public generally, at the opening of the session of 1833–4. Charleston: Printed by J.S. Burges; 1833.

    Google Scholar 

  240. Ryan J. Doctor Gunning S Bedford (1806–70) and the search for safe obstetric care, 1833–70. J Med Biogr. 2008;16.

    Google Scholar 

  241. Bedford GS. The principles and practice of obstetrics. New York: Samuel S. & William Wood; 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  242. Harvard University. The Department of Obstetrics—1815. The Harvard Medical School 1782–1906. p. 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  243. Providence Medical Association. The banquet to Dr Ely. Providence Med J. 1906;7(4):135–43.

    Google Scholar 

  244. Bigelow J, Channing W, Ware J, Jackson J, Holmes O, Bigelow H, et al. Practical views on medical education: submitted to the members of the American Medical Association. Boston: D. Clapp; 1850.

    Google Scholar 

  245. Bigelow J, Reynolds E, Storer D, Holmes O. Tremont Street Medical School. Boston Med Surg J. 1840;23(16):264.

    Google Scholar 

  246. Harrington T. The Harvard Medical School—a history, narrative and documentary. New York: Lewis; 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  247. Green R. Dr Charles Montraville Green. Med Hist Regist. 1932;35:25–9.

    Google Scholar 

  248. Cragin E, Edgar J, Green C, Davis E, Williams J, Webster J, et al. Report of the committee of the American Gynecological Society on the present status of obstetrical education in Europe and America and on recommendations for the improvement of obstetrical teaching in America. Am J Obstet Dis Women Child. 1910;62:259–71.

    Google Scholar 

  249. Harvard University. Announcement of the Medical School of Harvard University for 1919–20 with an announcement for 1920–21. Boston: Harvard University; 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  250. Harvard University. Official register of Harvard University—The Medical School 1931–32 with and announcement for 1932–33. Boston: Harvard University; 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  251. University of Michigan, Shaw WB, Donnelly WA. The University of Michigan, an encyclopedic survey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  252. Stander R, Pearse W. Obstetrics, gynecology and the University of Michigan. Privately Published; 1967. p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  253. American Gynecological Society. Transactions of the American Gynecological Society for the Year 1922; 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  254. Davenport HW. Not just any medical school: the science, practice, and teaching of medicine at the University of Michigan, 1850–1941. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  255. Busey SC. Personal reminiscences and recollections of forty-six years’ membership in the Medical Society of the District of Columbia and residence in this city, with biographical sketches of many of the deceased members. Washington: Medical Society of the District of Columbia; 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  256. Warrington J. The Obstetric Institute of Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Printed by H. Evans; 1851. p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  257. Beach W. An improved system of midwifery: adapted to the reformed practice of medicine : illustrated by numerous plates, to which is annexed, a compendium of the treatment of female and infantile diseases, with remarks on physiological and moral elevation. New York: Scribner; 1851.

    Google Scholar 

  258. Wright MB. Difficult labours and their treatment. Am J Med Sci. 1855;30(59):150–3.

    Google Scholar 

  259. University of California. Annual announcement of lectures at Toland Hall, Medical Department of the University of California, San Francisco session of 1875. San Francisco: Cubery; 1875.

    Google Scholar 

  260. University of California. Announcement of the twenty-ninth annual course of lectures of the Medical Department, University of California with catalogue of students and graduates; 1892. p. 10–1.

    Google Scholar 

  261. University of California. Announcement of the nineteenth annual course of lectures of the Medical Department, University of California with catalogue of students and graduates; 1882. p. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  262. Central University. Seventh annual announcement of the Hospital College of Medicine, Louisville, KY—session of 1880–1881; 1880.

    Google Scholar 

  263. Reisman D. Address by David Resiman, MD, President of the Philadelphia County Medical Society to the American Association of Obstetricians, Gynecologists and Abdominal Surgeons, September 19, 1923. Trans Am Assoc Obstet Gynecol Abdom Surg. 1924;36(1923):LX.

    Google Scholar 

  264. Cooper III D, Ledger M. Innovation and traditional at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine: an anecdotal journey. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  265. Polak JO. The history and development of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Long Island Coll Alumni J. 1925;2:4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  266. Dickinson R. Details of a practical course of manikin instruction in obstetrics. N Y Med J. 1892;56:454–8.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Beers K. Notes on Dickinson’s bio. In: The Margaret Sanger papers. 2011. http://editor notes.org/projects/sanger/notes/173/.

  268. Raymond JH. History of the Long Island College Hospital and its graduates: together with the Hoagland Laboratory and the Polhemus Memorial Clinic. Brooklyn: Association of the Alumni; 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  269. Jewett C. Teaching methods in gynecology and obstetrics. Brooklyn Med J. 1905;19(9):337–9.

    Google Scholar 

  270. National Museum of Health and Medicine. US Army Maj. Walter Reed 1893–1902. 2012. http://www.medicalmuseum.mil/index.cfm?p=about.directors.reed.

  271. Holland JW, editor. Teaching obstetrics. Association of American Medical Colleges, 1898 June 6, Denver. Easton: Chemical Publishing; 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  272. Sligh J. Puerperal septicemia. Am J Obstet Dis Women Child. 1892;26(1):171–84.

    Google Scholar 

  273. Crockett M, editor. The developing method in the teaching of medicine. The Association of American Medical Colleges. In: Proceedings of the meeting at Denver, June 6, 1898; 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  274. Williams J, editor. Teaching obstetrics. The Association of American Medical Colleges. In: Proceedings of the meeting at Denver, June 6, 1898; 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  275. Edgar J. The best method of teaching obstetrics and aids in obstetric teaching. New York: D. Appleton; 1896.

    Google Scholar 

  276. Dunn PM. J Clifton Edgar (1859–1939) of New York and his obstetric text. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F441–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  277. Society proceedings: The Obstetrical Society of Philadelphia. An obstetrical manikin. The Medical and Surgical Reporter (Philadelphia). 1889;60:203–5.

    Google Scholar 

  278. Dunn PM. Dr Thomas Radford (1793–1881) of Manchester and obstructed labour. Arch Dis Child. 1993;69:327–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  279. Edgar J. The manikin in the teaching of practical obstetrics. N Y Med J. 1890;52.

    Google Scholar 

  280. Edgar JC. Descriptive and illustrated price list of aids in obstetric teaching. New York: John Reynders; 1896.

    Google Scholar 

  281. Inflation calculator. http://www.davemanuel.com/inflation-calculator.php.

  282. The Society of the Lying-In Hospital of the City of New York. Annual report, 1896.

    Google Scholar 

  283. Engle R. Lying-In Hospital of the City of New York. 1980. http://weill.cornell.edu/archives/history/lying_in_hospital.html?name1=Lying-In+Hospital+of+the+City+of+New+York&type1=2Active.

  284. The Society of the Lying-in hospital of the city of New York. Annual report—The Society of the Lying-In Hospital of the City of New York; 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  285. American Gynecological Society. Album of the fellows of the American Gynecology Society 1876–1900. Philadelphia: W.J. Dornan; 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  286. The Society of the Lying-in hospital of the city of New York. Annual report—The Society of the Lying-In Hospital of the City of New York 1900–1905; 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  287. University of Maryland. Annual circular of the Medical Department of the University of Maryland. Baltimore; 1838.

    Google Scholar 

  288. Codman & Shurtleff. Also for sale. Boston Med Surg J. 1868;1(1):xi.

    Google Scholar 

  289. Royal Gurley. By Royal Gurley—at private sale. The Evening Post; 1840. p. 3. (11 Aug 1840).

    Google Scholar 

  290. Royal Gurley. By Royal Gurley—at private sale. The Evening Post; 1840. p. 3. (3 Sep 1840).

    Google Scholar 

  291. Aylworth B. Inventor manikin for illustrating practice of obstetrics patent US Patent No. 88432; 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  292. Newton R, Morrow P. Am Eclect Med Rev. 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  293. Smith S. Catalogue of Sharp & Smith: importers, manufacturers, wholesale and retail dealers in surgical instruments, deformity apparatus, artificial limbs, artificial eyes, elastic stockings, trusses, crutches, supporters, galvanic and faradic batteries, etc.: surgeon’s appliances of every description. Chicago: Blakely Printing; 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  294. Kny-Scheerer Corporation. Catalog of surgical instruments of superior quality. New York: Kny-Scheerer; 1915. p. 5053–61.

    Google Scholar 

  295. Fist HS. A new fetal manikin for teaching obstetrics. JAMA. 1928;90(21):1707.

    Google Scholar 

  296. Clay-Adams Company. New Adams “OB” phantom. Bull N Y Acad Med Second Ser. 1933;9(10). (Advertisements).

    Google Scholar 

  297. Doherty D. Fractures and other injuries of the child during delivery. Am Gynaecol Obstet J. 1899;15(November).

    Google Scholar 

  298. Edgar J. Enforced first stage of labour: discussion on symposium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1921;1(9):997.

    Google Scholar 

  299. Das K. Midwifery in India. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1923;5(1):99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  300. American Association for Study and Prevention of Infant Mortality. Transactions of the seventh annual meeting—Milwaukee, October 19–21, 1916; 1917. p. 63–5.

    Google Scholar 

  301. The University of the South. Sewanee Calender: catalogue and announcements 1900–1901.

    Google Scholar 

  302. Meigs G, editor. Rural obstetrics. American Association for Study and Prevention of Infant Mortality—transactions of the seventh annual meeting Milwaukee, October 19–21, 1916; 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  303. Lovett L. “Fitter families for future firesides”: Florence Sherbon and popular eugenics. Public Hist. 2007;29(3):66–85.

    Google Scholar 

  304. Chattanooga Medical College. Annual announcement. 1903–04.

    Google Scholar 

  305. Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  306. Beck AH. The Flexner report and the standardization of American Medical Education. JAMA. 2004;291(17):2139–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  307. Cornell University. The register of Cornell University 1909–1910. Ithaca: Cornell University Library; 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  308. Kosmak G, editor. Maternity hospital care. American Association for Study and Prevention of infant mortality—transactions of the fourth annual meeting 1913. Washington; 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  309. Ohio State University. The Ohio State University Bulletin—College of Medicine 1916–1917. Columbus: Ohio State University; 1915. p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  310. Georgetown University. A catalogue of the officers and students of Georgetown University 1911–1912. In: Georgetown University, editor; 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  311. Rodman J, editor. Cooperation in examinations by the National Board of Medical Examiners, State Licensing Boards, and the Medical Schools. In: Proceedings of the twenty ninth annual meeting of the Association of American Medical Colleges, Chicago, 4 Mar 1919; 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  312. Holmes W. The fads and fancies of obstetrics. A comment on the pseudo scientific trend of modern obstetrics. Trans Am Gynaecol Soc. 1921;46:12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  313. Rowland J. Teaching of obstetrics. In: Association of American Medical Colleges—Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting, held at Boston, Massachusetts, 5, 6 and 7 Mar 1925; 1925. p. 82–93.

    Google Scholar 

  314. Antz H. A table for maniken demonstrations. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1920;89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  315. Barnes A. The use of the Dickinson models in obstetric and gynecologic education. J Assoc Am Med Coll. 1947;22(5):261–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  316. Gebhard B. The birth models—R.L. Dickinson’s monument. J Soc Hyg. 1951;37(4):169–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  317. Shenehon E. Cleveland health museum acquires Dickinson models. J Soc Hyg. 1946;32(1):51.

    Google Scholar 

  318. University of Michigan. University of Michigan general register 1929—obstetrics and gynecology; 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  319. Unknown. Review: operative obstetrics on the manikin for students and practitioners by CB Reed. JAMA. 1931;96(20):1724.

    Google Scholar 

  320. McNeile LG. Obstetrical manikin practice. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  321. Bonney V. Discussion on the teaching of obstetrics. Proc R Soc Med. 1932;25(10):1553–66.

    Google Scholar 

  322. Ayers H, Mussio J. Obstetrical maneuvers on the Ayers Manikin (1943). United States educational scientific and cultural motion pictures and filmstrips—suitable and available for use abroad. 2nd ed. Washington: Dept of State; 1952. p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  323. Ayers H, Mussio J. Obstetrical maneuvers on the Ayers Manikin—1943—review. Can Med Assoc J. 1958;79:676.

    Google Scholar 

  324. Wakerlin R, Whitacre F. Transparent manikin for teaching obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1952;64(6):1378–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  325. Gaumard. About us. 2015. http://www.gaumardscientific.com/about.

  326. Thiery M. Wie is de uitvinder van het verloskundig fantoom? Sci Hist. 1992;18:109–21.

    Google Scholar 

  327. Van Bortel T. Climbing up the medical ladder: the Surgeon–Accoucheur Jan Bernard Jacobs (1734–1790). Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107:228–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  328. Ossieur E. J.B. Jacobs, Chirurgin, Verkloskundige en Auteur (1734–1790); 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  329. Plenck J. Elementa Artis Obstetriciae; 1797.

    Google Scholar 

  330. Sanchez Ortiz A, Del Moral N, Mico S. Entre La Cienca y el Arte. Ceroplastica Anatomica para el real Colegio de Cirugia de San Carlos (1786–1805). Archivo Español de Arte. 2012;85(340):329–49.

    Google Scholar 

  331. Ruiz-Berdún D, Gomis A. Modelos Para la Enseñanza de la Obstetricia a lo Largo de la Historia. Enseñanza e Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas Orientación, Metodologías y Perspectivas; 2014. p. 121–34.

    Google Scholar 

  332. Gil C. De que manera se dabe ensenar y se debe aprendar la Obstetricia. Revista ibero-americana de ciencias medicas. 1907;18:445–60.

    Google Scholar 

  333. Universidad de Grenada. La Enseñanza de la Obstetricia y Ginecología en la Universidad de Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  334. Ayres de Campos D. Simulation-based training in obstetrics and gynaecology. Monograph; 2012. p. 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  335. Gryglewski R. Rafael Joseph Czerwiakowski the father of Polish surgery. Vesalius. 2004;10(1):35–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  336. Brauer W. Polskie piśmiennictwo położnicze XVIII Wieku. Archiwum Historji I Filozofjt Medycyny Oraz Historji Nauk Przyrodniczych. 1933;13:215–31.

    Google Scholar 

  337. Wikipedia. Modelo-de-quadril. 2007. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Modelo-de-quadril.jpg.

  338. Leon N. La obstetricia en Mexico; 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  339. Rodriguez E. El drama de las posiciones occípito-posteriores de vértice. Ginecolgia y Obstetricia de Mexico. 2012;80(9):625–9.

    Google Scholar 

  340. Craig C. SAMJ forum—in memoriam—Patricia Massey. South Afr Med J. 2004;94(7).

    Google Scholar 

  341. Pink Tentacle. 19th century pregnancy dolls. Pink Tentacle. 2009. http://pinktentacle.com/2009/05/pregnant-dolls-from-edo-period-japan/.

  342. Wilson A. The making of man-midwifery: childbirth in England, 1660–1770. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  343. von Siebold E. Versuch einer Geschichte der Geburtshülfe; 1839.

    Google Scholar 

  344. Beuvalet-Boutouyrie S. La sage-femme en chef: véritable directrice de la Maternité de Port-Royal au XIXe siècle; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  345. Unknown. The history of Paris from the earliest period to the present day: containing a description of its antiquities, public buildings, civil, religious, scientific, and commercial institutions. London: G.B. Whittaker/A. and W. Galignani; 1827.

    Google Scholar 

  346. Hebammenschule AfGH. Hebammenschule am Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg. 2015. http://afg-heidelberg.de/schulen/hebammenschule/.

  347. Gelbert NR. The king’s midwife: a history and mystery of Madame du Coudray. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  348. Lachapelle ML, Dugès A. Pratique des Accouchemens: ou mémoires, et observations choisies. Paris: Baillière; 1821.

    Google Scholar 

  349. LaChappelle ML. Pratique des Accouchemens, ou Memoires, et Observations Choisies. Paris: J.B. Baillière; 1825.

    Google Scholar 

  350. Blunt J. Man-midwifery dissected; or, the obstetric family instructor. London: Samuel William Fores; 1793.

    Google Scholar 

  351. Bruchhausen W. Akademische Hebammenlehrer in Bonn: Vom kurfürstlichen Leibarzt zum preussichen Professor (1777–1828). Geschichte der Pflege. 2012;1:13–8.

    Google Scholar 

  352. Trusler J. The London adviser and guide. 2nd ed. London: The Author; 1790.

    Google Scholar 

  353. Ferguson N. The ascent of money: a practical history of the world. New York: Penguin Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  354. Stofft H. L’école des sages-femmes de Morlaix à fin du règne de Louis XV et sous le règne de Louis XVI. Hist Sci Med. 1983;17(1):41–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  355. Fosseyeux M. L’Hotel-Dieu de Paris au XVIIe et au XVIIIe Siecle. Paris; 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  356. Le BousierDu Coudray A. Abbrégé de l’art des accouchemens: dans lequel on donne les préceptes nécessaires pour le mettre heureusement en pratique; 1769.

    Google Scholar 

  357. Société archéologique de Touraine. Les Chirugiens Démonstrateurs. Bulletin et Mémoires de la Société Archéologique de Touraine; 1909. p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  358. Stephen M. Domestic midwife or, the best means of preventing danger in child birth, considered. London: Printed by S. W. Fores; 1795.

    Google Scholar 

  359. Unknown. Domestic midwife; or, the best means of preventing danger in child-birth, considered by Margaret Stephens. Crit Rev. 1797;20:351–2.

    Google Scholar 

  360. Thompson W. Training-schools for nurses, with notes on twenty-two schools. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons; 1883.

    Google Scholar 

  361. Goodnow M. Outlines of nursing history. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  362. Lingrand. Odontiana. L’Art Dentaire. 1890;34(12):287–93.

    Google Scholar 

  363. Marland H, Rafferty A. How to be a midwife in late nineteenth-century Spain. Midwives, society and childbirth: debates and controversies in the modern period. London: Routledge; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  364. Gomez TO. Midwives and the transmission of scientific knowledge on births in 19th century Spain. Arenal. 1999;6:55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  365. Quiroz L. De la comadrona a la obstetriz. Nacimiento y apogeo de la profesión de partera titulada en el Perú del siglo XIX. Dynamis. 2012;32(2):415–37.

    Google Scholar 

  366. Cadeau de Fessel B. Curso Elemental de Partos; 1827.

    Google Scholar 

  367. Barreto MRN. Assisted birth in 19th century Bahia. História, Ciências, Saúde –Manguinhos. 2008;15(4):901–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  368. Tiaki K. Business conducted at meeting of nurses and midwives registration board. J Nurs N Z. 1929;22(3):110.

    Google Scholar 

  369. Ettinger L. Nurse-midwifery: the birth of a new American profession. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  370. Graves J. Mother manikin for teaching approved practice of obstetrics and midwifery patent US Patent No. 2,551,560; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  371. Klautsch M. Accouchement apparatus for instruction patent US Patent No. 451675; 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  372. Jacobs JB. Apparatus for teaching obstetrics patent US Patent No. 2,127,774; 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  373. Graves J. Educational apparatus for teaching obstetrics and midwifery patent US Patent No. 2551433; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  374. Graves J. The fate of “Miss Chase”, the obstetrical mannequin. 1956. https://www.floridaemory.com/exhibits/medicine/documents.php?id=132.

  375. Thomas TG, Mundé PF. A practical treatise on the disease of women. 5th ed., enl. and thoroughly rev. Containing two hundred and sixty-six engravings on wood. Philadelphia: H. C. Lea’s Son; 1880.

    Google Scholar 

  376. University of Vermont. Announcement and catalogue of the annual winter course of instruction of the Medical Department. Session of 1885–1886; 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  377. University of Vermont. Thirty-ninth annual announcement of the Medical Department of the University of Vermont and State Agricultural College. For the Year 1892; 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  378. Reynders J. John Reynders & Co’s illustrated catalogue and price list of surgical instruments spectacles, eyeglasses, optical goods, orthopaedical apparatus, trusses, supporters, etc., etc. 6th ed. New York: John Reynders; 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  379. Fritsch. A German review of the gynaecology and midwifery of the last quarter of a century. Br Gynaecol J. 1900;16:68.

    Google Scholar 

  380. Parvin T. Winckel’s diseases of women: a handbook for physicians and students. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston Son; 1887. p. xii–xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  381. Parvin T. Sexual organs of a young girl (society proceedings: obstetrical society of Philadelphia, meeting January 3rd 1889). Med Surg Rep (Philadelphia). 1889;60:108.

    Google Scholar 

  382. Washington University. Quarterly bulletin—Medical Department of Washington University. Medicine and surgery—gynecology; 1905. p. 229–30.

    Google Scholar 

  383. Vulliet F, Lutaud A. Leçons de gynécologie opératoire. Paris: Baillière; 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  384. Eulenburg A. Uterus. Real-Encyclopädie der gesamten Heilkunde. Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  385. Kynoch JAC. VIth international congress of obstetrics and gynaecology. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1912;22(5):295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  386. Blumreich L. Der Gynäkologische untersuchungskursus am natürlichen phantom: als ergänzung und ersatz der untersuchungsübungen an der lebenden, vol. 12. Wiesbaden: J.F. Bergmann; 1913. p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  387. Jacobs. Le Nouveau Fantome de Blumreich. Revue de gynecologie et de chirurgie abdominale. 1913;21(2):129–46.

    Google Scholar 

  388. Honan J. Honan’s handbook to medical Europe: a ready reference book to the universities, hospitals, clinics, laboratories and general medical work of the principle cities of Europe. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston’s Son; 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  389. Knapp L. Geburtshilfliche Propädeutik; ein Leitfaden zur Einführung in das Studium der Geburtshilfe. Wien: Braumüller; 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  390. Knapp L. Ein gynäkologisch Demonstrations- und Übungsphantom II. Centralblatt fur Gynäkologie. 1902;12:306–10.

    Google Scholar 

  391. Baisch K, Bovin, Brandt K, Bubckhard G, Franz EF, Fbeund HW et al. Jahresbericht Ober die Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Geburtshilfe und Gynaekologie. Wiesbaden; 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  392. V. Mueller & Co Chicago. Makers of surgical Instruments; 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  393. Baumm P. Ein Uterusphantom zur Darstellung des Geburtsvorganges. Monatsschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Gynakologie. 1898;8(6):624–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Owen, H. (2016). Simulation in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Midwifery. In: Simulation in Healthcare Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26577-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26577-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26575-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26577-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics