Skip to main content

Science and Values

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Science for Scientists

Part of the book series: Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy ((SUTP))

  • 205k Accesses

Abstract

The concepts value-free and value-laden are introduced and clearly distinguished. It is argued that science could and should be value-free, while it is by necessity value-laden.

The feminist critique that some research is driven by more or less hidden assumptions devaluating women is briefly discussed and exemplified. Another feminist critique, that concept formation is gender biased and tacitly presupposes that modern western cultural traits are universal biological traits, is also discussed. Finally, the core norms in research ethics are presented.

Where I benefit, that is where I place my faith.

Proverb

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Weber (2011). For a thorough discussion of Weber’s position on this matter, see Bruun (2007).

  2. 2.

    Quine’s hostiliy to the distinction between essential and contingent properties is that it depends on how we describe things and most things can be described in many ways. So the distinction is not objective, it varies depending on which the description the speaker thinks most appropriate.

Further Reading

  • APA-code: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf

  • Bruun, H. H. (2007). Science, values and politics in Max Weber’s methodology: New expanded edition. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1973). The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science (pp. 267–278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2011). Methodology of social sciences. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johansson, LG. (2016). Science and Values. In: Philosophy of Science for Scientists. Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26551-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics