Skip to main content

A Computational Model of Match Decision-Making Problem Using Spiking SHESN with Reward-Modulated Reinforcement Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2015)

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2092 Accesses

Abstract

Match decision-making problem is one of the hot topics in the field of computational neuroscience. In this paper, we propose a spiking SHESN model with reward-modulated reinforcement learning so as to conduct computational modeling and prediction of such an open problem in a manner that has more neurophysiological characteristics. Neural coding of two sequentially-presented stimuli is read out from a collection of clustered neural populations in state reservoir through reward-modulated reinforcement learning. To evaluate match decision-making performance of our computational model, we set up three kinds of test datasets with different spike timing trains and present a criterion of maximum correlation coefficient for assessing whether match/nonmatch decision-making is successful or not. Finally, extensive experimental results show that the proposed model has strong robustness on interval of both spike timings and spike shift, which is consistent with monkey’s behavior records exhibited in match decision-making experiment [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Qi, X.L., Meyer, T., Stanford, T.R., Constantinidis, C.: Neural correlates of a decision variable before learning to perform a match/nonmatch task. J. Neurosci. 32(18), 6161–6169 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerstner, W., Kistler, W.: Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Caporale, N., Dan, Y.: Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a hebbian learning rule. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 25–46 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wills, T.J., Lever, C., Cacucci, F., Burgess, N., O’Keefe, J.: Attractor dynamics in the hippocampal representation of the local environment. Science 308(5723), 873–876 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaeger, H.: The “echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks - with an erratum note. German National Research Center for Information Technology GMD Technical report 48 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jaeger, H., Haas, H.: Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless telecommunication. Science 304(5667), 78–80 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smolinski, T.G., Prinz, A.A.: Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for model neuron parameter value selection matching biological behavior under different simulation scenarios. BMC Neurosci. 10(Suppl. 1), P260 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krimm, R.F., Hill, D.L.: Neuron/target matching between chorda tympani neurons and taste buds during postnatal rat development. J. Neurobiol. 43(1), 98–106 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deng, Z.D., Zhang, Y.: Collective behavior of a small-world recurrent neural system with scale-free distribution. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 18(5), 1364–1375 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaeger, H., Lukoševičius, M., Popovici, D., Siewert, U.: Optimization and applications of echo state networks with leaky-integrator neurons. Neural Netw. 20(3), 335–352 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Legenstein, R., Chase, S.M., Schwartz, A.B., Maass, W.: A reward-modulated hebbian learning rule can explain experimentally observed network reorganization in a brain control task. J. Neurosci. 30(25), 8400–8410 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dayan, P., Abbott, L.F.: Theoretical neuroscience: computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15(1), 154–155 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Nos. 91420106, 90820305, and 60775040.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhidong Deng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deng, Z., Yang, G. (2015). A Computational Model of Match Decision-Making Problem Using Spiking SHESN with Reward-Modulated Reinforcement Learning. In: Arik, S., Huang, T., Lai, W., Liu, Q. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26532-2_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26532-2_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26531-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26532-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics