Advertisement

Email Personalization and User Profiling Using RANSAC Multi Model Response Regression Based Optimized Pruning Extreme Learning Machines and Gradient Boosting Trees

  • Lavneet SinghEmail author
  • Girija Chetty
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9489)

Abstract

Email personalization is the process of customizing the content and structure of email according to member’s specific and individual needs taking advantage of member’s navigational behavior. Personalization is a refined version of customization, where marketing is done automated on behalf of customer’s user’s profiles, rather than customer requests on his own behalf. There is very thin line between customization and personalization which is achieved by leveraging customer level information using analytical tools. E-commerce is growing fast, and with this growth companies are willing to spend more on improving the online experience.

Thus, in this study, we propose a new architectural design of email personalization and user profiling using gradient boost trees and optimized pruned extreme learning machines as base estimators. We also conducted an in-depth data analysis to find each member’s behavior and important attributes which plays a significant role in increasing click rates in personalized emails. From the experimental validation, we concluded that our prosed method works much better in predicting customer’s behavior on deals send in personalized emails compared to other methods in past literature.

Keywords

Email personalization Gradient boosting Optimized pruning extreme learning machines 

References

  1. 1.
    Montgomery, A.L., Smith, M.D.: Prospects for personalization on the internet. J. Interact. Mark. 23(2), 130–137 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maxwell, J.C.: A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, vol. 2, 3rd edn, pp. 68–73. Clarendon, Oxford (1892)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ansari, S., Kohavi, R., Mason, L., Zheng, Z.: Integrating e-commerce and data mining: architecture and challenges. In: ICDM 2001 Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2001, pp. 27–34. IEEE (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmitt, E., Manning, H., Paul, Y., Roshan, S.: Commerce software takes off. Forrester report, March 2000Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmitt, E., Manning, H., Paul, Y., Tong, J.: Measuring web success. Forrester report, November 1999Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miceli, G., Ricotta, F., Costabile, M.: Customizing customization: a conceptual framework for interactive personalization. J. Interact. Mark. 21(2), 6–25 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Venasen, J.: What is personalization? A conceptual framework. Eur. J. Mark. 41(5–6), 409–418 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mobasher, B., Cooley, R., Srivastava, J.: Automatic personalization based on web usage mining. Commun. ACM 43(8), 142–151 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srivastava, J., Cooley, R., Deshpande, M., Tan, P.N.: Web usage mining: discovery and applications of usage patterns from web data. SIGKDD Explor. 1(2), 12–23 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eirinaki, M., Vazirgiannis, M.: Web mining for web personalization. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 3(1), 1–27 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montgomery, A.L., Li, S., Srinivasan, K., Liechty, J.: Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Mark. Sci. 23(4), 579–595 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friedman, J.H.: Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine, February 1999Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.H.: Boosting and additive trees (Chap. 10). In: The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd edn. pp. 337–384. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-84857-6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., Siew, C.-K.: Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70(1–3), 489–501 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abid, S., Fnaiech, F., Najim, M.: A fast feedforward training algorithm using a modified form of the standard backpropagation algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 12(2), 424–430 (2001). doi: 10.1109/72.914537 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh, L., Chetty, G.: Pruned annular extreme learning machine optimization based on RANSAC multi model response regularization. In: Mao, K., Cambria, E., Cao, J., Man, Z., Toh, K.-A. (eds.) Proceedings of ELM-2014 Volume 1. PALO, vol. 3, pp. 163–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh, L., Chetty, G.: An optimal approach for pruning annular regularized extreme learning machines. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW), pp. 80–87, 14 December 2014Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh, L., Chetty, G.: RANSAC multi model response regression based pruned extreme learning machines for multiclass problems. Australian Journal of Intelligent Information Processing Systems 14(1) (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh, L., Chetty, G.: Understanding the brain via fMRI classification. In: Kasabov, N. (ed.) Springer Handbook of Bio-/Neuroinformatics, pp. 703–711. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ESTEMUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations