Skip to main content

Does My Bias Look Big in This?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Research Involving Pregnant Women

Part of the book series: Research Ethics Forum ((REFF,volume 3))

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are thought to be the gold standard in evidence. This review of their origins and adoption, highlights commonly ignored shortcomings with RCTs. If RCTs are used indiscriminately, their adverse effects may outweigh their benefits. This chapter focuses on antidepressants and how RCTs give the wrong message about safety, efficacy, and effectiveness. The arguments hold true in principle for all treatments, including all treatments for pregnant women. The received wisdom since thalidomide, that we should rarely if ever use drugs in pregnancy, increasingly is being eroded by arguments in support of the use of RCTs. In the case of antidepressants, this has made them among the most commonly prescribed drugs in pregnancy.

There is a presumption that objectivity comes from the procedures of an RCT. We argue that objectivity comes from collective scrutiny of publicly available data and, in the case of pregnancy, this mandates the creation of pregnancy registries to generate sound evidence on the basis of which to make treatment decisions for pregnant women and women of child-bearing years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a discussion of licensing in the face of inadequate, contested data see Healy’s discussion of a decision to license Zoloft on the basis of ghost-written publications stemming from these two positive RCTs, when there were ten or more negative RCTs (Healy 2012).

  2. 2.

    Data available upon request from David Healy.

References

  • Ballantyne, A., and W. Rogers. 2016. Pregnancy, vulnerability, and the risk of exploitation in clinical research. In Clinical research involving pregnant women, eds. F. Baylis and A. Ballantyne, 139–159. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylis, F., and R. MacQuarrie. 2016. Why physicians and women should want pregnant women included in clinical trials. In Clinical research involving pregnant women, eds. F. Baylis and A. Ballantyne, 17–31. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. 2010. Rosiglitazone. What went wrong? BMJ 341: c4848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. 2013. European drugs agency clashes with scientists over safety of GLP-1 drugs. BMJ 347: f4838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, E.B. (ed.). 1964. Depression: Proceedings of the symposium held at Cambridge, 22–26 September 1959. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D., S. Doucette, K. Cranley-Glass, S. Shapiro, D. Healy, P. Hebert, and B. Hutton. 2005. The association between suicide attempts and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 330(7488): 396–399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1935. The design of experiments. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Z. Swijtink, T. Porter, L. Daston, J. Beatty, and L. Kruger. 1990. The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GlaxoSmithKline, 2006. Paroxetine adult suicidality analysis. GlaxoSmithKline. Updated 5 April 2006; originally cited 8 August 2007. On file with and available from the authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagnell, O., J. Lanke, and B. Rorsman. 1981. Suicide rates in the Lundby study: Mental illness as a risk factor for suicide. Neuropsychobiology 7(5): 248–253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D. 1998. The antidepressant era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D. 2012. Pharmageddon. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A.B. 1966. Reflections on controlled trial. Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 25(2): 107–133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kukla, R. 2016. Equipoise, uncertainty, and inductive risk in research involving pregnant women. In Clinical research involving pregnant women, eds. F. Baylis and A. Ballantyne, 179–196. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langston, L. 2016. Better safe than sorry: Risk, stigma, and research during pregnancy. In Clinical research involving pregnant women, eds. F. Baylis and A. Ballantyne, 33–50. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna, L. 1960. Thalidomide – A new non-barbiturate sleep-inducing drug. Journal of Chronic Diseases 11(6): 627–631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lasagna, L. 1998. Back to the future. Evaluation and drug development. In The psychopharmacologists, vol. 2, ed. D. Healy, 135–166. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H.M. 1997. The progress of experiment: Science and therapeutic reform in the United States, 1900–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council. 1948. Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. BMJ 2(4582): 769–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffle, A., and M. Gray. 2007. Screening: Evidence and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J. 1976. On rereading R.A. Fisher. The Annals of Statistics 4(3): 441–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teicher, M.H., C. Glod, and J.O. Cole. 1990. Emergence of intense suicidal preoccupation during fluoxetine treatment. The American Journal of Psychiatry 147(2): 107–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, B. 1998. Clinical trials in British medicine 1858–1948, with special reference to the development of the randomised controlled trial. Bristol University PhD dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkes, R.J., R.C. Van der Mast, M.W. Hengeveld, J.P. Tuyl, A.H. Zwindermann, and G.M. Van Kempen. 1998. Reduction by paroxetine of suicidal behavior in patients with repeated suicide attempts but not major depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry 155(4): 543–547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Women’s Health Initiative (Writing group for the Womens’ Health Initiative Investigators). 2002. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(3): 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Healy MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Healy, D., Mangin, D. (2016). Does My Bias Look Big in This?. In: Baylis, F., Ballantyne, A. (eds) Clinical Research Involving Pregnant Women. Research Ethics Forum, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26512-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26512-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26510-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26512-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics