Abstract
Emergence is a word that plays a central role in the natural or manifest image of the world, within which we organize our ordinary knowledge. Even though some interpretations of the “scientific image” leave no place for emergence, sciences increasingly made use of this word. But many philosophical arguments have been made against the consistence or validity of this concept. This chapter presents a computational view of emergence, alternative to the usual combinatorial view common among philosophers, that is formulated in terms of parts and wholes. It shows that computational emergence can be characterized in terms of causation, and that a subclass of computationally emergent processes displays many of the connotations of the scientific use of the term. After having so captured a concept of emergence, I turn to the question of applying the concept and testing whether some instantiations exist.
This work has been funded by the Project ‘Explabio’, ANR # 13-BSH3-0007.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is a question left open here – it’s enough to point that, following Kim, many philosophical approaches of emergence concern the emergence of properties, even if physicists like Laughlin (2005) talk of the emergence of laws. I argued (Huneman 2008b) that one should first of all speak of emergent processes instead of emergence of properties, these ones being emergent only in a derivative way.
- 2.
See Roe 1981 on the entanglement of spontaneous generation idea with controversies over generation.
- 3.
Idea that any physical fact or event has a cause which is also physical – notwithstanding what other facts or causes may exist. This postulate is supposed to be inherent to modern science.
- 4.
See Atay and Jost 2004, 18.
- 5.
Also Bechtel and Richardson 1992.
- 6.
See also Bar Yam (2004).
- 7.
- 8.
Demonstration in Huneman 2008b.
- 9.
- 10.
For emergence in ABM according to my criteria, see R. Wilson 2010.
- 11.
A more precise description of levels of counterfactual dependency, defining modes of regularity and prediction, is done in Huneman (2012).
References
Anderson, P.W.: More is different: broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure of science. Science 177, 393–396 (1972)
Atay, F., Jost, J.: On the emergence of complex systems on the basis of the coordination of complex behaviors of their elements. Complexity 10(1), 17–22 (2004)
Bar Yam, Y.: A mathematical theory of strong emergence using multiscale variety. Complexity 9(6), 15–24 (2004)
Bechtel, W., Richardson, R.: Emergent phenomena and complex systems. In: Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., Kim, J. (eds.) Emergence or Reduction? pp. 257–287. de Gruyter, Berlin (1992)
Bedau, M.: Weak emergence. In: Tomberlin, J. (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives: Mind, Causation, and World, vol. 11, pp. 375–399. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1997)
Bedau, M.: Is weak emergence just in the mind? Mind. Mach. 18, 443–459 (2008)
Bedau, M., Humphreys, P.: Emergence. Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)
Burke, M., Furnier, G., Prasad, K.: The emergence of local norms in networks. Complexity 11(5), 65–83 (2006)
Buss, S., Papadimitriou, C., Tsisiklis, J.: On the predictability of coupled automata: an allegory about chaos. Complex Syst. 5, 525–539 (1992)
Chalmers, D.: Strong and weak emergence. In: Clayton, P., Davies, P. (eds.) The Re-emergence of Emergence, pp. 244–256. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Churchland, P.M.: Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. J. Philos. 78, 67–90 (1981)
Corning, P.: The re-emergence of “emergence”: a venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity 7(6), 18–30 (2002)
Crane, T.: The significance of emergence. In: Gillett, C., Loewer, B. (eds.) Physicalism and Its Discontents, pp. 207–224. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Crutchfield, J., Hanson, J.: Turbulent pattern bases for cellular automata. Phys. D 69, 279–301 (1993)
Crutchfield, J., Hanson, J.: Computational mechanics of cellular automata: an example. Phys. D 103, 169–189 (1997)
Crutchfield, J., Shalizi, C.: Pattern Discovery and Computational Mechanics. arXiv:cs/0001027v1 (2001)
Descola, P.: Par-delà nature et culture. Gallimard, Paris (2005)
Dessalles, J.L., Phan, D.: Emergence in multi-agent systems: cognitive hierarchy, detection, and complexity reduction. In: Mathieu, P., Beaufils, B., Brandouy, O. (eds.) Artificial economics. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol. 564, pp. 147–159. Springer, Berlin/New York (2005)
Epstein, J.: Modeling civil violence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99(3), 7243–7250 (2002)
Epstein, J.: Agent-based computational models and generative social science. In: Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling, pp. 4–46. Princeton University Press, Princeton ([1999] 2007)
Gardner, M.: The fantastic combinations of John Conway's new solitaire game “life”. Sci Am 223, 120–123 (1970)
Gilbert, N.: Varieties of emergence. Paper presented at the Social Agents: Ecology, Exchange, and Evolution Conference, Chicago. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/staff/ngilbert/ngpub/paper148_NG.pdf (2002)
Hall, N., Paul, D.: Causation and Counterfactuals. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Hanson, J., Crutchfield, J.: Computational mechanics of cellular automata: an example. Phys. D 103, 169–189 (1997)
Holland, J.: Hidden Order. How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Addison-Wesley, New York (1995)
Holland, J.: Emergence. From Chaos to Order. Basic Books, New York (1998)
Hovda, P.: Quantifying weak emergence. Mind. Mach. 18, 461–473 (2008)
Humphreys, P.: How properties emerge. Philos. Sci. 64, 53–70 (1997)
Humphreys, P.: Synchronic and diachronic emergence. Mind. Mach. 18, 431–442 (2008)
Huneman, P.: Combinatorial vs. computational views of emergence: emergence made ontological? Philos. Sci. 75, 595–607 (2008a)
Huneman, P.: Emergence and adaptation. Mind. Mach. 18, 493–520 (2008b)
Huneman, P.: Computer sciences meet evolutionary biology: issues in gradualism. In: Torres, J.L., Pombo, O., Symons, J., Rahman, S. (eds.) Special Sciences and the Unity of Science, pp. 200–225. Springer, Dordrecht (2011)
Huneman, P.: Determinism and predictability: lessons from computational emergence. Synthese 185(2), 195–214 (2012)
Huneman, P.: Mapping an expanding territory: computer simulations in evolutionary biology. Hist. Philos. Life Sci. 36(1), 60–89 (2014)
Israeli, N., Goldenfeld, N.: On computational irreducibility and the predictability of complex physical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 074105 (2004)
Jonas, J.: The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. Harper & Row, New York (1966)
Kant, I.: Critique of Judgment. Hackett, Indianapolis (1987 [1790])
Kim, J.: Making sense of emergence. Philos. Stud. 95, 3–36 (1999)
Klee, R.: Microdeterminisms and concepts of emergence. Philos. Sci. 51, 44–63 (1984)
Kuorikoski, J., Lehtinen, A., Marchionni, C.: Robustness analysis disclaimer: please read the manual before use! Biol. Philos. 27, 891–902 (2012)
Langton, C.: Artificial life. In: Langton, C. (ed.) Artificial Life. SFI studies in the sciences of complexity, Proc. Vol. VI. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City (1989)
Laughlin, R.: A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down. Basic Books, New York (2005)
Laughlin, R.B., Pines, D., Schmalian, J., Stojkovi, B., Wolynes, P.: The middle way. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97(1), 32–37 (2000)
Levins, R.: The strategy of model building in population biology. In: Sober, E. (ed.) Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, 1st edn, pp. 18–27. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1966)
Lewis, D.: Causation. J. Philos. 70, 556–567 (1973)
Lipton, P.: Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge, London (1991)
Matthewson, J., Weisberg, M.: The structure of trade-offs in model building. Synthese 170(1), 169–190 (2009)
Mc Laughlin, B.: The rise and fall of British emergentism. In: Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., Kim, J. (eds.) Emergence or Reduction? de Gruyter, Berlin (1992)
Nagel, K., Rasmussen, K.: Traffic at the edge of chaos. In: Brooks, R. (ed.) Artificial Life IV. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1994)
Nagel, T.: What is it like to be a Bat? Philos. Rev. 83(4), 435–450 (1974)
O’Connor, T.: Emergent properties. Am. Philos. Q. 31, 91–104 (1994)
Orzack, S.H., Sober, E.: A critical assessment of Levins’s the strategy of model building in population biology (1966). Q. Rev. Biol. 68, 533–546 (1993)
Piaget, J.: La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Delachaux et Niestlé, Paris (1937)
Rasmussen, S., Baas, N., Mayer, B., Nilsson, M., Olesen, M.: Ansatz for dynamical hierarchies. Artif. Life 7(4), 329–353 (2002)
Roe, S.A.: Matter, Life, Generation. Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)
Salzberg, C., Antony, A., Sayama, H.: Genetic diversification and adaptation of self-replicators discovered in simple cellular automata. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Humans and Computers (HC-2003), pp. 194–199. University of Aizu, Aizuwakamatsu (2003)
Sayama, H.: Spontaneous evolution of self reproducing loops in cellular automata. In: Bar-Yam, Y., Minai, A.A. (eds.) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems Volume II: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Complex Systems, pp. 363–374. Westview Press (1998)
Schelling, T.: Models of segregation. Am. Econ. Rev. 59(2), 488–493 (1969)
Seager, W.: Emergence and efficacy. In: Erneling, C., Johnson, D. (eds.) The Mind as a Scientific Object Between Brain and Culture, pp. 176–192. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Sellars, W.: Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In: Colodny, R. (ed.) Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, pp. 35–78. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (1962)
Shalizi, C., Haslinger, R., Rouquier, J.B., Klinkner, C., Moore, C.: Automatic filters for the detection of coherent structures in spatiotemporal systems. ArXiv CG/0508001 (2006)
Silberstein, M.: Reduction, emergence and explanation. In: Silberstein, M., Machamer, P. (eds.) Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science, pp. 80–107. Blackwell, Oxford (2002)
Tassier, T.: A model of fads, fashions and group formations. Complexity 9(5), 51–61 (2004)
Weisberg, M.: Robustness analysis. Philos. Sci. 73, 730–742 (2006)
Wilson, J.: Non-reductive physicalism and degrees of freedom. Br. J. Philos. Sci 61(2), 279–311 (2010a)
Wilson, R.: The third way of agent-based social simulation and a computational account of emergence. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul 13(3), 8 (2010b). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/13/3/8.html
Wimsatt, W.: False models as means to truer theories. In: Nitecki, N., Hoffman, A. (eds.) Neutral Models in Biology, pp. 23–55. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)
Wimsatt, W.: Aggregation: reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philos. Sci. 64, S372–S384 (1997)
Wolfe, C., Normandin, S.: Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science, 1800–2010. Springer, Dordrecht (2013)
Woodward, J.: Making Things Happen. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huneman, P. (2016). Does Emergence Also Belong to the Scientific Image? Elements of an Alternative Theoretical Framework Towards an Objective Notion of Emergence. In: Redmond, J., Pombo Martins, O., Nepomuceno Fernández, Á. (eds) Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26506-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26506-3_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26504-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26506-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)