Skip to main content

Abstract

Seismic reflection events are caused by the impedance contrasts at layer interfaces having a minimum width (Fresnel Zone). Seismic studies to represent reliably the subsurface geology, require quality data, which depend on signal-to-noise ratio and resolution, the latter being the ability to image thin geologic features separately. This calls for a seismic broad-bandwidth source consisting of both low and high frequencies that can improve resolution limits to layer thicknesses.

Seismic reflections record attributes such as amplitude, phase, polarity, arrival time and velocity that can be measured or estimated. The attributes define the shape and arrival time of reflection waveforms which depend on rock properties. Estimation of rock properties from seismic waveforms and their vertical and lateral changes in time and space is the essence of seismic interpretation.

Appropriate choice of seismic display modes and plotting scales are also important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anstey AN (1977) Seismic interpretation- the physical aspects, records of short course the new seismic interpreter. IHRDC of Boston, Massachusettes, 2–109 to 2-111A, 3–1 to 3–19 & 3–65 to 3–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement WA (1977) A case history of geoseismic modeling of basal Morrow- Springer sandstone. AAPG Mem 26:451–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey JP (1989) The Fresnel zone and its interpretive significance. Lead Edge 8:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meckel LD Jr, Nath AK (1977) Geologic consideration for stratigraphic modeling and interpretation. AAPG Mem 26:417–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheriff RE (1977) Limitations of resolution of seismic reflections and geologic detail derivable from them. AAPG Mem 26:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Bancroft JC (2001) How much does the migration aperture actually contribute to the migration result? CREWS Res Rep 13:573–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Vail PR, Todd RG, Sangree JB (1977) Chronostratigraphic significance of seismic reflections. AAPG Mem 26:99–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Widess MB (1973) How thin is thin bed? Geophysics 38:1176–1180

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nanda, N.C. (2016). Seismic Reflection Principles: Basics. In: Seismic Data Interpretation and Evaluation for Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26491-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics