Is There a Role for Computation in the Enactive Paradigm?
The main contribution of this paper is a naturalized account of the phenomenon of computation. The key idea for the development of this account is the identification of the notion of syntactical processing (or information processing) with the dynamical evolution of a constrained physical process, based on the observation that both evolve according to an arbitrary set of rules. This identification, in turn, revealed that, from the physical point of view, computation could be understood in terms of the operation of a component subdivided into two parts, (a) the constrained process and (b) the constraints that control its dynamics, where the interactions with the rest of the system are mediated by configurational changes of the constrained process. The immediate consequence of this analysis is the observation that this notion of computation can be readily integrated into the enactive paradigm of cognition.
KeywordsEnaction Computation Syntax Arbitrariness Computation Varela Organism Searle
- Ashby, R. (1958). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- Bickhard, M. (2000). Autonomy, function and representation. Communication and Cognition – Artificial Intelligence, 17, 111–131.Google Scholar
- Block, N. (1995). The mind as the software of the brain. In L. R. Gleitman (Ed.), An invitation to cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
- Haugeland, J. (1981). Semantic engines: An introduction to mind design. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 1–34). Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
- Haugeland, J. (2002). Syntax, semantics, physics. In J. Preston & M. Bishop (Eds.), Views into the Chinese room: New essays on Searle and artificial intelligence (pp. 379–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Moreno, A., & Lasa, A. (2003). From basic adaptivity to early mind. Evolution and Cognition, 9, 12–30.Google Scholar
- Moreno, A., Merelo, J., & Etxeberria, A. (1992). Perception, adaptation and learning. In Proceedings of a Workshop on Autopoiesis and Perception, Dublin. http://www.eeng.dcu.ie/~alife/bmcm9401/contents.txt.
- Rosen, R. (1985). Anticipatory systems. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. (1990). Is the brain a digital computer? Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 64, 21–37.Google Scholar
- Varela, F. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Varela, F. (1992). Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In B. McMullin & N. Murphy (Eds.), Proceedings of a Workshop on Autopoiesis and Perception, Dublin City University.Google Scholar