New Developments in the Philosophy of AI
The philosophy of AI has seen some changes, in particular: (1) AI moves away from cognitive science, and (2) the long term risks of AI now appear to be a worthy concern. In this context, the classical central concerns – such as the relation of cognition and computation, embodiment, intelligence & rationality, and information – will regain urgency.
KeywordsAI risk Cognitive science Computation Embodiment Philosophy of AI Philosophy of artificial intelligence Rationality Superintelligence
- Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ditterich, T., & Horowitz, E. Benefits and risks of artificial intelligence, medium.com. https://medium.com/@tdietterich/benefits-and-risks-of-artificial-intelligence-460d288cccf3%3E. Accessed 23 Jan 2015.
- Müller, V. C. (ed.). (2012) Theory and philosophy of AI (Minds and machines, 22/2- Special volume). Springer.Google Scholar
- Müller, V. C. (ed.). (2013). Theory and philosophy of artificial intelligence (SAPERE, vol. 5). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Müller, V. C., & Bostrom, N. (2016). Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. In V. C. Müller (Ed.), Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence (pp. 553–570). Synthese Library; Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Putnam, H. (1960). Minds and machines. In Mind, language and reality. Philosophical Papers, Volume II (pp. 362–385). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1975).Google Scholar
- Russell, S., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015). Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. http://futureoflife.org/static/data/documents/research_priorities.pdf%3E