Advertisement

Green Management Practices

  • Y. H. Venus LunEmail author
  • Kee-hung Lai
  • Christina W. Y. Wong
  • T. C. E. Cheng
Chapter
Part of the Shipping and Transport Logistics book series (STL)

Abstract

Understanding why green management practices (GMPs) should be adopted in the shipping industry is important for a number of reasons (as shown in Fig. 4.1).

Keywords

Supply Chain Firm Performance Business Partner Container Terminal Dominant Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Almotairi B, Lumsden K (2009) Port logistics platform integration in supply chain management. Int J Shipping Transp Logistics 1(2):194–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez G, Jimenez JB, Lorente JC (2001) Ananalysis of environmental management, organizational context and performance of Spanish hotels. Omega 29(6):457–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowen FE, Cousins PD, Lamming RC, Farukt AC (2001) The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Prod Oper Manag 10(2):174–89Google Scholar
  4. Carter CR, Ellram LM, Ready KJ (1998) Environmental purchasing: benchmarking our German counterparts. Int J Purchasing Mater Manag 34(4):28–38Google Scholar
  5. Christmann P, Taylor G (2001) Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China. J Int Bus Stud 32(3):439–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darnall N, Edwards D (2006) Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: the role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strateg Manag J 27:301–20Google Scholar
  7. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550Google Scholar
  8. Faruk AC, Lamming RC, Cousins PD, Bowen FE (2002) Analyzing, mapping, and managing environmental impacts along the supply chain. J Ind Ecol 5(2):13–36Google Scholar
  9. Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1989) Strategic intent. Harvard Bus Rev 67(3):63–76Google Scholar
  10. Handfield R, Walton SV, Sroufe R, Melnyk SA (2002) Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: a study of the application of the analytical hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 141(1):70–87Google Scholar
  11. Judge WQ, Douglas DJ (1998) Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issue into the strategic planning process: an empirical assessment. J Manag Stud 35(2):241–62Google Scholar
  12. Kainuma Y, Tawara N (2006) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to learn and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 101(1):99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klassen RD, McLaughlin CP (1996) The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Manag Sci 42(8):1199–214Google Scholar
  14. Koufteros XA, Nahm AY, Cheng TCE, Lai K (2007) An empirical assessment of a nomological network of constructs: from customer orientation to pull production and performance. Int J Prod Econ 106(2):468–92Google Scholar
  15. Lun YHV (2008) Adoption of electronic commerce by logistics service providers in Hong Kong. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDMGoogle Scholar
  16. Lun YHV (2011) Green management practices and firm performance: a case of container terminal operations. Resour, Conserv Recycl 55(6):559–66Google Scholar
  17. Lun YHV (2013) Development of green shipping network to enhance environmental and economic performance. Pol Marit Res 79(1):13–19Google Scholar
  18. Lun YHV, Browne M (2009) Fleet mix in container shipping operations. Int J Shipping Transp Logistics 1(2):103–18Google Scholar
  19. Lun YHV, Wong CWY, Lai K, Cheng TCE (2008) Institutional perspective on the adoption of technology for security enhancement of container transport. Transp Rev 28(1):21–33Google Scholar
  20. Lun YHV, Lai K, Cheng TCE (2009a) A descriptive framework for the development and operation of liner shipping network. Transp Rev 29(4):439–57Google Scholar
  21. Lun YHV, Lu CS, Lai K (2009b) Introduction to the special issue on transport logistics and physical distribution. Int J Prod Econ 122:1–3Google Scholar
  22. Lun YHV, Pang KW, Panayides PM (2010) Organizational growth and firm performance in the international container shipping industry. Int Shipping Transp Logistics 2(2):206–23Google Scholar
  23. Montabon F, Sroufe R, Narasimhan R (2007) An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. J Oper Manag 25:998–1014Google Scholar
  24. Meredith J (1998) Building operations management theory through case field research. J Oper Manag 21:329–351Google Scholar
  25. Niemann J, Tichkiewitch S, Westkämper E (2009) Design of sustainable product life cycles. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. Panayides PM, Lun YHV (2009) The impact of trust on innovativeness and supply chain performance. Int J Prod Econ 122:35–46Google Scholar
  27. Reinhardt FL (1998) Environmental product differentiation: implications for corporate strategy. Calif Manag Rev 40(4):43–73Google Scholar
  28. Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40(3):354–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sarkis J (2003) A strategic decision marking framework for green supply chain management. J Clear Prod 11(4):397–409MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheu JB, Chou YH, Hu CC (2005) An integrated logistics operational model for green supply chain management. Transp Res Part E 41(4):287–313Google Scholar
  31. Shrivastava P (1995) Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J 6:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Song DP, Dong JX, Roe M (2010) Optimal container dispatching policy and its structure in a shuttle service with finite capacity and random demands. Int J Shipping Transp Logistics 2(1):44–58Google Scholar
  33. Ugboma C, Ugboma O, Damachi B (2009) A comparative assessment of service quality perspectives and satisfaction in ports: evidence from Nigeria. Int J Shipping Transp Logistics 1(2):172–93Google Scholar
  34. Walton SV, Handfield RB, Melnyk SA (1998) The green supply chain: integrating suppliers into environmental management process. Int J Purchasing Mater Manag (Spring) 34:2–11Google Scholar
  35. Wong CWY, Lai KH, Cheng TCE (2009a) Complementarities and alignment of information systems management and supply chain management. Int J Shipping Transp Logistics 1(2):156–71Google Scholar
  36. Wong CWY, Lai K, Ngai EWT (2009b) The role of supplier operational adaptation on the performance of IT–enabled logistics under environmental uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ 122(1):47–55Google Scholar
  37. Yang J, Wong CWY, Lai K, Ntoko AN (2009) The antecedents of dyadic quality performance and its effect on buyer–supplier relationship improvement. Int J Prod Econ 120(1):243–51Google Scholar
  38. Yin RK (1994) Case study research: Design and methods. SageGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprise. J Manag 22:265–289Google Scholar
  40. Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K (2008) Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):261–73Google Scholar
  41. Zsidisin GA, Hendrick TE (1998) Purchasing’s involvement in environmental issues: a multi–country perspective. Ind Manag Data Syst 7:313–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. H. Venus Lun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kee-hung Lai
    • 2
  • Christina W. Y. Wong
    • 3
  • T. C. E. Cheng
    • 4
  1. 1.Shipping Research CentreThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina
  2. 2.Shipping Research CentreThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina
  3. 3.Shipping Research CentreThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina
  4. 4.Shipping Research CentreThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations