Abstract
The Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) method has been implemented in a wide variety of industries, activities and countries. This article is based on the implementation of this method in two different units of the same company which designs, develops and produces high-tech parts. Even if it is based on the implementation process and its results, the scope exceeds this context. The analysis is made with a time perspective, considering not only the implementation but also the evolution following its completion. As a result, two different sides can be highlighted: the first one concerns the outcomes achieved in each case as a consequence of the implementation of the method, and the second one is related to the key aspects identified in the implementation processes—in particular the success factors. The comparative analysis regarding the results achieved in both cases, in a time period that goes beyond the implementation timeframe, is of special interest. The findings of this work lead to some new aspects concerning the method, which require further research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Apaolaza U (2009) Investigación en el método de gestión de entornos multiproyecto “Cadena Crítica”. Mondragon Unibertsitatea, Mondragon
Archibald R (1987) The history of modern project management: key milestones in the early PERT/CPM/PDM days. Project Manag J 18:29–32
Beck K, Cockburn A, Jeffries R, Highsmith J (2001) Manifesto for agile software development. http://www.agilemanifesto.org, Cited 31 Mar 2015
Blomquist T, Hällgren M, Nilsson A, Söderholm A (2010) Project-as-practice: in search of project management research that matters. Project Manag J. doi:10.1002/pmj.20141
Bredillet CN (2010) Mapping the dynamics of the project management field: project management in action (part 5). Project Manag J. doi:10.1002/pmj.20161
Cicmil S (2006) Understanding project management practice through interpretative and critical research perspectives. Project Manag J 37:27–37
Cook SC (1998) Applying critical chain to improve the management of uncertainty in projects. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts
Goldratt EM, Cox J (1992) The goal: a process of ongoing improvement. North River Press, Great Barrington
Goldratt EM (1997) Critical chain. North River Press, Great Barrington
Gummesson E (2000) Qualitative methods in management research. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
Gupta S (2010) More success in managing pipeline projects. Pipeline Gas J, vol 237. http://www.pipelineandgasjournal.com/more-success-managing-pipeline-projects, Cited 31 Mar 2015
Ivory C, Alderman N (2005) Can Project Management learn anything from studies of failure in complex systems? Project Manag J 36:5–16
Kloppenborg T, Opfer W (2002) The current state of project management research: trends, interpretations, and predictions. Project Manag J 33:5–18
Leach LP (2005) Critical Chain project management, 2nd edn. Artech House, Boston
Marucheck A, Pannesi R, Anderson C (1990) An exploratory study of the manufacturing strategy process in practice. J Op Manag 9:101–123
O’Neal C, Tabatabaei M, Schrottner B (2006) A trend analysis of project management epistemology in information technology research. In: Proceedings of the 2006 southern association for information systems conference (26–28)
Pinto JK (2002) Project management. Res Technol Manag 45:22–37
Shenhar AJ, Dvir D (1996) Toward a typological theory of project management. Res Policy 25:607–632
Sauser BJ, Reilly RR, Shenhar AJ (2009) Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights—A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars climate orbiter loss. Int J Project Manag 27:665–679
Stoneburner JD (1999) Project Management methods for accelerated product management. San José State University, San José
Srinivasan MM, Best WD, Chandrasekaran S (2007) Warner Robins Air Logistics Center streamlines aircraft repair and overhaul. Interfaces 37:7–21
Tatikonda MV, Rosenthal SR (2000) Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 47:74–87
Yin RK (2009) Case study research—design and methods, 4th edn. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Apaolaza, U., Lizarralde, A. (2016). Implementation and Evolution of the Critical Chain Method: A Case Study. In: Ayuso Muñoz, J., Yagüe Blanco, J., Capuz-Rizo, S. (eds) Project Management and Engineering Research, 2014. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26459-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26459-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26457-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26459-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)