Skip to main content

Design and Development of Intelligent Military Training Systems and Wargames

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Computational Intelligence in Defense and Security

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 621))

  • 1426 Accesses

Abstract

Today’s military teams are required to operate in environments that are increasingly complex. Such settings are characterized by the presence of ill-structured problems, uncertain dynamics, shifting and ill-defined or competing goals, action/feedback loops, time constraints, high stakes, multiple players and roles, and organizational goals and norms. Warfare scenarios are real world systems that typically exhibit such characteristics and are classified as Complex Adaptive Systems. To remain effective in such demanding environments, defence teams must undergo training that targets a range of knowledge, skills and abilities. Thus oftentimes, as the complexity of the transfer domain increases, so, too, should the complexity of the training intervention. The design and development of such complex, large scale training simulator systems demands a formal architecture and development of a military simulation framework that is often based upon the needs, goals of training. In order to design and develop intelligent military training systems of this scale and fidelity to match the real world operations, and be considered as a worthwhile alternative for replacement of field exercises, appropriate Computational Intelligence (CI) paradigms are the only means of development. A common strategy for tackling this goal is incorporating CI techniques into the larger training initiatives and designing intelligent military training systems and wargames. In this chapter, we describe an architectural approach for designing composable, multi-service and joint wargames that can meet the requirements of several military establishments using product-line architectures. This architecture is realized by the design and development of common components that are reused across applications and variable components that are customizable to different training establishments’ training simulators. Some of the important CI techniques that are used to design these wargame components are explained swith suitable examples, followed by their applications to two specific cases of Joint Warfare Simulation System and an Integrated Air Defence Simulation System for air-land battles is explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smith, R.: The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World. Alfred A. Knopf, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McNab, R.B., Angelis, D.I.: Does computer based training impact maintenance costs and actions? An empirical analysis of the US Navy’s AN/SQQ-89(v) sonar system. Appl. Econ. 46(34), 4256–4266 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tolk, A.: Engineering Principles of Combat Modeling and Distributed Simulation. Wiley, New Jersey (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Law, A., Kelton, W.: Simulation Modelling & Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaiswal, N.K.: Military Operations Research: Quantitative Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Best, C., Galanis, G., Kerry, J., Sottilate, R., Fundamental Issues in Defence Training and Simulation. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Surrey, GU9 7PT, England (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rao, D.V.: The Design of Air Warfare Simulation System. Technical report, Institute for Systems Studies and Analyses (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan, A., Grisogono, A.M.: Hybrid complex adaptive engineered systems: a case study in defence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Complex Systems (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ilachinski, Andy: Irreducible semi-autonomous adaptive combat (ISAAC): an artificial-life approach to land combat. Mil. Oper. Res. 5(3), 29–46 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ilachinski, Andy: Towards a Science of Experimental Complexity: An Artificial-Life Approach to Modeling Warfare. Center for Naval Analyses, undated, Alexandria, VA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dockery, J.T., Woodcock, A.E.R. (eds.): The Military Landscape: Mathematical Models of Combat. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ilachinski, A.: Land Warfare and Complexity, Part I: Mathematical Background and Technical Sourcebook (No. CNA-CIM-461.10). Center for Naval Analyses, Alexandria VA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ilachinski, A.: Land Warfare and Complexity, Part Ii: An Assessment of the Applicability of Nonlinear Dynamics and Complex Systems Theory to the Study of Land Warfare (No. CNA-CRM-96–68). Center for Naval Analyses, Alexandria, VA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mittal, S., Martin, J.L.R.: Netcentric System of Systems Engineering with DEVS Unified Process. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wainer, G.A.: Discrete-Event Modeling and Simulation: A Practitioner’s Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zeigler, B.P., Praehofer, H., Kim, T.G.: Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Integrating Discrete event and Continuous Complex Dynamic Systems, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zeigler, B.P., Sarjoughian, H.S.: Guide to Modeling and Simulation of Systems of Systems: Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications. Springer, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zeigler, B.P., Hammonds, P.E.: Modeling and Simulation-Based Data Engineering: Introducing Pragmatics into Ontologies for Net-Centric Information Exchange. Elsevier Academic Press, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stol, K.J., Avgeriou, P., Babar, M., Lucas, Y., Fitzgerald, B.: Key factors for adopting inner source. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Method. (TOSEM), 23(2) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rafferty, L.A., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H.: The Human Factors of Fratricide. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Surrey, GU9 7PT, England, (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rao, D.V.: Damage estimation and assessment modelling of ground targets in air-land battle simulations. J. Battlefield Technol. 18(1) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rao D.V., Saha B.: An Agent oriented Approach to Developing Intelligent Training Simulators. In: SISO Euro-SIW Conference, Ontario, Canada (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bonabeau, E.: Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99(Suppl 3), 7280–7287 (2002). doi:10.1073/pnas.082080899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burgin, G.H., Fogel L.J.: Air-to-Air combat tactics synthesis and analysis program based on an adaptive maneuvering logic. J. Cybern. 2(4), (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fogel, L.J.: Rule based air combat simulation. DTIC Report, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a257194.pdf

  26. Weiss, G. (ed.): Multiagent Systems (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents series), 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge 02142, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ilachinski, A.: Artificial War: Multiagent-Based Simulation of Combat. World Scientific, Singapore (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems, 2nd edn. Wiley, UK (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taher, J., Zomaya, A.Y.: Artificial Neural Networks in Handbook of Nature-Inspired and Innovative Computing. In: Zomaya, A.Y. (ed.) Integrating Classical Models with Emerging Technologies, pp. 147–186. Springer, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jang, J.S.R.: ANFIS: Adaptive Network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 23(3), 665–685 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jang, J.S.R., Sun, C.T., Mizutani, E.: Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing: A Computational approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mitra, S., Yoichi, Hayashi: Neuro-Fuzzy rule generation: survey in soft computing framework. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11(3), 748–768 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goodrich, K.H., McManus, J.W.: Development of a tactical guidance research and evaluation system (TGRES). In: AIAA Paper 893312 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kurnaz, S., Cetin, O., Kaynak, O.: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based autonomous flight control of unmanned air vehicles. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(2), 1229–1234 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moon, I.C., Carley, K.M.: Modeling and simulating terrorist networks in social and geospatial dimensions. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(5), 40–49 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee, G., Oh, N., Moon, I.C.: Modeling and simulating network-centric operations of organizations for crisis management. In Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Emerging Applications of M&S in Industry and Academia Symposium, p. 13. Society for Computer Simulation International (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moon, I.C., Oh, A.H., Carley, K.M.: Analyzing social media in escalating crisis situations. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), pp. 71–76. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rao, D.V., Singh, S.: Recognition and identification of target images using feature based retrieval in UAV missions. In: IEEE National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics (NCVPRIPG 2013) IIT Jodhpur (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fowler, C.A. Bert: Asymmetric warfare: a primer. IEEE Spectrum http://spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/aviation/asymmetric-warfare-a-primer (2006)

  40. Kokar, M.M., Wang, J.: An example of using ontologies and symbolic information in automatic target recognition. In: Sensor Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications VI, pp. 40–50. SPIE. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rao, D.V., Shankar, R., Iliadis L., Sarma, V.V.S.: An Ontology based approach to designing adaptive lesson plans in military training simulators. In: Proceedings of the 13th EANN (Engineering Applications of Neural Networks), Springer LNCS AICT, vol. 363(1), pp. 81–93 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Woelk, D.: e-Learning technology for improving business performance and lifelong learning. In: Singh, Muninder P. (ed.) The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing. Chapman & Hall, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hammond, K.F.: Case based planning: a frame-work for planning from experience. Cogn. Sci. 14(3), 385–443 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hanks, S., Weld, D.S.: A domain-independent algorithm for plan adaptation. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2, 319–360 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kambhampati, S., Hendler, J.A.: A validation-structure-based theory of plan modification and reuse. Artif. Intell. 55(2), 193–258 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Munoz-Avila, H., Cox, M.: Case-based plan adaptation: an analysis and review. IEEE Intell. Syst. 23, 75–81 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ram, A., Francis, A.: Multi-plan retrieval and adaptation in an experience-based agent. In Leake, D.B. (ed.) Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions. AAAI Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Spalazzi, L.: A survey on case-based planning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 16(1), 3–36 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Sugandh, N., Ontanon, S., Ram, A., Online Case-based plan adaptation for real-time strategy games. In: Proceeding Twenty Third AAAI Conference on AI, pp. 702–707 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rao, D.V., Iliadis L., Spartalis S.: A Neuro-fuzzy hybridization approach to model weather operations in a virtual warfare analysis system. In: Proceedings of the 12th EANN (Engineering Applications of Neural Networks), Springer LNCS AICT, vol. 363(1), pp. 111–121 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 11(2) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gomez-Perez, A., Corcho, O., Fernandez-Lopez, M.: Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management. e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Neches, R., Fikes, R., Finin, T., Gruber, T., Patil, R., Senator, T., Swartout, W.: Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Magazine Fall 12(3) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fisher, M., Sheth, A.: Semantic enterprise content management. In: Singh, Muninder P. (ed.) The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing. Chapman & Hall, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Meliza, L.L., Goldberg, S.L., Lampton, D.R.: After action review in simulation-based training, RTO-TR-HFM-121-Part-II, Technical report (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Raju P., Ahmed. V.: Enabling technologies for developing next generation learning object repository for construction. Autom. Constr. vol 22 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Berry, J., Benlamri, R., Atif, Y.: Ontology-Based framework for context-aware mobile learning. In: IWCMC’06, Canada (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sabou, M., Wroeb, C., Goble, C., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Learning domain ontologies for semantic web service descriptions. J. Web Semant. vol. 3 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Brusilovsky, P., Wolfgang, N.: Adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web. In: Singh, Muninder P. (ed.) The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing. Chapman & Hall, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Aparicio IV, M., Singh, M.P.: Concepts and practice of personalisation. In: Singh, Muninder P. (ed.) The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing. Chapman & Hall, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  61. http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/users.html#papers

  62. http://www-ksl-svc.stanford.edu:5915/doc/frame-editor/what-is-an-ontology.html

  63. http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~sattler/reasoners.html

  64. Lenat, D.B., Guha, R.V.: Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems, Reading. Addison-Wesley, MA (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gruber, T.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) International Workshop on Formal Ontology, Padova, Italy (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Gruber, T.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: Guarino, N., Poli, R. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Technical Report KSL-01–05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Cox, E.: The Fuzzy Systems Handbook, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Banks, J.: Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice. Wiley, New York (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  70. Rao D.V., Jasleen, K.: A Fuzzy rule-based approach to design game rules in a mission planning and evaluation system. In: 6th IFIP Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rao D.V., Iliadis L., Spartalis S., Papaleonidas A.: Modelling environmental factors and effects in virtual warfare simulators by using a multi agent approach. Int. J. Artif. Intell. 9(A12), pp. 172–185 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kim, J., Moon, I.C., Kim, T.G.: New insight into doctrine via simulation interoperation of heterogeneous levels of models in battle experimentation. Simulation 88(6), 649–667 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Rao, D.V., Mehra, P.K.: A methodology to evaluate the combat potential and military force effectiveness for decision support. J. Battlefield Technol. 16(1) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Mendel, J.M.: Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems-Introduction and New Directions. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Ilachinski, A.: EINSTein. In: Artificial Life Models in Software, pp. 259–315. Springer, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ilachinski, A.: EINSTein: a multiagent-based model of combat. In: Artificial Life Models in Software, pp. 143–185. Springer, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Vijay Rao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vijay Rao, D. (2016). Design and Development of Intelligent Military Training Systems and Wargames. In: Abielmona, R., Falcon, R., Zincir-Heywood, N., Abbass, H. (eds) Recent Advances in Computational Intelligence in Defense and Security. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26450-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26450-9_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26448-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26450-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics