Abstract
The Internet impacts social communication and the public sphere, and this impact has consequences for the political shape of the communication order—therefore, for society as a whole. One important question in this regard is which regulatory framework is being developed for the Internet, and how this framework enables and at the same time restricts communication in the public sphere. Net neutrality is at the very core of this question: distribution channels can be used as a means to discriminate, control, and prevent communication. In other words, content and user behavior can be controlled through the architecture of the physical layer and the “code” layer of the Internet. The discussion on net neutrality touches fundamental values (public interest, freedom of expression, freedom of the media, and free flow of information), that communications policy authorities in liberal democracies frequently appeal to in order to legitimize their interventions in media systems. The implementation of these values, from a normative point of view, is seen as the precondition for media to create the public sphere—be it online or offline—and thus fulfill its function in society (Napoli 2001).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bendrath, R., & Mueller, M. (2011). The end of the net as we know it? Deep packet inspection and Internet governance. New Media & Society, 13, 1142–1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444811398031
Blevins, J., & Barrow, S. L. (2009). The political economy of free speech and network neutrality: A critical analysis. Journal of Media Law & Ethics, 1(1/2), 27–48.
Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, D. (2007). Network neutrality: Words of power and 800-pound gorillas. International Journal of Communication, 1, 701–708.
Curien, N., & Maxwell, W. (2011). La neutralité d’Internet. Paris: La Découverte.
Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the public sphere. London: Sage.
Dahlgren, P. (2010). Public spheres, societal shifts and media modulations. In J. Gripsrud & L. Weibull (Eds.), Media, markets & public spheres. European media at the crossroads (pp. 17–36). Bristol: Intellect.
Dulong de Rosnay, M. (2011). Réappropriation des données et droit à la rediffusion. Hermès, 59, 65–66.
Elkin-Koren, N. (2006). Making technology visible: Liability of internet service providers for peer-to-peer traffic. New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 9(15), 15–76.
Goldsmith, J., & Wu, T. (2006). Who controls the Internet? Illusions of a borderless world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. I & II). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Boston: MIT Press.
Hahn, R., & Litan, R. E. (2007). The myth of network neutrality and what we should do about it. International Journal of Communication, 1, 595–606.
Herman, B. D. (2006). Opening bottlenecks: On behalf of mandated network neutrality. Federal Communications Law Journal, 59, 107–159.
Holznagel, B. (2010). Netzneutralität als Auf gabeder Vielfaltssicherung. Kommunikation und Recht, 13, 95–100.
Levy, S. (2012). Power House. Deep inside a Google data center. Wired, 17 October.
Libertus, M., & Wiesner, J. (2011). Netzneutralität, offenes Internet und kommunikative Grundversorgung. Media Perspektiven, 2, 80–90.
Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Media studies’ fascination with the concept of the public sphere: Critical reflections and emerging debates. Media Culture & Society, 35, 87–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443712464562
Marsden, C. (2010). Net neutrality. Towards a co-regulatory solution. London: Bloomsbury Academic. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781849662192
Mueller, M., & Asghari, H. (2012). Deep packet inspection and bandwidth management: Battles over BitTorrent in Canada and the United States. Telecommunications Policy, 36, 462–475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.04.003
Napoli, P. (2001). Foundations of communications policy: Principles and process in the regulation of electronic media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Nunziato, D. C. (2009). Virtual freedom: Net neutrality and free speech in the Internet age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Palfrey, J., & Rogoyski, R. (2006). The move to the middle: The enduring threat of “harmful” speech to network neutrality. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 21, 31–65.
Splichal, S. (2012). Transnationalization of the public sphere and the fate of the public. New York: Hampton Press.
Ufer, F. (2010). Der Kampf um die Netzneutralität oder die Frage, warum ein Netz neutral sein muss. Kommunikation und Recht, 13, 383–389.
Van Eijk, N. (2011). Net neutrality and audiovisual services. IRIS Plus, 5, 7–19.
Vogelsang, I. (2010). Die Debatte um Netzneutralität und Quality of Service. In D. Klumpp, H. Kubicek, A. Roßnagel, & W. Schulz (Eds.), Netzwelt – Wege –Werte – Wandel (pp. 5–14). Berlin: Springer.
Wendelin, M. (2011). Medialisierung der Öffentlichkeit. Kontinuität und Wandel einer normativen Kategorie der Moderne. Köln: Halem.
Wu, T. (2010). The master switch: The rise and fall of information empires. New York: Knopf.
Wu, T., & Yoo, C. (2007). Keeping the Internet Neutral?: Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo Debate. Federal Communications Law Journal, 59, 575–592.
Wu, T., & Bilton, N. (2010). One on one: Tim Wu, author of ‘The Master Switch’ New York Times, 14 November. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/one-on-one-tim-wu-author-of-the-master-switch/. Accessed 9 Aug 2015.
Yoo, C. (2005). Beyond network neutrality. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 19, 1–77.
Yoo, C. (2012). Network neutrality and the need for a technological turn in Internet scholarship. In M. E. Price, S. G. Verhulst, & L. Morgan (Eds.), Routledge handbook of media law (pp. 539–555). New York, Abingdon: Routledge.
Zittrain, J. (2008). The future of the Internet and how to stop it. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Musiani, F., Löblich, M. (2016). Net Neutrality from a Public Sphere Perspective. In: Belli, L., De Filippi, P. (eds) Net Neutrality Compendium. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26425-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26425-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26424-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26425-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)